Questions on events of the day

[Riot]

1) Republican Darrell Issa, in his committee investigation of "Libya-gate", and in an attempt to harm the president politically, released secret information he had access to, that also inadvertently revealed the names of Libyans working secretly with the USA, putting these Libyan's lives in danger.

Should Darrell Issa resign his committee position in disgrace for endangering these peoples lives for politics? Yes or no?

2) It turns out that Tagg Romney recently purchased and now owns a large chunck of the company that owns proven-easiliy-hackable voting machines, those machines being used in this election in Texas and Ohio (and two other states).

Does Romney's son being the controlling interest in the company that owns these voting machines bother you? Yes or no?

[timmgirvan]

no and no

[jms62]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

no and no

You voting for someone who will take your SSI from you priceless

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by jms62

You voting for someone who will take your SSI from you priceless

Really? Where is that stated?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by geeker2

Really? Where is that stated?

Really that's your strategy? A party that wants to wage all out war on entitlements? You need me to steam up a window and draw you a fuking picture or are you smart enough to see it for yourself. No I do not have a link that states "Hey we are going to take your SSI away from you". But you can watch Romney's video to that talks about the 47% for a clue.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by geeker2

Really? Where is that stated?

The Ryan budget your candidate Romney supports.

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by jms62

Really that's your strategy? A party that wants to wage all out war on entitlements? You need me to steam up a window and draw you a fuking picture or are you smart enough to see it for yourself. No I do not have a link that states "Hey we are going to take your SSI away from you". But you can watch Romney's video to that talks about the 47% for a clue.

47% comment at a fund raising equates to ending SS which isn't even an entitlement program

There is zero question that SS has to be reformed - and I expect that eventually both sides will come to some compromise that no one will completely support.

The fantastic part is that if you are 55 and older you don't need to give a sh*t.