Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 05-08-2009, 08:27 AM
jpops757 jpops757 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Garland tx [Dallas area]
Posts: 1,103
Default why???

According to Privman in yesterdays drf, noone knows if Rachel can get into the Preakness field if more than 14 enter even with the supliment. Noone can understand the vague requirements.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 05-08-2009, 08:56 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpops757
According to Privman in yesterdays drf, noone knows if Rachel can get into the Preakness field if more than 14 enter even with the supliment. Noone can understand the vague requirements.

so, it'd come down to how the officials read the requirements, right? i'd think they'll get rachel in the race.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 05-08-2009, 09:03 AM
tector's Avatar
tector tector is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
so, it'd come down to how the officials read the requirements, right? i'd think they'll get rachel in the race.


This is one bet you can take to the bank. Only a court order could stop them (which, I think, would be unlikely).
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 05-08-2009, 09:25 AM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tector


This is one bet you can take to the bank. Only a court order could stop them (which, I think, would be unlikely).
true that
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 05-08-2009, 11:05 AM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
I'm the most conservative person in the world when it comes to giving horses time between races. I hate running horses back quickly. But in this case, I would definitely run Rachel in the Preakness. She was under a strangle-hold in the Oaks. She wasn't even close to being all out. She could have won by another 5-10 lengths if she was asked. As others have said, that race was like a workout for her.

In addition, the Preakness should be an easy race for her. I don't think there will be a horse in there that can come within 8 lengths of her. I think she will be able to win under a strangle-hold again. I would have no concerns about bringing her back in 15 days in this case.
How can you possibly conclude that? Just cause she wasn't whipped? Have you looked at the fractions? She ran her last furlong in 12.16. To go 5 lengths faster she would have had to have gone in 11.36. To go 10 lengths faster she would have had to go in 10.56. Are we really to believe that is physically possible? If asked she may have moved up 2-3 lengths. This is like Bernardini all over. Everyone said he could have gone so much faster if asked even though the finishing fractions suggested that wasn't possible. Sure enough when finally asked he went no faster than he'd gone in his previous races.

Also, I love the idea of a 3yo filly doing the Whitney/Travers double. That would be awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 05-08-2009, 11:55 AM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Her mile time was 1.36 so that was being asked . Her unexpectedley coming in off 2 weeks rest just seems like Jackson needs a publicity fix .
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 05-08-2009, 12:13 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitas
Her mile time was 1.36 so that was being asked . Her unexpectedley coming in off 2 weeks rest just seems like Jackson needs a publicity fix .

is that why every derby starter that goes in the preakness is running? this seems to fall into the 'she's a filly, shouldn't face the colts' type of mindset. she's actually getting a day more in between than those colts-another advantage to go with a weight break.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 05-08-2009, 12:14 PM
ezgoerbaby's Avatar
ezgoerbaby ezgoerbaby is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 53
Default

Simply ridiculous to run her back this quick. I don't see it happening. Hope they wait until late summer/early fall to go against the boys. I really hope she is not the ill fated type. Also...I honestly don't believe Calvin will get the chance to ride RA again...Jess only wants HIS trusted people to handle the horse. I"m probably wrong...happens all the time...but I'm willing to bet on that.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 05-08-2009, 12:16 PM
ezgoerbaby's Avatar
ezgoerbaby ezgoerbaby is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
is that why every derby starter that goes in the preakness is running? this seems to fall into the 'she's a filly, shouldn't face the colts' type of mindset. she's actually getting a day more in between than those colts-another advantage to go with a weight break.
She wasn't initially being pointed to a race in two weeks though by the original connections..I would imagine they were letting her rest a bit, not cranking her up to run again in 15 days.
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 05-08-2009, 12:28 PM
ezgoerbaby's Avatar
ezgoerbaby ezgoerbaby is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 53
Default

He's won the Preakness already...I don't think she wins the Preakness as easily as everyone thinks. I like her as much as the next person, but she's going to be facing some quick stakes colts, not future claiming fillies. Let her grow up and mature a bit. Save her for the big races that can make her more than just a 3 y.o. filly champ. That's just my take on it...
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:11 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

The more I think of it the more I love Blackthroats suggestion of a Belmont Stakes / Whitney / Travers triple.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:35 PM
Lovely Laurel Lovely Laurel is offline
Les Bois
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default BTW

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I couldn't possibly care less.
Folks:

You have to understand that this guy doesn't care about racing, or life for that matter, beyond the Hudson River. Hell of a handicapper, but if it ain't NYRA related, forget bout it!
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:38 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely Laurel
Folks:

You have to understand that this guy doesn't care about racing, or life for that matter, beyond the Hudson River. Hell of a handicapper, but if it ain't NYRA related, forget bout it!


Lauren,

Always good to hear from you. Inaccurate.....but good.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:49 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ezgoerbaby
She wasn't initially being pointed to a race in two weeks though by the original connections..I would imagine they were letting her rest a bit, not cranking her up to run again in 15 days.
she's already cranked up. you think horses are like a light switch? that she's been turned off? she's in top shape-just like the other horses.
mine that bird wasn't being considered for the preakness til he won the derby. you think the change in schedule will be his undoing? i doubt it.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:49 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I certainly understand the sentiment of not running back so quick. But, Hull's connections were planning on running in the Woody Stephens (a 7 furlong race) on the Belmont undercard and they switched plans after seeing the Derby. If she's doing well, why not? In my opinion you have to strike while the iron is hot. They might not get another chance like this.
yes, but he's not a fragile hot house flower of a filly. he's not a dwl horse either, so it's all good.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:53 PM
dagolfer33's Avatar
dagolfer33 dagolfer33 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,524
Default

They just said it for sure, Borel...RA....Preakness....its a go.
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 05-08-2009, 01:58 PM
mark2061mn's Avatar
mark2061mn mark2061mn is offline
Aqueduct
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 606
Default Borel to Ride RA

http://www.bloodhorse.com/article/50683.htm
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 05-08-2009, 02:06 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...683&source=rss

Edited press release

Stonestreet Stables and partner Harold T. McCormick announced May 8 that Calvin Borel has agreed to ride Kentucky Oaks (gr. I) winner Rachel Alexandra for the current racing season. Also, Stonestreet said it plans to run the filly in the May 16 Preakness Stakes (gr. I), contingent upon her continuing to train well up to the race.

In making the decision, Borel selected the filly over Mine That Bird, whom he rode to an upset victory in the Kentucky Derby Presented by Yum! Brands (gr. I) and is being pointed toward the preakness.

“It came down to the facts that he knows and loves this horse, that he knows how to get the most from her and he knows how to win,’’ said Jess Jackson of Stonestreet Stables and proprietor of Kendall-Jackson Wine Estates. “They were an amazing team at the Kentucky Oaks—winning by over 20 lengths. We think this is a perfect match of rider and horse.’’

Jackson said Rachel Alexandra will continue her workout schedule under trainer Steve Asmussen.

“If she continues to be in perfect condition, our intention will be to run her in the Preakness,” Jackson said, adding that the final decision would be made next week.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln

Last edited by Kasept : 05-08-2009 at 02:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 05-08-2009, 02:10 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
And this is a bad thing?
4,5,5,3,7,8,5,3,5.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 05-08-2009, 02:25 PM
ALostTexan's Avatar
ALostTexan ALostTexan is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpops757
According to Privman in yesterdays drf, noone knows if Rachel can get into the Preakness field if more than 14 enter even with the supliment. Noone can understand the vague requirements.
I have my doubts that she will even make the field due to the requirements. If 14 that are originally nominated for the field are there then I don't believe she gets in. I am sure that Zayat and some others can find a couple of nags that were originally nominated, pushing her out.

I don't agree with it in any way, but if I had a horse like Pioneer of the Nile I would probably do the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.