#201
|
||||
|
||||
Anderson steals the game for the Sens. Rangers actually played there best playoff game to date but couldn't get one in. Backs are against the wall.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#202
|
||||
|
||||
Hoping to be headed to a couple of game sevens after today, there is nothing like elimination hockey.
|
#203
|
||||
|
||||
Went to the game Friday and pointed out to my wife to watch how much Crosby whined to the refs. She is a Penguin fan and even she was irritated by how often it occurs.
|
#204
|
||||
|
||||
panthers put the devils on the golf course? hawks weasle back in it?..pens march back..wow ..game 7 at philly will be insane..
|
#205
|
|||
|
|||
i don't think there's going to be one. and i'm hoping that the caps end their series today. i don't want them to have to go back to boston.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#206
|
||||
|
||||
pens toast..
|
#207
|
|||
|
|||
nuts
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#208
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#209
|
||||
|
||||
Another horribly officiated game but the Blueshirts are :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3b9g...e_gdata_player
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#211
|
||||
|
||||
Gonna be an interesting wed night. Comes down to which netminder has the more stellar performance. (Obv lol)
|
#212
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Nice to see the honcho's manning the replay review were as clueless as the officials on the ice last night. |
#213
|
||||
|
||||
I didn't watch any of the post game, but the only thing I could think of was that it was't conclusive that Neil actually made contact and kicked the puck in ( they credited Spezza with the goal). Obviously I thought it was a garbage call.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#214
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I expected a full explanation this morning SOMEWHERE, but as of now, nothing. We can only surmise because the imbecile on the ice called it a goal (totally ignoring Neil's actions both with stick and foot), the other imbeciles felt they needed "conclusive" evidence to overturn it. It sure as hell looked conclusive to me. Hank wasn't particularly pleased. And Neil threatening Del Zotto after the game is both laughable and potentially suspension worthy (I can recall a guy named Avery being suspended for off ice comments). What we didn't see (at least I didn't, because I was focused on Neil's nonsense) was Michalek KICKING Girardi during that scrum. Supposedly it will be reviewed, although based on what's gone on to this point, can't help but expect nothing to come of it. |
#215
|
||||
|
||||
A couple things on the second Ottawa goal:
1. Video replay can't go back and call a penalty that went uncalled by the officials on the ice. Similar to the missed holding calls on every single touchdown return Devon Hester and Dante Hall ever made in their NFL careers. 2. While it looked like Neil attempted to kick the puck in the net, I can't say for certain whether he did or not. Given that there wasn't video evidence that he absolutely did kick the puck in, the folks in Toronto had to let the goal stand. I'm curious to hear thoughts on the Del Zotto-Neil hit. I thought it was a questionable one - more questionable than Neil-Boyle - but also similar to Torres-Seabrook from the 2011 playoffs that did not result in a suspension. Just my two, completely unbiased cents.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#216
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#217
|
||||
|
||||
I agree to an extent, but I also had a problem with the Torres hit last year. Nailing a guy in the open ice with one's back (which is what Neil did - sort of a Kronwall type of play) is a lot different than a shoulder to a head. Just my opinion though, and I can certainly see it both ways.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#218
|
||||
|
||||
I thought Del Zotto's hit was clean, it isn't his fault Neil was looking behind. I also think the goal was good because there was no proof that Neil actually touched it.
|
#219
|
||||
|
||||
With all the concussion issues (still sucks that Marc Savard will never play again), I think any hit where the principle point of contact is the head should result in a penalty. There was a way for Del Zotto to hit Neil without making contact with his head.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#220
|
||||
|
||||
raffie Torres hit was clean to. you come across the ice w your head down, you need to get dropped. This is the NHL playoffs folks, not squirt house league hockey
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|