Librarians, Keepers of the Liberty

Originally Posted by Dixie Porter

The "Bold ONE" is my best pal on the net.

As for the rest, I TOTALLY AGREE and WILL take your advice.

Fondly,

Dixie

As always ... your wisdom exceeds amazing.

You handle the pony-picking ... and I'll smack down the leftist gnats.

As this thread has amply demonstrated ... I can devastate all of them without even working out between posts.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

As always ... your wisdom exceeds amazing.

You handle the pony-picking ... and I'll smack down the leftist gnats.

As this thread has amply demonstrated ... I can devastate all of them without even working out between posts.

Again, you are lame and useless in terms of ever responding.

Schmendrik.

Fairly obvious what you are. You reveal so very easily. Actually, laughable.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

It's interesting that you consider a post which consists of name-calling, personal attacks, and sophomoric vulgarity to be a "classic."

Please ... please ... continue to use it as your signature. It reveals a great deal more about you than you're smart enough to realize.

Very revealing ... yes, indeed ... very revealing.

Bold B,
If you go back to page 5 of this "thread that never ends" and reread what I said there, that you seem to have ignored, you'll see what has been revealed.
Some of the things that have been directed at you come from the fact that you've ducked answering direct questions, used Sowell to speak your thoughts (even though no substantiation of his "facts" have been given, and twisted the responses I've offered to make it sound like I said something that I clearly didn't. Others have voiced their frustrations with your "debating tactics" as well. Your gloating is "gasoline on the fire".

From my view, I'll never cause you to think outside your box, though I have gone to your townhall site in an effort to understand. Not much there for me to agree with, but at least I made the effort.
At this point, S2S, Pgardn, Somerfrost, and Irishtrekker may wish to continue this diologue. I'm a bit frustrated by your nonsense.
DTS

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

There is not now ... nor has there ever been ... such a link at townhall.com.

It's a site for serious economic and political commentary.

Lying leftists will say anything to denigrate those who disagee with and disprove their sophomoric contentions.

Hey Schmendrik!

You called me a liar about my reference to the TownHall.com link regarding "How to Buy A Semi-Automatic Handgun."

Well, here it is, listed, of course, under the "most popular articles" section, written by one of your beloved authors. Naturally, at the end of the article, he notes the best use of semi-automatic handguns would be to expel the U.N. from America.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

Yeah, very intelligent there, BB, very sharp. Uh-huh.

You are a liar, and an uninformed one at that. You are just as willing to recklessly sling libelous comments as you are unwilling to open your mind.

Originally Posted by pgardn

Cogent thought of your own? Holy crickies. The guy is joined at the skull with Sowell. And BB only got the neurons attached to lower brain stem functions. Go back to my last post to you and your 50's black family. You completely ignored them. And you should cause there really is no way out.

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

There you go again! Bold B puts words that he "thought" he heard into others' mouths.... go back and find where I said "Kofi Anan" in this thread...

Thsi just reveals your skilled debating tactics...NOT!

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

And here's the bottom line ...

All of the leftist arguments have been about process ... not about results. The fact is that all of us have been safe and secure at our keyboards for the past five years ... not because there aren't savages who would gladly murder us all ... but because our armed forces and police forces and intelligence agencies have been doing a terrific job of killing and capturing the terrorists ... and foiling their plots to attack us ... even right now as we view this post.

And who has been overall in charge of this amazingly successful security effort? Who is the one person who would be taking a barrage of hateful invective had there been additional attacks ... but who instead deserves the highest accolades in their absence?

I'll give you a few seconds to come up with the answer. Let's play the "Jeopardy" theme song while you tax your brains to come up with the answer ...

Dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-da-doo ... dern-dern-dern-dern-da-doo-di-da-da ... dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern-dern ... doo-di-da-da ...doo-doo-doo.

OK ... let's see what you've come up with.

Somerfrost says ... "Al Gore." Ummm ... no ... sorry ... Al Gore really wasn't elected president ... he was the loser ... that's not correct.

Downthestretch says ... "Kofi Annan." Gee ... sorry ... Kofi is just a corrupt, bumbling, tyrant-loving bureaucrat who'd actually be happy to see us murdered.

Pgardn says ... "Barney Frank." Nope ... also not correct ... Mr. Frank is an outstanding congressman and a very attractive man ... especially when he drools out of the right side of his mouth ... but no that's not correct either.

The correct answer is ... "George W. Bush" ... yes, George W. Bush has been the president of the United States for the past five years ... and has the overall responsibility for securing the safety and freedom of American citizens ... and has fulfilled that responsibility with great success ... George W. Bush is the correct answer.

Forget it a s s wipe. You are exposed. Liar, fraud, bigot, fool.

Here, again is your article.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

You have zero credibility. In fact it's doubtful you've done any reading at all. Most likely just repeating what you see on TV and hear on the radio.

You called me a liar.

there's the link.

You're not just a far-right bigoted zealot. You're uneducated.

Sorry. You're exposed and done.

Schmendrick.

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Bold B,
If you go back to page 5 of this "thread that never ends" and reread what I said there, that you seem to have ignored, you'll see what has been revealed.

You have several posts on page 5 ... not one of which contains a question I didn't answer ... or an assertion I didn't respond to.

What exactly are you referring to?

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

There you go again! Bold B puts words that he "thought" he heard into others' mouths.... go back and find where I said "Kofi Anan" in this thread...

Thsi just reveals your skilled debating tactics...NOT!

OK ... ignore the words which I humorously and deviously put into your mouth ...

... what's your actual answer to the question?

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

You have several posts on page 5 ... not one of which contains a question I didn't answer ... or an assertion I didn't respond to.

What exactly are you referring to?

It really does not matter what he's referring to. You're obviously willing to liee your a s s off.

Here's the link I referenced. You called me a liar and said it never was on Townhall.com.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeS...omatic_handgun

What a fool you are. That's not a surprise.

Schmendrik.

Now do some of u see why BB was banned from other forums?
This is only half of it.

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

PLEASE calm down everyone!
I never intended for this thread to become a shouting match nor an opportunity for vulgar name calling.
It seems that many people have very strong views.
That's just fine with me.
Let's attempt to be respectful (polite) with others, even if their views differ from our own.
Thank you,
DTS

Bold B,
This one.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by rockhardtenfan

Now do some of u see why BB was banned from other forums?
This is only half of it.

It's over.

He's exposed for what he is.

The worst part? He wasn't even entertaining. Not at all.

For that he should be tortured.

What a schmendrik.

He'll disappear now.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by rockhardtenfan

Now do some of u see why BB was banned from other forums?
This is only half of it.

No. He is expressing and defending his postitions, as are others.
He has actually made far fewer personal attacks than others.
Does he come across as ****y? Yes, but I don't think that is grounds for banishment.

wow I guess I used a dirty word, let's substitute overly confident.

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Bold B,
This one.

That was a very thoughtful post ... and it seems that just about everyone ... with one glaring exception ... has lived up to it.

This has been a lively and respectful debate ... absent some silly name-calling and vulgarities ... and several posters who haven't participated in the debate have commented positively on it.

So ... what's the question?

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

Does he come across as ****y? Yes, but I don't think that is grounds for banishment.

It is on another forum.

On that one ... you must follow the party line or be banished.

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

No. He is expressing and defending his postitions, as are others.
He has actually made far fewer personal attacks than others.
Does he come across as ****y? Yes, but I don't think that is grounds for banishment.

Except when he finds your position disagreeable, or when he does not like it when you reference an existing column on his beloved website, he labels you a j.. hater or a liar.

Bigot, uninformed, willing to lie. That's what I call him. 'Nuff said. Make some $$ today all.

Sidebar memo to everyone:

SentToStud is on my "ignore" list ... not because of his puerile cursing and name-calling ... but because he is a consummate bore. His posts are excruciatingly painful to read ... and I enjoy being headache-free.

So ... any message you see here from him ... I don't.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite

It is on another forum.

On that one ... you must follow the party line or be banished.

That's what I assumed.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by SentToStud

Except when he finds your position disagreeable, or when he does not like it when you reference an existing column on his beloved website, he labels you a j.. hater or a liar.

Bigot, uninformed, willing to lie. That's what I call him. 'Nuff said. Make some $$ today all.

S2S, I will admit that I haven't followed all of the twists and turns of this debate, and the name calling or labeling on either side is really a turnoff for me because it sidesteps what were some good arguements on both sides on some substantial issues.


Anyway, it's coming up on race time folks. later i'm sure. Good luck!