Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-11-2009, 10:05 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
all jokes aside NYRA should have trakus.

It's mildly funny when fatman predictably complains about problems with racing, but that doesn't change the fact that he is correct about most of the issues.
I'm not 'devoid of heart', I don't mind saying it.

To be honest I haven't been following the turf condition closely. In my opinion you go off-the-turf on situations where you may damage the course. It doesn't matter if the course is playing slow, the only thing that matters is if you will damage the course or put horse and rider at risk with dangerous conditions. I haven't been following one way or another.

With Dominguez somebody said 54 mounts. Somebody said 9% winners, and somebody said 50% in the money. No wonder the topic has drifted. Non issue.
It's not only about the damage to the course, if the ground is too soft it can cause more soft tissue injuries in the horse...of course overly hard surfaces are no help either.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-11-2009, 11:10 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
I'm not talking about the lushness or greenness of the course but rather the KICKBACK. Additionally, did you notice any horses having traction problems out there? Your contention is that the course is overladen with moisture. And it follows that the concern is that the course will be eaten up (and, that it won't be safe). Now, I've seen races run other courses where sod is flying everywhere and horses are losing action. There's a minimum of the former and none of the latter in that race. Moreover, the pacesetter was a very comfortable 2nd in the race. Usually, on very heavy (water logged) turf courses, the speed completely collapses.

I beg to differ on a few points. First of all, in my experience, speed has always seemed very dangerous on boggy courses. On Sunday's race, the field was extremely gapped out, which is hardly common in turf races. Now, maybe the field had something to do with that, but it still seemed somewhat condition related in my opinion.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-12-2009, 01:08 AM
chucklestheclown chucklestheclown is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I'm sure the fact that we had over 4" of rain over a seven day period had absolutely nothing to do with this.

You seem to think we should have raced on the turf Saturday, and believe me I wish we had been able to, yet after nearly two days of warm weather ( one of which was also very windy ) to dry out the courses, when we finally ran one on the Widener ( which, in case you're interested dries much quicker than the inner ) the time was over 3 seconds slow.

Do you honestly think we want to take races off the turf if for no other reason than it causes a great loss of handle? Sadly, there was little choice.

Now, when you want to disagree with this, please try to stick to the points.
How exactly do you decide when it is time to cancel the turf races?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-12-2009, 02:22 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I beg to differ on a few points. First of all, in my experience, speed has always seemed very dangerous on boggy courses. On Sunday's race, the field was extremely gapped out, which is hardly common in turf races. Now, maybe the field had something to do with that, but it still seemed somewhat condition related in my opinion.
Why is it significant that the races were slower then they should be? That isn't the point the point is if the course was exposed to long term harm or was unsafe for horses and jocks.. The speed of the course is not significant.. When its super fast do we say OMG lets take the races off the turf because its a speed way and the mile and a 1/16th time is 1.36?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-12-2009, 09:00 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Why is it significant that the races were slower then they should be? That isn't the point the point is if the course was exposed to long term harm or was unsafe for horses and jocks.. The speed of the course is not significant.. When its super fast do we say OMG lets take the races off the turf because its a speed way and the mile and a 1/16th time is 1.36?

Come on Freddy.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-12-2009, 09:05 AM
rgustafson rgustafson is offline
Bowie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Back on point, Lezcano riding the Belmont meet bodes ill for Ramon.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-12-2009, 09:51 AM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgustafson
Back on point, Lezcano riding the Belmont meet bodes ill for Ramon.
Lezcano's only riding on days where Monmouth is dark. He's riding full-time at Mth.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:37 AM
rgustafson rgustafson is offline
Bowie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Lezcano's only riding on days where Monmouth is dark. He's riding full-time at Mth.

NT
According to a post on Pace Advantage this morning, he is moving his tack to New York, No idea if this is accurate or not.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:38 AM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgustafson
According to a post on Pace Advantage this morning, he is moving his tack to New York, No idea if this is accurate or not.
Was it that slewis guy? The IT dept blocks me from Pace Advantage at work...I thanked them for it.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:50 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Was it that slewis guy? The IT dept blocks me from Pace Advantage at work...I thanked them for it.

NT
It was actually in the NY Post.

I was kind of hoping my IT dept would block Pace Advantage as well.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:54 AM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
It was actually in the NY Post.

I was kind of hoping my IT dept would block Pace Advantage as well.
It's funny, I've actually had to rig a few things to get me into DRF and Derby Trail. The only one that's allowed is Thoroughbred Champions. They're probably watching me post right now.

Interesting about Lezcano- he's a very good rider and would only make the colonies at Belmont and Saratoga even deeper.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-12-2009, 11:02 AM
the_fat_man's Avatar
the_fat_man the_fat_man is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Interesting about Lezcano- he's a very good rider and would only make the colonies at Belmont and Saratoga even deeper.

NT
Watch his ride on Buddy's Humor last out. It was a GEM. I'm sure Levine, who actually has a clue about trips, was thrilled. I know I was.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-12-2009, 11:07 AM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
Watch his ride on Buddy's Humor last out. It was a GEM. I'm sure Levine, who actually has a clue about trips, was thrilled. I know I was.
That was undoubtedly a bad ride, but they happen. I don't think you can label Lezcano based on that ride as he seems to be pretty solid overall.

NT
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.