|
|
 |
|
#21
10-02-2009, 01:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson 
|
|
#27
10-02-2009, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#29
10-02-2009, 03:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Northern suburbs.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#30
10-02-2009, 03:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
should have said down 'there.' BTW the orange uni's gave them away
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#31
10-02-2009, 03:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If only Abe Froman went.
|
|
#32
10-02-2009, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, the IOC = the world.
|
|
#33
10-02-2009, 06:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But my guess is you and everyone else who will try to score that point already know that. If it's a slap at anything, it's at the way the country has been arrogantly handled since 2000. I'm not sure that the IOC not giving the U.S. the Olympics was predicated on the last 8 months, or Obama. Something tells me that it's not the last eight months of American leadership that made Chicago lose. To be perfectly intellectually honest (something you may want to try sometime in situations like this), something tells me it has nothing at all to do with the last President either, even if that is an infinitely more likely scenario if we're inclined to place blame on that office. The fact that it was going to be a gigantic clusterf*ck of massive proportions from a logistical perspective is probably the "prohibitive" frontrunner for real reason why Chicago didn't get it. But why worry about things like that when a pathetic attempt at scoring cheap political points is just so much fun?! I understand the impulse, I really do.
|
|
#34
10-02-2009, 06:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Love my home town, but not the place for a summer Olympics. Rather glad they didn't get it.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|
|
#35
10-02-2009, 06:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brian,
Score political points? **** political points. Businesses are in the fetal position and I have to hear about Cash for Clunkers and green shoots... Sure Bush sucked and ruinined America's image. I don't think people were voting for the same policies when Obama took over. He has been awful. And I voted for Nader, so I'm no righty.
|
|
#36
10-02-2009, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh wait, nothing. If your response to everything I typed was only what you just typed back, I guess for lack of a nicer way of putting it, what's your f*cking point?
|
|
#37
10-02-2009, 07:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess my point would be that right now, our president shouldn't be hobnobbing in Denmark or on Letterman's couch or making another ESPN commercial. That's my point.
|
|
#38
10-02-2009, 07:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|
|
#39
10-02-2009, 07:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But that would have been another thread. Your point above is valid enough, I suppose, if that's your point....so why try to paint it as, how did you put it, "world gives Obama a big F U?" You've yet to do anything to back that point up at all....your personal criticism of his policy actually has nothing to do with what you alleged at the beginning.
|
|
#40
10-02-2009, 07:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I get to hear about green shoots and less bad and.....http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=ajY2EJWqg3ZE
U.S. Unemployment Now Lasts Longer Than Benefits: Chart of Day Share | Email | Print | A A A By Michael McKee and Alex Tanzi Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) -- For the first time, the average amount of time it takes fired employees to find a new job exceeds the length of their standard unemployment benefits. The CHART OF THE DAY shows the average duration of unemployment is now 26.2 weeks, longer than the 26 weeks of state benefits normally provided to workers who lose their jobs. It’s the first time that has occurred since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began keeping records in 1948. The jobless rate rose to 9.8 percent in September, while payrolls fell by 263,000, a Labor Department report showed today in Washington. Congress has extended unemployment benefits twice -- first in July 2008 and then as part of the stimulus bill signed in February. Currently, the unemployed are eligible for a total of 46 weeks of benefits, and those in states where the unemployment rate is more than 6 percent are eligible for 59 weeks. Those additional benefits expire at the end of the year, and about 1.3 million people will exhaust them by then, according to the National Employment Law Project. An extension of benefits, which was passed by the House of Representatives, is being held up in the Senate by lawmakers who object because their states would be excluded from the plan. The purple line on the chart shows 5.4 million people have now been out of work for at least 27 weeks, representing 35.6 percent of the total number of unemployed, the most since the agency began keeping statistics in 1948. ,
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
