Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:30 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default Supreme Court Nominee Sotomayor

Not all democrats are fans of Sotomayor:

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...3-04e10199a085

Here is a snippet from the article: The most consistent concern was that Sotomayor, although an able lawyer, was "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench," as one former Second Circuit clerk for another judge put it. "She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue." (During one argument, an elderly judicial colleague is said to have leaned over and said, "Will you please stop talking and let them talk?")
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:05 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm8kJ...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:17 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

What a surprise....lol! It will be interesting to see the conservatives justify opposition after a number of them voted to confirm her in the past. Looking forward to a lot of crap...like she's a bully...lol again! Better they celebrate their "victory" against civil rights in California!
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:50 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost
What a surprise....lol! It will be interesting to see the conservatives justify opposition after a number of them voted to confirm her in the past. Looking forward to a lot of crap...like she's a bully...lol again! Better they celebrate their "victory" against civil rights in California!
In case you didn't notice, the article was from a liberal newspaper.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:53 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

Not responding to the specific article, merely predicting the politics of the future. Obviously I love the quandary the right finds itself in....
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:04 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost
What a surprise....lol! It will be interesting to see the conservatives justify opposition after a number of them voted to confirm her in the past. Looking forward to a lot of crap...like she's a bully...lol again! Better they celebrate their "victory" against civil rights in California!

that is a shame
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:10 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
that is a shame
and i just saw this on my home page:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30936298/


The court said the people have a right, through the ballot box, to change their constitution.

"In a sense, petitioners' and the attorney general's complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it," the ruling said.


they're bound to uphold what? a constitution that can be changed at a whim? based on a vote? i hope our u.s. constitution is more airtight than that!! the majority isn't supposed to rule, with the ability to gang up on an outnumbered minority, and take their rights away.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:26 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
and i just saw this on my home page:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30936298/


The court said the people have a right, through the ballot box, to change their constitution.

"In a sense, petitioners' and the attorney general's complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it," the ruling said.


they're bound to uphold what? a constitution that can be changed at a whim? based on a vote? i hope our u.s. constitution is more airtight than that!! the majority isn't supposed to rule, with the ability to gang up on an outnumbered minority, and take their rights away.

The Constitution can be amended of course, but not merely at a whim...it takes a lengthy process, years and years for common sense and decency to hopefully prevail. The California court was gutless...hardly unexpected. Rather than run into Constitutional issues, they let 18000 marriages stand but deny the same equality to others. The right says they support equal rights, as long as they are separate....now where have we heard that before?
A local woman wrote a letter to the Chambersburg newspaper in which, intermingled with a lot of psuedo-Christian references, she made the statement that "gays" had no right to the word "marriage" as "everyone" knows that "marriage" is a Christian word....do you laugh or cry?
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:06 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost
What a surprise....lol! It will be interesting to see the conservatives justify opposition after a number of them voted to confirm her in the past. Looking forward to a lot of crap...like she's a bully...lol again! Better they celebrate their "victory" against civil rights in California!
Obama is opposed to same-sex marriages. Does that make Obama against civil rights?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:26 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Obama is opposed to same-sex marriages. Does that make Obama against civil rights?

I'm pretty sure Obama will have his thumb in the air when it comes to this issue.

Whichever way the public is going at that particular time is what he will support.

Very Clinton-esque.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-26-2009, 04:01 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Obama is opposed to same-sex marriages. Does that make Obama against civil rights?

Yes
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-26-2009, 08:51 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
LOL ..What was it that he said (that made her lose it for real?) I can't understand what he said.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPiwC...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-26-2009, 09:14 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

This can be turned around at the ballot box in California (if it's an off year election.) Problem with that is it can be reversed at the ballot box by the Conservatives(in a heavy Presidential election.) It's a form of discrimination(based on the sex of the two people involved.) It's an interesting situation here, because Democratic Blacks and Latinos usually vote against gays. The Gays pick up some support from the money Conservatives(dat be you, Honu.)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2009, 12:42 AM
timmgirvan's Avatar
timmgirvan timmgirvan is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Powder Springs Ga
Posts: 5,780
Default

Well......it's not like we didn't know he would pick a liberal judge!....I've seen some plusses and minuses to her being on the Court, if her history is any indication. Too early to tell now,though.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-27-2009, 07:22 AM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
This can be turned around at the ballot box in California (if it's an off year election.) Problem with that is it can be reversed at the ballot box by the Conservatives(in a heavy Presidential election.) It's a form of discrimination(based on the sex of the two people involved.) It's an interesting situation here, because Democratic Blacks and Latinos usually vote against gays. The Gays pick up some support from the money Conservatives(dat be you, Honu.)

Maybe but if the Mormons flood the anti-gay marriage pool with their money again its going to be a long haul.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-27-2009, 10:59 AM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

I couldn't put my hand on why I liked this Obama appointee so much considering how I feel about most all things Obama but then it came to me. This woman is the spitting image of my grade school lunch lady who used to slip us extra cookies.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-26-2009, 09:14 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
That judge is quite attractive imo.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-26-2009, 06:39 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Not all democrats are fans of Sotomayor:

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.ht...3-04e10199a085

Here is a snippet from the article: The most consistent concern was that Sotomayor, although an able lawyer, was "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench," as one former Second Circuit clerk for another judge put it. "She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue." (During one argument, an elderly judicial colleague is said to have leaned over and said, "Will you please stop talking and let them talk?")
A clerk said that... another Judge's clerk... good source.

Her academic record says the exactly the opposite.
As does her work as a circuit judge. She
has very well written opinions that are well thought
out. And she is clearly liberal. The real sticking point.

She does like to argue. But it is much more constructive
and much less bullying than Scalia. And I am sorry, if Clarence
Thomas gets in with extremely modest credentials, this lady is
a lock if it is a question of brains.

The Republicans are going to have to find a pubic hair
on a glass to get this blocked. They need dirt. They
will have to fillibuster. The Democrats would be wise to let
them. Since Obama has been elected it is a party with no ideas
and nothing but destructive intentions. That status will continue.

The Republicans should be touting that the surge in Iraq did
do its job, when Democrats said it would fail. The Republicans
should say their strategy to get the local Iraqis to handle the
problems have worked. Where are the positives?

Lead in with good ideas on domestic issues or get out of the way.

Last edited by pgardn : 05-26-2009 at 09:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.