#41
|
||||
|
||||
You said accurate speed figures do exactly what they purport to do (I agree with you on this)- I was pointing out that these were not accurate relative to what Beyer had striven to achieve when he created them.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
i didn't, apparently you are not paying attention, i conceded that point to you that that is a newer addition to the form that i think is valuable because it is an accurate statement of the facts and not someone's opinion.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I need to know your thoughts as I'm waiting with baited breath for your Preakness picks. I mean, after all, this is your handiwork: NT |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, well I used Super Saver from the start in the tvg fantasy contest.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I was referring to the notion of any relevence of track bias in speed figures.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
I'm very confused by a lot of things in this thread. People keep saying things they don't really seem to mean....how can a moron like me be expected to keep up?
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As for my Preak pick, who's in it? However if you ask who had one of the better 3 yr old performances at CD this meet, it wasn't even in the Derby. Hurricane Ike looked as good as any yesterday if he can go the Preakness distance. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Fair enough.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Still I don't get how the derby was assigned a 104, that's fine I will gladly stick to not knowing and use this as leverage when people do blindly bet to this relatively "high" number.
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Derby horses are overbet regardless of whether the number is 120 or 90.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
What was the figure for Pickapocket's allowance win (8.5F in 1:43.2)?
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Ok, can someone who routinely uses speed figures, doesn't bash them, and has a somewhat cursory to average understanding of how they are made get an explanation of how on Earth that Derby receives a 104?
Because it's not about bashing Beyer, it's not about bashing the number, it's that the number seems way out of line...and I don't understand how it was made on this particular day or the reasoning behind it. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
means stupid in Latin |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
99
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
If that's the case, and assuming the Derby figure is relative to the other two-turn races on the card, if the Derby figure were "off," it's probably only at best a length or two off.
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
The explanation of arriving at 104
From Beyer's Washington Post Column:
Super Saver's winning tine of 2:04.45 was the slowest since 1989. The Churchill Downs racing strip was slow, of course, but even when the track condition is taken into account, the race still produced a modest Beyer Speed Figure of 104, the second-lowest for the Derby in 20 years. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...16.html?sub=AR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|