![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Is Seattle Slew not great because he ran poorly in the Hollywood race? Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#82
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The debute of an overnight stakes at Oaklawn called "The Smarty Jones" is scheduled for Monday 1/21. They will be handing out Smarty Jones bobble horses to those in attendance. Regular fans of this meet will remember a lot of horses who came through Hot Springs on their three year old campaign, but probably none will be more remembered than Smarty. John Servis won a lot of fans too with how he made himself accessible to the media and the fans. Hopefully some day he'll get another shot. Stew, oh well, Stew is Stew. I must agree that his best win was the Preakness.
![]() |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Smarty Jones, Afleet Alex, Bernardini, Barbaro or Curlin? |
#84
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Barbaro is sort of hard though in my heart I think he was the best because of his abilities on both surfaces. Seems pretty cut and dried after that......Curlin, Bernardini, Smarty Jones and Afleet Alex. I actually probably liked Afleet Alex but he is pretty clearly the last of that group. No disgrace, they're all pretty damn good. I also wouldn't argue with anyone who put Bernardini ahead of Curlin. That seems arguable. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
none were " great " Curlin Barbaro Smarty Bernie Alex |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#88
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't know about that. Bernardini lost a race to Invasor where he was best and Invasor was most likely better than anyone Curlin beat at 1 1/4. Hey, I'm a Street Sense fan but he's no world beater. Bernardini was a vastly superior horse to him. |
#90
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
2. SJ T3. Barbaro T3. Bernardini T5. Alex Not separated by a whole lot. You could make arguments for each. Hell, Alex was the only one to win a G1 at 2 AND 3 (let alone multiple graded stakes!) He only gets downgraded for the horrible competition he faced and generally lower figures. I despised Curlin and still do but respect him nonetheless.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#91
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]() hard to rate them, as only one faced older with a win, curlin. and another tugs at the heart, and isn't as proven, as barbaro wasn't able to stay in competition. of course he did plenty in the short time he had, winning the derby over what was called the deepest field in years, after showing he was a top turf performer.
curlin imo accomplished the most, smarty was undefeated til his second in the belmont--and raced at varying tracks and distances. but i don't know that the crop he ran against stacks up to the 06 or 07 crops. afleet alex i would also put at the bottom. didn't do as well before the t.c. and i feel that crop also lacked depth. barbaro/curlin smarty bernardini i had bernardini ahead of smarty, but then remembered that bernardini only raced one year-i think that matters. and unlike smarty, he lost his debut.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think all things being equal, Bernardini's effort in the BC Classic would have given Curlin a very hard time. Plus, Bernardini's Preakness win extremely impressive. I think the two are relative equals, and like I said, could argue either side. I rated Curlin ahead of Bernardini. It's close. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
hell, there are people who will argue that alydar was better than affirmed, and easy goer was better than sunday silence-even tho the record is pretty overwhelming to show otherwise.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think it speaks volumes about the quintet that we all had Alex last.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I tend to agree with BTW that Barbaro was the "best" of the bunch. Smarty Jones and Barbaro are the only two that I didn't see in person, but Curlin is BY FAR the most visually impressive horse I have ever seen up close. Not just for that reason, but I would tend to put him second, because of his ability to fight (and with one exception) win stretch duels. I'm not sure that I can separate the other three because in my mind when each of them were presented with a challenge, they lost... be it Smarty to Birdstone, Alex in the Derby or Bernardini to Invasor... Now in all three of their cases I think they were compromised by jockeys, but in my heart, I think that Barbaro and Curlin would have found a way to win that Derby, that Belmont or that Classic, and thus put them at the top of this list...
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() That being said...was Bellamy Road's performance in the Wood great? |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Without question. But, I also believe he was one of the most talented horses I have ever seen. Unfortunately, he never got a fair chance to show it. Shocking that Ed Sexton wasn't able to prolong his career. |
#99
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I disagree with you when you say that the extremely wet track in the Derby makes that race "moot" in any discussion of the horse's greatness. I think the ability to win on different types of tracks probably should be one element considered when determining a horse's greatness. The fact that Smarty actually picked up his feet and ran in that slop (while horses like Birdstone and Borrego didn't bother running a step) seems like a valid and important point in favor of those that argue he is in fact "great." |
#100
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
2) Curlin 3) Smarty Jones 4) Afleet Alex 5) Last and least....Bernardini. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|