Here's a shock

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

lol, I know you were kidding

Just wanted to make sure that if you didn't know who he was, you got a good feel for what kind of loudmouth, dishonest, blowhard he was.

It's like this every time he's on TV.

I agree but I thought you like Obama. Glad you are coming around to my way of thinking

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by GBBob

AP soon? Got one going Friday and Saturday

Probably won't make the trip anytime soon

Good luck

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

I agree but I thought you like Obama. Glad you are coming around to my way of thinking

Not as clever as it may have seemed in your head.

[Danzig]

http://www.slate.com/id/2261271/

The Lynching of Shirley SherrodThe human price of indiscriminate politics.
By William Saletan
Posted Wednesday, July 21, 2010, at 7:38 PM ET

Twenty-four years ago, Shirley Sherrod helped Roger Spooner save his farm. She was black, and he was white, but they were more than that. They were two people working together to keep a South Georgia family on its land.

This week, they were flattened into a political cartoon. To score points in a fight between the Tea Party and the NAACP over which side is "racist," Sherrod and Spooner were caricatured: she as a black bigot, he as a white dupe. The nuances of their story were erased.


and further down in the article:

The video never supported the accusation. It dealt with events 23 years before Sherrod's federal appointment. Nevertheless, it destroyed her. It was replayed everywhere. The NAACP denounced her. The USDA forced her to resign. Nobody asked her to explain herself or looked at her job performance to see whether she had practiced discrimination. The video was enough. The NAACP, having secured the right of all people to sit at the front of the bus, threw Sherrod under it. In his statement, NAACP President Ben Jealous claimed "she gave no indication she had attempted to right the wrong she had done" to Spooner.

But there were many indications that she had righted her wrong. The evidence was in the memories of Spooner and his wife and in the full video of Sherrod's speech, which the NAACP possessed but hadn't bothered to consult. The Spooners began to correct the record, explaining how Sherrod had followed up and saved their farm. Tuesday evening, the NAACP posted the full video of her speech, demonstrating that after Breitbart's excerpt ended, Sherrod had gone on to describe what she did for Spooner when his white lawyer failed to help:

"I spent time there in my office calling everybody I could think so to try to see—help me find the lawyer who would handle this. … Working with him made me see that it's really about those who have versus those who don't. You know—and they could be black, and they could be white. They could be Hispanic. And it made me realize then that I needed to work to help poor people. … God helped me to see that it's not just about black people. It's about poor people. … I've come to realize that we have to work together. … We have to get to the point, as Toni Morrison said, [where] race exists, but it doesn't matter."

These wise and moving words had been excised from the original clip. They gave the real context of Sherrod's remarks—what had happened 24 years ago between her and Spooner and what she had learned from it—not the fake political context in which, to Breitbart, she was just another weapon.





--i read that Sherrod may sue Breitbart. many times i think we are too litigious a society, but in this case, i hope she sues the pants off him.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

--i read that Sherrod may sue Breitbart. many times i think we are too litigious a society, but in this case, i hope she sues the pants off him.

on what grounds? putting up a video cut but not altered?

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

on what grounds? putting up a video cut but not altered?

it would be his comments on the video he selectively edited that would get him in trouble. if she can prove he knowingly misrepresented the content of her speech and prove damages (getting fired?), she might have a case.

i'm not sure what venue the case would be brought in or the specifics of libel law in that state but it's not outside the realm of possibility. libel cases are really tough to prove if you're a public figure. but she wasn't. at least until he dragged her through the mud.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

on what grounds? putting up a video cut but not altered?

so, you read the article?
his actions resulted in her being fired, almost ruined. her reputation dragged thru the mud. then there are those who heard the initial story, but nothing since-so they assume the original story is correct.

breitbart didn't give a damn about the truth, all he cared about was trying to prove a point-her life be damned as far as he was concerned. i hope she sues him and wins huge.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

--i read that Sherrod may sue Breitbart. many times i think we are too litigious a society, but in this case, i hope she sues the pants off him.

Agree with that.