Meltdown??

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Just can't believe the big shyt-covered tarp of unaccountability that people try to put up. 2 weeks ago, they'd of said it was safe, and now they say it was a risk people should be happy to take. Love the quick pivot (so Chantal.)

i didn't have all that much of an opinion 2 weeks ago other than i liked for my dark spaces to be illuminated when i flipped the switch up.

i just can't believe all the highly qualified interweb nuclear engineers that didn't know this plant existed 2 weeks ago but are now positive it shouldn't have been put where it was.

I'm more upset with the fact that there wasn't a gigantic storage facility for fuel in a nearby hill.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i didn't have all that much of an opinion 2 weeks ago other than i liked for my dark spaces to be illuminated when i flipped the switch up.

i just can't believe all the highly qualified interweb nuclear engineers that didn't know this plant existed 2 weeks ago but are now positive it shouldn't have been put where it was.

Well, lets all just give a left nut to the Gov't and the Nuclear Industry. Again, if you (and others) had this "shut up it's risky" attitude before this took place, I wouldn't mind that you have it now. What you (and other maggots) do is claim it's safe, and (when it's obvious something really wasn't safe) you quickly pivot to this "necessary risk" bullshyt. You'll do whatever is most convenient for you....FK OFF, MAGGOT!

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Well, lets all just give a left nut to the Gov't and the Nuclear Industry. Again, if you (and others) had this "shut up it's risky" attitude before this took place, I wouldn't mind that you have it now. What you (and other maggots) do is claim it's safe, and (when it's obvious something really wasn't safe) you quickly pivot to this "necessary risk" bullshyt. You'll do whatever is most convenient for you....FK OFF, MAGGOT!

i didn't have the "shut up, it's risky" attitude before it happened because i don't pretend to have had any attitude other than i like having enough spare power to argue with pompous know-it-all's on the internet.

i have it now only because you pretend to have superior after the fact opinions. which are about as useful as listening to someone who didn't bet him pointing out how giacomo was an overlay after the race.

please pontificate more on this subject.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i didn't have the "shut up, it's risky" attitude before it happened because i don't pretend to have had any attitude other than i like having enough spare power to argue with pompous know-it-all's on the internet.

i have it now only because you pretend to have superior after the fact opinions. which are about as useful as listening to someone who didn't bet him pointing out how giacomo was an overlay after the race.

please pontificate more on this subject.

You know, something is very wrong with you. I have never figured out exactly what it is, but it's some kind of "don't get ahead of me" thing (which I can't relate to.) You're all about who is in some sort of lead, and couching your arguments to try to negate that lead. You're a rebounder. Your opinions are built in response to someone else's opinion on something. You don't really have any set opinions. I don't "pretend" to have opinions. That's your shyt. You do that. I would much rather talk to Conservatives that have actual opinions (based on something they actually believe,) than talk to some sicko Chameleon type that's trying to fit their opinion to counter someone else's opinion. Not saying you're the only one like this, but you got a bad case of it.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

You know, something is very wrong with you. I have never figured out exactly what it is, but it's some kind of "don't get ahead of me" thing (which I can't relate to.) You're all about who is in some sort of lead, and couching your arguments to try to negate that lead. You're a rebounder. Your opinions are built in response to someone else's opinion on something. I don't know what this condition is called, but it ain't going away.

i think it's called "responding to what the other person said".

it could be a serious condition. but i hope not.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i think it's called "responding to what the other person said".

it could be a serious condition. but i hope not.

I think it's called undermining. I'm not stupid. I will figure it out, because I am tired of your shyt.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I think it's called undermining. I'm not stupid. I will figure it out, because I am tired of your shyt.

you take this way too seriously.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

you take this way too seriously.

Bullshyt.. See, when I point out your actions, you try to turn it (I'm taking something too seriously.) Some sort of insecurity, competitiveness etc. causes you to try to undermine people. You're the type that will try to get a successful dieter to stop losing their weight. Then, if they gain, you'll hint that they need to lose weight.... Sick pup.

[geeker2]

I think if either or both of you guys would post "Why I was raised a Republican" it would help the rest of us understand your posts much better

[hi_im_god]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM