Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:04 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default young teen girls charged with child porn of themselves

http://www.wpxi.com/news/18469160/detail.html#-

Interesting ramifications. The 14 and 15 year old girls sent nude pictures of them selves by cell phone to a 16 and 17 year old boy.

Police said the girls are being charged with manufacturing, disseminating or possessing child pornography while the boys face charges of possession.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:10 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
http://www.wpxi.com/news/18469160/detail.html#-

Interesting ramifications. The 14 and 15 year old girls sent nude pictures of them selves by cell phone to a 16 and 17 year old boy.

Police said the girls are being charged with manufacturing, disseminating or possessing child pornography while the boys face charges of possession.

they are teenagers... they would not have been arrested for if the girls would have just got naked in front of the boys.. now they will have this stuff on their records, and it will follow them for the rest of their lives...

If a 30 year old has naked pics of 14 & 15 year olds on his phone that is one thing... but the classmates who they are probably boyfriend and girlfriend with?

I hope they beat the case.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:11 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
http://www.wpxi.com/news/18469160/detail.html#-

Interesting ramifications. The 14 and 15 year old girls sent nude pictures of them selves by cell phone to a 16 and 17 year old boy.

Police said the girls are being charged with manufacturing, disseminating or possessing child pornography while the boys face charges of possession.
Now you know how Santorum got elected.


"That's what happens when you give a Catholic power."
-Coach Pants
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:30 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default

The bigger sex crime here, may be that of any police, detective or lawyer that must see the pictures. I certainly would insist on seeing the evidence.

What justification is there for any adult to view these pics, as it would be a greater "crime" than any committed so far by a few naked kids looking at a few other naked kids


Looks like here we need to define pornography a bit better
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:40 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Yeah, some pretty amazing logic here. Looking at pictures of 14/15yo girls is wrong so let's pass them around among school officials, the police station, and then the courts. Then you have child pornography charges based largely to protect underage people from being exploited but now we are going to further exploit them and press charges against them for exploiting themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:42 PM
TheSpyder's Avatar
TheSpyder TheSpyder is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nothing could be finer
Posts: 5,130
Default

I think a good lawyer should go after whoever seized the phones and thought it was OK to go through the pictures. They are the real criminals for invasion of privicy and underage porn
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2009, 05:05 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpyder
I think a good lawyer should go after whoever seized the phones and thought it was OK to go through the pictures. They are the real criminals for invasion of privicy and underage porn



RIGHT ON
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2009, 05:16 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

'Police said school officials learned of the photos in October. That's when a student was seen using a cell phone during school hours, which violates school rules. The phone was seized, and the photos were found on it, police said. When police investigated, other phones with more pictures were seized.'


who at the school took it upon themselves to search thru the phone? just because they are students doesn't mean they don't have civil rights, which quite possibly were violated. illegal search and seizure to begin with, also privacy laws.
should be interesting to see how this turns out.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2009, 05:23 PM
letswastemoney's Avatar
letswastemoney letswastemoney is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 2,561
Default

Teen girls will get naked no matter what you do. It's a waste of money to fight something like that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2009, 07:11 PM
Mike's Avatar
Mike Mike is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by letswastemoney
Teen girls will get naked no matter what you do. It's a waste of money to fight something like that.

Lord knows this is true. I usually just give in to the post pubescent ones, I don't want no trouble. you know?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2009, 07:16 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

i believe the saying is '16 will get you 20'
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:37 PM
skippy3481 skippy3481 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Default

This is the law going wayyy to far. Let them enjoy being young. It's not like they were selling them on the internet or sending them to gpk. Let the parents deal with this.
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:40 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy3481
This is the law going wayyy to far. Let them enjoy being young. It's not like they were selling them on the internet or sending them to gpk. Let the parents deal with this.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:52 PM
skippy3481 skippy3481 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Default

no gfy. I'm saddened plus i know you like them with a little seasoning the old creaking back can't handle the young ones anymore
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:54 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy3481
no gfy. I'm saddened plus i know you like them with a little seasoning the old creaking back can't handle the young ones anymore
GFY
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:55 PM
skippy3481 skippy3481 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Default

haha good to hear from ya man we still have to grab a beer sometime. You going to toga this year?
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-13-2009, 08:57 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy3481
haha good to hear from ya man we still have to grab a beer sometime. You going to toga this year?

Toga is still up in the air right now. Good to hear from you too.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-13-2009, 09:06 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy3481
no gfy. I'm saddened plus i know you like them with a little seasoning the old creaking back can't handle the young ones anymore
the biggest problem with young ones is having to listen to them....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-13-2009, 09:07 PM
skippy3481 skippy3481 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Default

Ya my wife is young but shes a saint, she puts up with me. kev, when are you thinking about going?
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:25 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy3481
Ya my wife is young but shes a saint, she puts up with me. kev, when are you thinking about going?

If I go, it would be opening week.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.