NHL under review

[Alabama Stakes]

They must use the same meatheads as thE NFL or NCAA.

St. Louis scores great goal . They say it was offsides like 10 seconds before. Wasn't even offsides either .

Bruins had a goal clearly in the net in stop action video . Put it on the big screen . Ice got pelted ... What are they looking at ?

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Alabama Stakes

They must use the same meatheads as thE NFL or NCAA.

St. Louis scores great goal . They say it was offsides like 10 seconds before. Wasn't even offsides either .

Bruins had a goal clearly in the net in stop action video . Put it on the big screen . Ice got pelted ... What are they looking at ?

Yeah..I'm biased, but he was offside. Would never have been called 5 years ago but if you are going to initiate video, then you have to abide by it.

Listening to Hitchcock whine about that after they got the luckiest goal ever in OT Game one was pretty laughable.

[3kings]

I thought both reviewed calls were correct. The difference between the teams is the Blackhawks know how to win. They remained composed and the Blues took a frustration penalty that led to the winning goal.

[Alabama Stakes]

Originally Posted by 3kings

I thought both reviewed calls were correct. The difference between the teams is the Blackhawks know how to win. They remained composed and the Blues took a frustration penalty that led to the winning goal.

Pucks in the air... Foots in the air. How's that indisputable?