Should Hillary have been charged in email scandal?

[joeydb]

The FBI has made the announcement: there will be no charges.

The statement also said that there was extremely careless handling of classified information. She put our national security at risk.

What do you guys think?

[casp0555]

probably the same way he thinks....

hires_petraeus3d.jpg
fixed it myself

[mclem0822]

No

[mclem0822]

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/brief...3/email-facts/

[Danzig]

The fbi reccommended no charges. Still up to doj.
But maybe they should investigate eight more times to be sure..

And being careless is not illegal. Laws have to be clearly defined. Unless there was a law on the books at the time she was at state that defined careless emailing, etc, they cannot charge for that.

The six thus far who voted she should have been charged...what should she have been charged with? And what makes you better informed and capable than the fbi??

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by casp0555

probably the same way he thinks....

Attachment 2633
fixed it myself

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

Cuz in the land of the brain dead, any critism of Clinton is automatically support for Trump. Keep it Simple for the Stupid.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

Any problem at all with the fact that she kept and deleted emails on a separate sever to purposely avoid FOIA and broke the Federal Records Act? Or just happy that the most corrupt administration in the history of the republic let her walk?

[mclem0822]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Any problem at all with the fact that she kept and deleted emails on a separate sever to purposely avoid FOIA and broke the Federal Records Act? Or just happy that the most corrupt administration in the history of the republic let her walk?

Sorry but this is one thing you cannot blame the BUSH CRIME FAMILY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR, so let's leave them out!

[Danzig]

Harding is one usually mentioned re corruption.

As for bush, mclem....


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/12/bush200712


Clinton had left President Bush in an ideal position to pursue such policies. Remember the presidential debates in 2000 between Al Gore and George Bush, and how the two men argued over how to spend America’s anticipated $2.2 trillion budget surplus? The country could well have afforded to ramp up domestic investment in key areas. In fact, doing so would have staved off recession in the short run while spurring growth in the long run.

But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000—more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by mclem0822

Sorry but this is one thing you cannot blame the BUSH CRIME FAMILY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR, so let's leave them out!

...true story..

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Harding is one usually mentioned re corruption.

As for bush, mclem....


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/12/bush200712


Clinton had left President Bush in an ideal position to pursue such policies. Remember the presidential debates in 2000 between Al Gore and George Bush, and how the two men argued over how to spend America’s anticipated $2.2 trillion budget surplus? The country could well have afforded to ramp up domestic investment in key areas. In fact, doing so would have staved off recession in the short run while spurring growth in the long run.

But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000—more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American.

Quit picken on my boy Dumya:...that's my job

[Rudeboyelvis]

>>>SHE SKATES...BUT FOR HOW LONG?

Even by Clintonian corruption standards, this was quick: only seven days between the Phoenix airport tarmac tango between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Hillary Clinton's exoneration by the FBI Director James Comey. This must set a new world record for land speed corruption.

Comey laid out an entire case of criminal intent and action, and then declined to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton, saying "no reasonable prosecutor" would take up the case. Never mind that it is not his job to determine that. Clearly, Comey didn't want to be the guy who recommended charges against the presumptive Democrat nominee.

Well, if you don't want to be that guy, then you shouldn't be the FBI Director.

Despite this grotesque and obvious display of corruption, there is a significant upside. And it's an upside that Mrs. Clinton may not see, because global elites cannot and will not see it.

Every time members of the bipartisan ruling class protect each other, normal citizens, who are constantly being ground into the ground by those same elites, grow ever-more enraged.

The betrayal, which already runs deep, becomes an even greater driver for change. Witness Brexit: the global elites lectured the British people condescendingly about the wisdom of staying in the European Union--primarily as a way to protect their own power, influence and wealth. The British people told them to take a hike. They had had enough.

And so it may very well be here in America. Comey, Obama, Lynch, the Clintons...the elitist cabal that just let her skate may well face their own reckoning in November. They just gave Donald Trump three months' worth of campaign material. All he has to say is: "See? I told you she was crooked. And if you think this was bad, wait until you see the magnitude of corruption at the Clinton Foundation. I told you the system is rigged. I told you the global elites protect each other. The whole dirty system and all of the dirty players need to be removed root and branch---and I'm the only one who can do it. And I promsie you, I will."

That message is extremely powerful---even moreso when coupled with a strong pro-growth economic plan and a national security strategy to rebuild the military and fight the war against Islamic supremacism the way it should be fought.

So while Hillary and Obama chuckle up a storm about how they all got away with it, the American people's rage is rising. And just ask the British people what full-on rage can accomplish.<<<


https://www.facebook.com/MonicaCrowl...13079918725294


Good luck with Independent voters that already think she's too corrupt, evil, dumb or incompetent to hold the office. I agree with all points made - the left is far too ignorant and blind to see what they've just done to themselves.

But to be fair, it's a Washington thing, not a party thing. Trump records the most Republican primary votes in the history of the republic, whilst the right just sat back and laughed.

Shades of 1980 all over again.

[Danzig]

While discussing ethics......
I have seen next to nothing mentioned about two suits against the prrsumptive nominee for fraud. One in calidornia, one in new york...and then two suits quashed in fla and tx after donations made to two campaigns.

At any rate, its a damn shame our two main parties have people with questionable judgement or worse, vying to be president. The money men sure have set up one hell of a system.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

While discussing ethics......
I have seen next to nothing mentioned about two suits against the prrsumptive nominee for fraud. One in calidornia, one in new york...and then two suits quashed in fla and tx after donations made to two campaigns.

At any rate, its a damn shame our two main parties have people with questionable judgement or worse, vying to be president. The money men sure have set up one hell of a system.

But no one was discussing ethics. We are discussing a tyrannical abuse of power at the highest level of this administration.

A lil' different than getting your panties in a knot over a couple of unhappy Trump University students...but I digress.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

>>>To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.<<<

Let that sink in a moment.

When the Government is above the law, the Citizens are below the law.

That's Tyranny.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

But no one was discussing ethics. We are discussing a tyrannical abuse of power at the highest level of the former administration.



>>>To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.<<<

Let that sink in a moment.

When the Government is above the law, the Citizens are below the law.

That's Tyranny.

You are talking about the Dumya Bush years, right

[Danzig]

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57...b0416464114ff2

A man of integrity...until he didnt do what the gop wanted?

[bigrun]

The media reaction to George W. Bush's email controversy

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...l-controversy/

The George W. Bush email scandal the media has conveniently forgotten

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the_...otten_partner/

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by bigrun

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...l-controversy/






http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/the_...otten_partner/

That is all completely different, cuz..... (R). And because it is not a clinton

[OldDog]

...met for over 3 hours with 5 attorneys present and Comey said they did not record or save a transcript. You know, just like anyone else