#61
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It looks like Todd Urbina gets Matt's winnings. |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
So did DRF cover his entry?
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations, guys. Very impressive work!
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
It looks like he can accept his winnings but not a seat at the NHC Championships. Well that's a bummer, but at least he can still give his money away.
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
I loathe your avatar Pants!
What a tool, that guy. |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Who is it?
At first I thought it was Horatio Kane from CSI: Miami.
__________________
Tod Marks Photo - Daybreak over Oklahoma |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So, my approach in the Juv Fillies was to play the race to collapse on the front end. The ability to bet outside of one's normal bankroll allows you to cautiously cover more bases. I structured a trifecta play in the Juv Fillies using Top Decile, Majestic Presence and Wonder Gal that allowed two of them to finish in the money and still cash. So, Take Charge Brandi holding on was OK as long as two of that trio finished 2nd and 3rd. With Wonder Gal winning the photo, we had $2 on the trifecta. After a minor hit in the FM Turf, we were in position to maximize a strong opinion, which was that Judy the Beauty was strictly the horse to beat and that longshots were viable for underneath slots. One of those was Better Lucky, who filled out the exacta, and the all spot in 3rd facilitated having Thank You Marylou. We ended up with $11 on the trifecta. The Mile was a race we planned on passing, but being in 4th overall going into that race, something had to be tried. We had agreed beforehand that the Euros held a huge advantage here and were unfazed by their lack of success up to that point. Thus, a trifecta was structured that included Karakontie, Anodin, Veda, Mustajeeb and Trade Storm. When three of that group of five made up the trifecta, it gave us $4 on it. My opinion in the Classic was bad. I loved Tonalist, felt like Bayern would not be able to stay, and wanted to try and use longshots underneath. That obviously did not come to fruition and we ended up losing about 15% of what we had going into that race. We could have sat on our hands there and tried to leapfrog by simply standing pat. That goes against my grain, so we made a play. While it did not work out and we actually lost two spots in the standings, it did not in any way take away from the entire experience of the day. What contests like the BCBC remind you of is the superiority of live money tournaments. I have had success in $2 WP formats, but have far too often been left frustrated when a seemingly hopeless longshot that someone would have never actually bet galloped home and allowed those "stabbers" to take full advantage. Nothing against their approach, but it seldom feels like "handicapping." Having to back up your opinions with wagers levels the playing field, at least for me. I look forward to the NHC and hopefully one of the DT contingent doing well! |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
Lane Kiffin
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Congrats to you and to Paul! |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I also agree with your sentiments on live bankroll contests... My one complaint with the BCBC is that the BCQualify method is not a reflection of the ultimate contest. I wish that format could somehow incorporate something beyond the WP wagering format. I also wonder if it's possible to link the top 25 or so to the method used to qualify...I wonder if those that have success in the BCBC final contest are more frequently coming from live tournaments as opposed to BCQualify. |
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Nick on Derby Wars ~ Horse Racing Nation
(He's having trouble with his Skype ) http://www.ustream.tv/channel/horseracingnation |