#61
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Saturday -200 -60 -60 -60 -60 -360 -150 -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 -150 -360 -150 -180 -250 -144 -420 (-$3404) Sunday -252 -200 -100 -100 -100 -100 -180 -60 -48 -100 -100 +880 -135 -200 -200 -200 -600 (-$1795) Total: -$5199 Yeah ok. |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
I don't blame ya one bit, South Beach. He has to know 'the jig is up'. When his fictional bets DO hit, there's nary a morsel of congratulatory posts, where-as if you or gamlin/casp would connect on similar play that would result in a FRACTION of his payoffs, this board would LIGHT UP with posts about how great the hit was. Anybody with a shred of a brain knows this to be true. I used to be combative by nature, product of growing up with a sharp older brother that would always put us to the test, but as the years have went bye I've been able to put away my 'rabbit ears' and let stuff just roll right off of me. This, however, grinds my gears to no end. I truly believe it stems from the fact that we ALL know he's a sharp guy and has one of the better opinions on the board, but when he tries to pull the wool over our eyes in the selection room, it just steams me up. I hope whatever is the root of this problem gets rectified. Hell, I hope that I'm proven wrong and IM the one that's made out to look like the idiot, but every morsel of my functioning brain tells me we're being duped.
Best of luck in all your wagers South Beach, and I hope you decide to start posting your plays here again bc you wager on different tracks than I do (the Arlingtons of the world) and I usually liked to either piggy-back some of your plays and/or would watch those races with a rooting interest. Hope to see you start back up!
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
I disagree . I personally do not think he is a sharp guy. I don't think his opinion is very good. Other than Arrogate, he really hasn't won much. When he was doing that contest with the other fake betting fraud, it was autofade city and I had a nice little run, because they both stunk. I don't know why you guys think his opinion is any good with the ridiculousness of his play. Realistically, who spends 4 or 5 hundred in the pick 4 or 5 and have the 2 faves in th first end? What could it possibly pay ? He'll get alive in some 2 by 2 double play and then be rolling out the pick threes off the hoss' he's alive with for a score. I don't know about you guys, but if I have a $20 double going that's paying a cnote, I'll be happy enough winning the gnote without betting $300 more off of him too. Why the crazy bets is the mystery. Who is he trying to impress?
Last edited by Alabama Stakes : 07-03-2017 at 10:46 PM. |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |