Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:05 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default State by State

270 electoral votes needed to win it.

These 4 states are close: CO(9) OH(20) VA(13) NV(5)



I'll call the other 46 (because I can easily handle such a task.)



Pro-Obama States (TOTAL: 264 electoral votes)

PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM
CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT...don't forget D.C.(3 ELEC. VOTES....BELIEVE IT OR NOT.)


Pro-McCain States (total:227 electoral votes...of course...the predominant thing in common is most of the states that had slavery ain't having OBAMA.)

AL AZ AR FL SD AK
GA NC ND ID IN KS MO
KY LA MS MT NE OK
SC TN UT WV WY TX



NH,AND NM could be soft,but I think Obama will take them. Florida could be soft, but I expect it's McCain's. If Florida or Ohio go for Obama, then JohnnyCat, you are dead. Funny how 2 states that are normally battleground states(Missouri,and Arkansas) aren't even close when a brotha is involved.

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 09-05-2008 at 09:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:15 PM
Rileyoriley's Avatar
Rileyoriley Rileyoriley is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Snowy Woods
Posts: 4,484
Default

Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state.
Then again, I don't have much faith in polls.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:28 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

that's probably a good snapshot if the vote was held today.

but it could change in 2 months. obama has a ground war where he just needs to grind it out and hope the economy and unpopular war carry him. but he can't make any mistakes.

i think the republican's nominated the only candidate they had that wouldn't get swamped. he's a moderate who has significant policy differences with the disastrously incompetent leadership in the white house.

it could still be a close republican win. but it could also be a close democratic win or a significant one. absent another terrorist attack there's no chance for a sweeping republican win.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:31 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rileyoriley
Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state.
Then again, I don't have much faith in polls.
Keep dreaming on this one. I'm being objective. I have given Johnboy everything he has been close to taking. Like I said, NH, and possibly NM could slip away from Obama, but I think all the others I listed are gunna stay his. Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin etc...all gunna stay with him. Johnny n' Ranger Gal could take all 4 of the close ones I mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:34 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rileyoriley
Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state.
Then again, I don't have much faith in polls.
where are you getting those numbers? i haven't seen any poll that has mccain that close. the idea mccain would be competitive in mass is off the rails.

mccain won't spend any more effort campaigning there than obama will in alaska. and for the same reason.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:40 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
that's probably a good snapshot if the vote was held today.

but it could change in 2 months. obama has a ground war where he just needs to grind it out and hope the economy and unpopular war carry him. but he can't make any mistakes.

i think the republican's nominated the only candidate they had that wouldn't get swamped. he's a moderate who has significant policy differences with the disastrously incompetent leadership in the white house.

it could still be a close republican win. but it could also be a close democratic win or a significant one. absent another terrorist attack there's no chance for a sweeping republican win.
No, it's not drastic( he agreed with Geedubbya 90% of the time.) Fact is there aren't that many states in play. The Electoral College is not that hard to figure out. States vote about the same way each time they vote for Pres. There are states in play, but not as many as people think. Seriously, maybe these 11 are even close. FL ND NC MI NH MN CO OH NV VA NM
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:49 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
No, it's not drastic( he agreed with Geedubbya 90% of the time.) Fact is there aren't that many states in play. The Electoral College is not that hard to figure out. States vote about the same way each time they vote for Pres. There are states in play, but not as many as people think. Seriously, maybe these 11 are even close. FL ND NC MI NH MN CO OH NV VA NM
Wisconsin will be tougher than it looks
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:51 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

McCain will win comfortably. i said it as soon as he won New Hampshire, and nothing has changed. in fact, the situation vastly improved for him this week.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:53 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
No, it's not drastic( he agreed with Geedubbya 90% of the time.) Fact is there aren't that many states in play. The Electoral College is not that hard to figure out. States vote about the same way each time they vote for Pres. There are states in play, but not as many as people think.
you mean like, massachusetts?

i know the partisans have to paint everything in black and white and i understand the dems have to make this about another bush term.

but there's a reason mccain has been held at arms length by his own party for so long. he really has taken principled position's that have cost him politically.

he's likely the best candidate for president i will ever vote against.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:54 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
McCain will win comfortably. i said it as soon as he won New Hampshire, and nothing has changed. in fact, the situation vastly improved for him this week.

^
afterglow.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:28 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rileyoriley
Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state.
Then again, I don't have much faith in polls.
Really, as a proud graduate of public high school in Salem Mass., the State University in Amherst and a life long Red Sox fan who grew up with but a few absolutes of life in Massachusetts........we have Democrats and Catholics in Boston and the surrounding Rte 128 area......JFK was both and although close to 50 years ago, I would be shocked if this Obama guy did not receive the electoral backing of the Commonwealth the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:29 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
Wisconsin will be tougher than it looks
Keary carried it. He is up by about 4%, and I doubt that goes all the way away, and he is probably even more popular in Madison than is showing up in polling. I think he has a solid 264 with
PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM
CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT District of Columbia, but there certainly is no other state that he can rely on. My guess is he loses Nevada, Colorado, and Ohio, and barely gets home by winning Virginia. For some reason, Virginia is pretty consistently polling for him by a sliver. It's going to be a very close election. He needs one more state, and he is gunna have to work very hard to get it. I think he gave up on Florida, and went for a V.P. that would help solidify Michigan, and give him an outside shot of winning Ohio.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:34 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Keary carried it. He is up by about 4%, and I doubt that goes all the way away, and he is probably even more popular in Madison than is showing up in polling. I think he has a solid 264 with
PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM
CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT District of Columbia, but there certainly is no other state that he can rely on. My guess is he loses Nevada, Colorado, and Ohio, and barely gets home by winning Virginia. For some reason, Virginia is pretty consistently polling for him by a sliver. It's going to be a very close election. He needs one more state, and he is gunna have to work very hard to get it. I think he gave up on Florida, and went for a V.P. that would help solidify Michigan, and give him an outside shot of winning Ohio.

not a chance in hell he carries VA.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:53 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
not a chance in hell he carries VA.

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/virginia.html

Poll after poll shows that state is virgin tight. Don't you have a Democrat running away with the senate race? This is the one state where the "Black vote" could make a difference, because it is (for sure) very close.

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 09-06-2008 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-06-2008, 12:05 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/virginia.html

Poll after poll shows that state is virgin tight.
http://news.aol.com/elections/story/...05233409990018
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-06-2008, 12:51 AM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
not a chance in hell he carries VA.
Still disagree with you there.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-06-2008, 12:58 AM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
not a chance in hell he carries VA.
kev-

you can keep posting that but poll after poll shows it's a toss up. i haven't seen anything the last 3 months that had either ahead by more than the margin of error.

watch how many trips mccain and palin make to va the next 2 months and then tell me there's no chance.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-06-2008, 01:04 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Biden was in Manassas on wednesday.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-06-2008, 01:07 AM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default

with Palin as McCain's running mate, no way does he carry OH. Obama will carry downtown Cleveland, Columbus and maybe Cincy (unions and black vote)... no way does he carry any rural county. He'll lose the veteran (which Ohio has a ton of) and male vote by a wide margin and with a pro-life woman on the ticket, will lose the women vote too.

If they chose Hillary, Obama could have won it (the rural women would vote for Hillary over Obama... as they did in the primary or over McCain), but will now almost all vote for McCain since there's a pro-life woman on the ticket. They would have looked past the pro-life part for Hillary, but with them not taking her, the democrats will lose the state... probably by a wider margin than most will expect too.

Grew up there and know the area and the way the people will vote.

I will say one thing for Obama though... he's better off in Ohio by himself, because the type of person that Biden is... is exactly what they cannot stand.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-06-2008, 01:14 AM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwkniska
with Palin as McCain's running mate, no way does he carry OH. Obama will carry downtown Cleveland, Columbus and maybe Cincy (unions and black vote)... no way does he carry any rural county. He'll lose the veteran (which Ohio has a ton of) and male vote by a wide margin and with a pro-life woman on the ticket, will lose the women vote too.

If they chose Hillary, Obama could have won it (the rural women would vote for Hillary over Obama... as they did in the primary or over McCain), but will now almost all vote for McCain since there's a pro-life woman on the ticket. They would have looked past the pro-life part for Hillary, but with them not taking her, the democrats will lose the state... probably by a wider margin than most will expect too.

Grew up there and know the area and the way the people will vote.

I will say one thing for Obama though... he's better off in Ohio by himself, because the type of person that Biden is... is exactly what they cannot stand.
so like i said to kev...

if there's no way mccain wins ohio, why are the dems campaigning so hard there?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.