|
|
 |
|
#22
07-05-2011, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#23
07-05-2011, 05:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
|
|
#25
07-05-2011, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The funny thing is everything you project on me, is what makes you the douche that you are. Your opinion doesn't matter. You see yourself as the arbiter of what is right and wrong. You can't wait to hop on here and tell people how they should think, how they should react. No one cares about your lectures or your world views. Like I said to you before....go back into your cave you creep.
|
|
#26
07-05-2011, 06:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think this jury undestood the meaning of "reasonable doibt."
It would be hard to convict someone on a couple of examples of circumstantial evidence. But, in this case, they could throw out a 100 of the examples and still not be left with reasonable doubt. I would submit that this jury was too tired and worn out serving on that sequestered jury for 6 weeks to spend the time to fully examine the evidence. They just wanted to put an end to it and took the quick and easy way out. The distaff version of OJ. What a tragedy.
__________________
I l  Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am "Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
|
|
#27
07-05-2011, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree princess. unless you have 100 witnesses who all say the same thing, there will always be some 'reasonable' doubt.
its too bad that it ended like that. i am amazed. honest people with nothing whatsoever to hide don't make up a string of lies a mile long. people have been convicted of murder without a body! this girl gets away with it, and they had the body. unbelievable.
|
|
#30
07-05-2011, 09:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wish PackerBacker would invite BuffyFrost over to his trailer and a daisycutter just so happens to precisely fall into their arms as they hug each other.
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel
|
|
#31
07-06-2011, 08:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Basically, the jury rejected the circumstencial evidence, even though it overwhelmed them to a point where I couldnt see them letting her off. the jury was filled with by the book morons.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#32
07-06-2011, 10:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I confess, I didn't know anything about the trial until about two weeks ago, and then didn't follow it because the subject matter upset me too much, but the verdict doesn't mean she didn't do it; it means the prosecution didn't make their case. Cases built on circumstantial evidence, which this was, from what I gather, are very, very hard to prove, and it sounds like the prosecution, in their rush to bring this to trial, did a sh*tty job of it.
The onus of guilt must always be on the state to prove, not on the defendant to disprove. We give that up, in our rush to have a perpetrator to blame, then we might as well give up any notion that we believe in a free society. And we can never underestimate the power of the media to shape the narrative we see, and clearly the media wanted the narrative to be that this woman did it. Again, I'm not saying she didn't; I didn't follow the case. But, and be honest with yourself, how many of us were absolutely sure that Gary Condit was involved in Chandra Levy's disappearance? Because that was the narrative the media wanted, and that's what they put forth, to the exclusion of any other possibilities.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
|
|
#33
07-06-2011, 10:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
see, i don't see it as being like gary condit. he was a slimeball, but there was nothing tying him to her crime. no smelly car, no string of lies, etc.
now, the atlanta bombing and richard jewell...that was definitely a media frenzy, as was the duke rape case.
|
|
#34
07-06-2011, 11:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
it was a lot like the Peterson california murder case though.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#35
07-06-2011, 01:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
A California jury convicting Scott Peterson was making up for what the OJ jury did. The Casey Anthony jury had far more CE than the Scott Peterson jury had.
Casey is saying that the first thing she wants to do when she gets out of prison is have another baby. I guess she wants to sucker her parents into supporting and taking care of another kid. This gal is a sociopath - she'll not be able to overcome it, and she'll be even more vulnerable to trouble now because the predators will swoop down on her like a plague. Kharma will catch up with her... I'm hoping.
__________________
I l Cigar, Medaglia d'Oro, Big Brown, Curlin, Rachel Alexandra, Silver Charm, First Samurai, Sumwonlovesyou, Lloydobler, Ausable Chasm, AND Prince Will I Am "Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton
|
|
#36
07-06-2011, 01:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Linear Mode
