Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Triple Crown Topics/Archive..
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:14 PM
mclem10011 mclem10011 is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 714
Default Perhaps i phrased it wrong......

But I never cared for Flashy Bull, yet i thought he stepped up on Preakness day and ran a nice race. Perhaps Steppenwolfer could do likewise.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:16 PM
golfer's Avatar
golfer golfer is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
see...you got me there Seth. My simple ass has ZERO clue of how to read those TG sheets.
Kev, at the end of many a day, I am left to conclude that neither do I
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:20 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mclem10011
But I never cared for Flashy Bull, yet i thought he stepped up on Preakness day and ran a nice race. Perhaps Steppenwolfer could do likewise.


I don't understand what one could possibly have to do with the other.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:26 PM
Mortimer's Avatar
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
Thistley Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 21,864
Default

rule-eng en leff-eng!!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:28 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mortimerdexterfoxworthy
rule-eng en leff-eng!!

I wanted to make sure you noticed this one.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan07
Is there anyone who has DRF or Trackmaster or Equibase pp's for BEL SAT card
al_gobbi@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:30 PM
mclem10011 mclem10011 is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 714
Default Nothing technical......

I suppose, just a random thought. Geez, i take it back lol
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:39 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mclem10011
I suppose, just a random thought. Geez, i take it back lol
no no no, never take it back!!
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:42 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Am I the only one who thinks Bordonaro is a horrible favorite in the True North? It's not like the horse has necessarily welcomed a challenge, and I expect Keyed Entry will put pressure on him from the beginning.

Both of Dutrow's entries look like they have a shot to be competitive.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:44 PM
mclem10011 mclem10011 is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 714
Default Your right!

I don't! I have just as much right as anyone on here, to make random comments, no matter how stupid they may be.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:13 PM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Am I the only one who thinks Bordonaro is a horrible favorite in the True North? It's not like the horse has necessarily welcomed a challenge, and I expect Keyed Entry will put pressure on him from the beginning.

Both of Dutrow's entries look like they have a shot to be competitive.
Is Keyed Entry fast enough to go with Bordonaro? That is the question. If the pace does kill the front runners, I look to Suave Jazz or Will He Shine to pick up the pieces - Joey P has fallen on his face when he previously tried graded company.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:19 PM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
ok Seth...my comment??


COSMONAUT????
Horse has never been better since Prado got on board, should have won the Dixie, and has won at 10f on turf. If English Channel needs one after his trip, Cosmonaut can take advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:24 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann
Horse has never been better since Prado got on board, should have won the Dixie, and has won at 10f on turf. If English Channel needs one after his trip, Cosmonaut can take advantage.

Again...I would think BTN or SQ would be more likely than Cosmonaut if EC fails to fire.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:28 PM
ninetoone's Avatar
ninetoone ninetoone is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 2,278
Default

BTN runs by them all to win by a half length...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:30 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninetoone
BTN runs by them all to win 2nd place by a half length...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:36 PM
ninetoone's Avatar
ninetoone ninetoone is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 2,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
disclaimer: I was the guy that bet on BTN in the BC Turf in '04, and therefore have zero objectivity when this horse runs. Still wish I had let that $ ride on The Zapper in the Classic...unfortunately I had another fierce loyalty to Pleasantly Perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-07-2007, 10:54 PM
skippy3481 skippy3481 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,289
Default

Alan,
Come on man, buy them for your self. What's it like 1.50 now? Seriously if you are too cheap to buy your own program why are you betting? Don't mean to be a dick, but if your going to beg something at least let it be thoro's
__________________
Inveniemus viam aut faciemus
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-07-2007, 11:48 PM
AngelSita's Avatar
AngelSita AngelSita is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mindoro, WI
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninetoone
disclaimer: I was the guy that bet on BTN in the BC Turf in '04, and therefore have zero objectivity when this horse runs. Still wish I had let that $ ride on The Zapper in the Classic...unfortunately I had another fierce loyalty to Pleasantly Perfect.
I had money on BTN that race as well. I've been a fan of his ever since.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-08-2007, 08:19 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

I don't know how I will resist my urge to play longshot Minister's Joy in the Manhatten.

He's been on my watch list ever since he lost a little allowance race on the turf at Calder a few years---it wasn't the toughest of fields even for that level at Calder---but I thought he was off the charts in defeat, for that class level.

I've always thought you might see the best from him in fast paced, 10 furlong turf race---and I expect him to trip out, and hopefully he's good enough to win or run 2nd. I've certainly chased him in spots he didn't fit as well in from a race-shape standpoint.

The two name horses in this race have some questions they need to address...and the two other good ones might be overbet...

* English Channel flopped in Dubai last out.

* Sky Conqueror is legit--and will be tough--but he's never run outside of Toronto or Kentucky...and the time to get the value on him was probably last out.

* Better Talk Now didn't pass his rabbit until a few jumps before the wire last time out.

* Like with SC, Cosmonaut is legit, and should factor into the outcome, but he might not offer as much value as you'd like to get.

I know my case for MJ might be pretty flimsy, and I look like I'm just reaching for a longshot---and I'll admit that the horse has been on my radar for a real long time---but I think he's one of a just a few horses, in the stakes, on the Belmont undercard---whom I believe really has a decent longshot look.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:03 AM
DerbyCat's Avatar
DerbyCat DerbyCat is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I don't know how I will resist my urge to play longshot Minister's Joy in the Manhatten.
....

I know my case for MJ might be pretty flimsy, and I look like I'm just reaching for a longshot---and I'll admit that the horse has been on my radar for a real long time---but I think he's one of a just a few horses, in the stakes, on the Belmont undercard---whom I believe really has a decent longshot look.

I'll be playing MJ, too. One of the first things I learned on this board was that Shug/Phipps horses are well placed when it comes to stakes and graded races - they don't enter unless they believe they can do well. Shugs got 4 horses in on Saturday and I'm betting at least one will win - hopefully it's MJ at a nice price (but I'll be playing the other 3 as well )
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
- Friedrich Nietzsche on Handicapping
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:08 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I don't know how I will resist my urge to play longshot Minister's Joy in the Manhatten.

He's been on my watch list ever since he lost a little allowance race on the turf at Calder a few years---it wasn't the toughest of fields even for that level at Calder---but I thought he was off the charts in defeat, for that class level.

I've always thought you might see the best from him in fast paced, 10 furlong turf race---and I expect him to trip out, and hopefully he's good enough to win or run 2nd. I've certainly chased him in spots he didn't fit as well in from a race-shape standpoint.

The two name horses in this race have some questions they need to address...and the two other good ones might be overbet...

* English Channel flopped in Dubai last out.

* Sky Conqueror is legit--and will be tough--but he's never run outside of Toronto or Kentucky...and the time to get the value on him was probably last out.

* Better Talk Now didn't pass his rabbit until a few jumps before the wire last time out.

* Like with SC, Cosmonaut is legit, and should factor into the outcome, but he might not offer as much value as you'd like to get.

I know my case for MJ might be pretty flimsy, and I look like I'm just reaching for a longshot---and I'll admit that the horse has been on my radar for a real long time---but I think he's one of a just a few horses, in the stakes, on the Belmont undercard---whom I believe really has a decent longshot look.
Minister's Joy was certainly compromised in his allowance race at Belmont,- they went a ridiculous 1:14 4/5 for the 6F on basically rock hard turf, before coming home in :34 flat. He certainly has an explosive late kick but given the lack of any real pace in here (Red Zipper?? are you serious?) I think he might be up against it again to deliver his maximum performance.

I agree with your analysis of the contenders, particularly English Channel. As much of a fan I am of him, the first-off-Dubai is a very large obstacle.

I have a suspicion Cosmonaut will be way overbet based on the trouble in the Dixie, however he hasn't performed his best going more than a mile and an eighth.

If I take a shot in here it'll be on Shakis, who overcame that ridiculous pace in the aforementioned Minister's Joy race with the guess that Lasix was the difference in his performance from Dubai. He should get first jump and if the closers sit too far back, he should be able to hold them off.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.