#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
war emblem either won, or was out of the money completely. it was like he knew if he couldn't win, he wanted to take his toys and go home. then his post-race career has been nothing but a mess. it was funny, i had volponi in the espn pick six contest. only race i missed was the turf mile that year. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Your exactly right. I couldn't believe how overrated he was. But after Giacomo, a new standard for incompetence was set. Now if we went back 25 years to 1982, Gato Del Sol might've been the worst of all. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Giacomo did race on the west coast mostly back before the synthetic came in, so I would agree he was always racing against the bias. He might have had more success as an east coast based horse.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
His loss in the Goodwood was over a track where speed couldn't lose...and Lava Man and Brother Derek both loafed and didn't pressure each other. Yet he was carving into their lead late.
It was a true strong biased track - there were occasionaly times when closers did very well on Santa Anita's dirt...that day certainly wasn't one of them. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Any votes for FUSAICHI OVERRATED,CHARISMATIC or MONARCHOS?
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Overrated as he was - Fusaichi Pegasus would have also murdered Sea Hero and Giacomo.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
to me there can be only 3 possibilities. sea hero, charismatic and the legendary gato del sal (as i like to call giacamo).
the sea hero derby wins it for me as that's the only derby (since i got involved in racing) that i ever refused to watch. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
If his other accomplishments don't matter, than surely his other losses don't matter either. Its rather apparent from his record that Sea Hero was the type of horse that had to run to find his best form, something that was exploited masterfully by Mack Miller, given that aside from a maiden win (which took several starts) and an allowance tune-up at 4, his only other victories came in the important Champagne, Derby, and Travers. If you want to dock him for losing blatant prep races like the Bluegrass and Jim Dandy, then that just underlines one of racing's major problems nowadays: that trainers (and fans) somehow have come to expect that top horses have to win every start.
Not that his best efforts were necessarily killer, but Sea Hero won races when it most mattered, and the fact that he was able to produce top form and win 3 of his 6 most important tests (Champagne, BC Juvenile, Derby, Preakness, Belmont, Travers) by open lengths has to have come from something more than just mere coincidence. Certainly, these focused performances amid a bevy of failures in lesser races has to be superior to the consistent mediocrity that Giacomo displayed in his career. But regardless, simply put, Sea Hero, speedfigure-wise, ran faster than Giacomo in their respective Derbies (105 BSF vs. 100 BSF). And just for a little more pull in his favor, Sea Hero, in his best performance, won the '93 Travers over a deep field: Kissin Kris- Belmont runner up, recent Haskell winner who later was 3rd in that year's BC Classic Miner's Mark- Jim Dandy winner and subsequent winner of the Jockey Club Gold Cup Cherokee Run- Preakness runner up, subsequent BC Sprint winner and champion Devoted Brass- Swaps winner, later a winner in Saudi Arabia Virginia Rapids- Peter Pan winner, subsequent Carter winner Colonial Affair- Belmont winner, subsequent JCGC and Whitney winner Giacomo, in his only subsequent win defeated Preachinatthebar and Papi Chullo. Oh...and Rathor. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone who wants to take a look at the pp's for Sea Hero can here.
http://www.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/...rbywinners.pdf Keep in mind - his crop of 3yo's was brutally bad. Prarie Bayou had a much tougher trip than him and was clearly the better horse in the Derby. Prarie Bayou, in fact, came back to win the Preakness with a 98 Beyer (by open lengths - or 8 points the slowest Preakness ever) Giacomo ran the same figure as PB did when he was a distant 3rd in the Preakness. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Here's Giacomo's pps: http://www.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/...erbywinner.pdf Based on this, Giacomo was slower than Sea Hero by at least 5 BSF points at both 2 and 3. But he got the upper hand at 4th, with a mighty 3rd in the Goodwood (curious that Giacomo is lauded for somewhat overcoming a bias--remember he didn't win--yet is not downgraded for his perfect setup in the Derby) and a scorching 4th in the BC Classic. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
They look a lot alike on form.
As you say - Sea Hero's numbers were a little better at 2 and 3 - while the lighter raced Giacomo had better numbers at age 4 - with his last two races of his career both very solid races. Giacomo got a setup in the Derby - but he stumbled at the start and it's never easy for a plodder without much turn of foot to weave through that big field. Still, circumstancial win, no doubt. Sea Hero's ride by Jerry Bailey in the Derby is a coin flip with Kent D's ride on Fu Peg for 2nd best ride I've seen in the Derby. SH had a dream trip. I'd have liked to have seen what Sea Hero's trip in the '93 Derby would have looked like if the current version of Mike Smith was riding him. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Volponi's big race in the BC Classic came with a blinkers change though. |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There was a story I've heard before about Whirlaway getting run down on the lead in the one mile Derby Trial as a 3/5 favorite a few days before the '41 Derby. Supposedly, Ben Jones took a knife and cut away one of his blinkers in the paddock on Derby day - he won the race by 8 lengths in record time....and his win in the Preakness next out featured one of the most amazing last-to-first wins in a major stake - along with perhaps Damascus's '67 Travers. I guess that qualifies as a blinker change if the stories are true. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|