LOL-ain't over

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

WOW!! What an f'd up system the Texas Democratic Party has going on.Are you kid'n me? 1/3 of the delegates are given out in the caucus(which looks like a disaster.)The other 2/3 of the delegates are given out by voting in private.Hillary won that by about 100 thousand votes.Now wait,they don't give out delegates by the amount of votes statewide.They give out delegates by the district,and Democratic stronghold areas are given more delegates than the more rural Republican dominated districts.How about we just count up peoples votes.Same as in the National Election in November.Forget the damn state your in.Just add up each Americans vote.Period.For a country that claims be to "fair" and just.We just aren't.If your a Democrat living out in the Texas countryside,evidently your vote in the primary doesn't count as much in the primary as some Democrat from an inner city Dallas district.Then,that same Democrat out in the Texas Countryside really doesn't have any reason to vote in November,because this is a red state.Someday,this crap has to be looked at.Just because you're a voting minority in a state,shouldn't make your vote useless in a presidential election.This is the case for Democrats in Texas,and Republicans in New York etc.

the electoral college was put in place so that smaller, less populated states would have as much say in the election as the larger states. i don't see that system going away any time soon.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

The status quo only works if McCain is elected...I've a clear choice...a 71 year old white guy who is basically a Bush clone or someone who just might bring about significant change for the better. This election is appearing to be more and more about the economy...and that's a dog that don't hunt for McCain!

You obviously dont know much about McCain if you believe that he is a Bush clone and McCains positions on the economy are not much different than Sir Hillary's. I am not commenting on McCain's abilities but he is not that similar to Bush except he is a white guy (which is a bad thing for many lefties)

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by GBBob

Potential Cannon running mate

He is more of a director of the CIA type

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by GBBob

It is too early in the process to discuss running mates, but I can share with you that she probably won't pass our initial back ground checks. I eagerly await your list of potentials from the deep talent pool that you have to choose from.

You mean your running mate has to be sober more than 15 minutes a day?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You obviously dont know much about McCain if you believe that he is a Bush clone and McCains positions on the economy are not much different than Sir Hillary's. I am not commenting on McCain's abilities but he is not that similar to Bush except he is a white guy (which is a bad thing for many lefties)

i don't see how he can be compared to bush, or called a bush clone.

but i also don't see where hillary has all this 'experience' all of a sudden. from where? being first lady of arkansas? first lady of the u.s.? the one thing bill gave her to run with, health care, blew up in her face. her not even two terms as a ny senator? i'd say her time spent in public office is comparable to obamas. and it cracks me up to know that bill said obama is too young, too experienced--sounded almost like what was said about him when he ran!

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i don't see how he can be compared to bush, or called a bush clone.

but i also don't see where hillary has all this 'experience' all of a sudden. from where? being first lady of arkansas? first lady of the u.s.? the one thing bill gave her to run with, health care, blew up in her face. her not even two terms as a ny senator? i'd say her time spent in public office is comparable to obamas. and it cracks me up to know that bill said obama is too young, too experienced--sounded almost like what was said about him when he ran!

When running for office truth is often a matter of opinion.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I'll be announcing my candidacy to run against Cannon shortly as the Dem representative for DT president

I like the sound of this...

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You obviously dont know much about McCain if you believe that he is a Bush clone and McCains positions on the economy are not much different than Sir Hillary's. I am not commenting on McCain's abilities but he is not that similar to Bush except he is a white guy (which is a bad thing for many lefties)

McCain n' Bush are both Republican white guys that performed poorly in college tests and/or military tests.Both were aided by influential fathers/grandfathers etc.That's about it.McCain is not nearly the a-hole
that GEEDUMBO is.The Conservatives don't have a candidate...F them.

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

WOW!! What an f'd up system the Texas Democratic Party has going on.Are you kid'n me? 1/3 of the delegates are given out in the caucus(which looks like a disaster.)The other 2/3 of the delegates are given out by voting in private.Hillary won that by about 100 thousand votes.Now wait,they don't give out delegates by the amount of votes statewide.They give out delegates by the district,and Democratic stronghold areas are given more delegates than the more rural Republican dominated districts.How about we just count up peoples votes.Same as in the National Election in November.Forget the damn state your in.Just add up each Americans vote.Period.For a country that claims be to "fair" and just.We just aren't.If your a Democrat living out in the Texas countryside,evidently your vote in the primary doesn't count as much in the primary as some Democrat from an inner city Dallas district.Then,that same Democrat out in the Texas Countryside really doesn't have any reason to vote in November,because this is a red state.Someday,this crap has to be looked at.Just because you're a voting minority in a state,shouldn't make your vote useless in a presidential election.This is the case for Democrats in Texas,and Republicans in New York etc.

Scuds.
I think ultimatley you are good fella.

But jeez you are right and then so totally wrong on so may levels
about a state you know very little about.

I am very long winded (naugghhh), so I will just take on
one section; the bolded one. Then if you want more, if you
really want to know more about how it works here...
I could continue. Although the rest of the board might
want to throw up as I have many fans.

The bolded section favors democrats big time. BIG TIME.
And you are right about it being unfair.

Scuds one other thing to think about.

Rush Limbothersome let Bill Clinton on his
show and basically let him talk without
any real sort of challenge... Why?

I might add Clinton has not lost a step.
He was very, very good.

Good man for bring all this up as it is
interesting. Clinton is still on the ropes
and about to go, and Texas Republicans
HELPED.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

How can you write so much and say practically nothing? F'N AMAZING

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

How can you write so much and say practically nothing? F'N AMAZING

Ok.
Your so damn wrong its fckn amazing.

Better?

If you dont understand Texas.
I understand why.

Rep. want to run against whom in Nov.?

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by pgardn

If you dont understand Texas.
I understand why.

Rep. want to run against whom in Nov.?

Hill

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Hill

good time to back out...

At least you dont hang around
trying to weasel your way out.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

No,it's not the center(if it was,then you wouldn't have this guy as your Republican Presidential Candidate.)Even if you think Republicans voted for him because they were scared of losing with a Conservative.They still were doing that as a result of their views being right of the country's center.The country's center is somewhere between Lieberman and McCain.The more he gets like Lieberman,the more chance he has.Conservatives will vote against Hillary,or Obama(if it's a close state.)McCain should ignore them.Do what he did last week to the Cincy ass-hole.

ok, I'll go along with that. I wouldn't want anyone to confuse him with any limited gubment, liberty minded conservatives.

I know that everyone says we have to dumb it down so the idiot swing voters will go along.

not too many people may know this but it appears that Obama has the same criminal connections that the gov. of il Rod Blogo has. I doubt it would happen but he may have to appear in court.

of the last 4 governors - only former gov. Jim Edgar has managed to stay out of jail.
btw
Jim Edgar is a horse enthusiast. The family are owners.

[pdrift1]

is there any correlation to repbulicans -bruno with nyra , fletcher with slots in 2 of the most important states for racing?

[pdrift1]

hell add in the fed gov, more rep then dem agreeing to ban online gambling

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

ok, I'll go along with that. I wouldn't want anyone to confuse him with any limited gubment, liberty minded conservatives.

I know that everyone says we have to dumb it down so the idiot swing voters will go along.

not too many people may know this but it appears that Obama has the same criminal connections that the gov. of il Rod Blogo has. I doubt it would happen but he may have to appear in court.
of the last 4 governors - only former gov. Jim Edgar has managed to stay out of jail.
btw
Jim Edgar is a horse enthusiast. The family are owners.

I'm not sure how you can say that since it has been in the papers the last 6 months and on TV the last week.
Blago is Figure A and is in deep trouble...and deserves every bit of it

Originally Posted by GBBob

I'm not sure how you can say that since it has been in the papers the last 6 months and on TV the last week.
Blago is Figure A and is in deep trouble...and deserves every bit of it

McCain was at a party with a murderer.
There were 1000 thousand other people at the party,
but McCain was present.