Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:13 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DogsUp
Anything at the Federal level will trump anything at the State level. If Congress wants to have a single body running racing, then I think they will be in over their head and move on. Now, I am all for states right. I guess you can call me a John C Calhoun person (minus th belief in slavery). I do not know if a single body would be better or not. All I know is that the Federal Gov't can tell the states to do whatever they want.
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:01 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.
While the current Supreme Court has been trying to rein in, pardon the pun, Congress's ability to legislate in certain areas (the case where the Court invalidated, on Commerce Clause grounds, the Congressional act prohibiting guns within so many feet of a school comes to mind immediately), I don't think there is any question that racing, in its modern form, constitutes interstate commerce.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:06 PM
ShadowRoll's Avatar
ShadowRoll ShadowRoll is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Caln Township, PA
Posts: 975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.
Does the term "shipper" ring a bell?
__________________
Ticket Seller: All kind of balls...
Bodyguard: One of his is crystal.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-27-2008, 06:48 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

the feds have their way of getting their way. highway money and drinking age for example.
but really, it would be a bit amusing on the states behalf to suddenly squawk states rights, since they willingly give up plenty so as not to hit their budget.

but i don't like congress being involved in congress, so i sure don't want them in horse racing.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.