Voters being illegally removed from rolls - Page 2

Danzig · #21 10-09-2008, 11:15 PM

did you read the article? it has to do with certain states not following the law about removing voters from rolls. didn't mention the # of voters, how they compare to the population as a whole. has a lot to do with people having moved, and not having all their paperwork completely up to date for one--so, the state sees something doesn't tally with the ss paperwork, and off you go. probably has a lot to do with people updating their SS stuff(so as not to affect getting their federal tax return for example, as we all know you must give a proper physical address) while remaining in their home state, and their drivers license shows their old addy. after all, who updates their DL when they move in state? probably not many folks, i'd imagine they wait til the thing expires to avoid an extra fee.
the article doesn't discuss possible improper registration, but illegal removal of voters. BIG difference.

hi_im_god · #22 10-09-2008, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion!

dead. brain dead. what's the real difference?

it's pretty elitist to think a dead person can't vote but a junior high drop out can.

and i hate the idea that american muslims might participate in mainstream politics. we're much better off keeping them marginalized.

i wonder if some smart republican will ever figure out that a culture built around the family might be their natural constituency if you stopped dumbfu<k yahoo's from driving them the other direction.

Danzig · #23 10-09-2008, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

dead. brain dead. what's the real difference?

it's pretty elitist to think a dead person can't vote but a junior high drop out can.

and i hate the idea that american muslims might participate in mainstream politics. we're much better off keeping them marginalized.

i wonder if some smart republican will ever figure out that a culture built around the family might be their natural constituency if you stopped dumbfu<k yahoo's from driving them the other direction.

i missed his 'dems driving folks to mosques' line the first time i read his post...yikes.

i don't know what to say. what, folks who worship in mosques have lost their right to register? i didn't know that.
but you know...had the founding fathers realized just how much trouble we'd have from muslim americans, no doubt there'd be something in the constitution about everyone but them having religious freedom. no doubt about it.

timmgirvan · #24 10-09-2008, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

i missed his 'dems driving folks to mosques' line the first time i read his post...yikes.

i don't know what to say. what, folks who worship in mosques have lost their right to register? i didn't know that.
but you know...had the founding fathers realized just how much trouble we'd have from muslim americans, no doubt there'd be something in the constitution about everyone but them having religious freedom. no doubt about it.

The actions are right in front of your noses in print and online! You know damn well what I meant,too

SniperSB23 · #25 10-10-2008, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ents-to-acorn/

you can't tell me that you approve of these thing.

Who cares how many times someone registers? It is how many times they vote that is the issue. If registering 15 times allows them to vote 15 times then it is a major issue. If they can still only vote once then who the hell cares?

timmgirvan · #26 10-10-2008, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Who cares how many times someone registers? It is how many times they vote that is the issue. If registering 15 times allows them to vote 15 times then it is a major issue. If they can still only vote once then who the hell cares?

Of course it's a big issue......why would they register that many times if they weren't planning to abuse the system? Like I tried to point out, there major investigations in 10 states now about this abuse.

Antitrust32 · #27 10-10-2008, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Of course it's a big issue......why would they register that many times if they weren't planning to abuse the system? Like I tried to point out, there major investigations in 10 states now about this abuse.

you mean ACORN, which has registered more imaginary people than alive people it seems. VERY scary group that Obama used to be involved in directly and his campaign has given ACORN $800,000.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...4%7D&dist=hppr

dalakhani · #28 10-10-2008, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

you mean ACORN, which has registered more imaginary people than alive people it seems. VERY scary group that Obama used to be involved in directly and his campaign has given ACORN $800,000.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...4%7D&dist=hppr

What do you know about acorn besides what you just read in that article? I want to hear this.

Make it quick...no google.

SniperSB23 · #29 10-10-2008, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

you mean ACORN, which has registered more imaginary people than alive people it seems. VERY scary group that Obama used to be involved in directly and his campaign has given ACORN $800,000.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...4%7D&dist=hppr

The whole ACORN thing is just too fishy to be true. If you were going to commit voter fraud you sure as hell wouldn't register as Tony Romo or Terrell Owens. It seems so obvious that it seems more like people messing around to make ACORN look bad.

Antitrust32 · #30 10-10-2008, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani

What do you know about acorn besides what you just read in that article? I want to hear this.

Make it quick...no google.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...ims/index.html

And its from CNN

Who cares what I know about ACORN, the facts are out there now. Go ahead and explain away DALA.

Antitrust32 · #31 10-10-2008, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

The whole ACORN thing is just too fishy to be true. If you were going to commit voter fraud you sure as hell wouldn't register as Tony Romo or Terrell Owens. It seems so obvious that it seems more like people messing around to make ACORN look bad.

Its not like it just started happening though.

http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

dalakhani · #32 10-10-2008, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...ims/index.html

And its from CNN

Who cares what I know about ACORN, the facts are out there now. Go ahead and explain away DALA.

You are honest...and lipstick.

Im not getting into this one.

timmgirvan · #33 10-10-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

The whole ACORN thing is just too fishy to be true. If you were going to commit voter fraud you sure as hell wouldn't register as Tony Romo or Terrell Owens. It seems so obvious that it seems more like people messing around to make ACORN look bad.

You can't be that naive! why do candidates spend untold millions of dollars for a 300,000 per year job?

SniperSB23 · #34 10-10-2008, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

You can't be that naive! why do candidates spend untold millions of dollars for a 300,000 per year job?

Cause it is the most powerful position in the world. And what the hell does that have to do with ACORN?

timmgirvan · #35 10-10-2008, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Cause it is the most powerful position in the world. And what the hell does that have to do with ACORN?

Artificially inflating the voter rolls to influence the results! I really had to explain that?

Quiet Chris · #36 10-10-2008, 05:26 PM

I think everyone should be able to vote, but if you do not have some form of government ID you should NOT be allowed to vote. It really isn't that hard to come up with a drivers license or a picture ID. I think this is the most ridiculous thing going. All you have to do is walk up and say you are somebody and vote. Unreal.

Danzig · #37 10-10-2008, 05:49 PM

we show a license here when we vote, i thought everyone did.

Quiet Chris · #38 10-12-2008, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

we show a license here when we vote, i thought everyone did.

Nope. Ton of states where you don't need ID of any kind. KS is just one example. I am not a Republican either, but I have to agree with them that you should have to provide some ID. Who doesn't have ID and if you don't have ID why do you have the time to vote but not get a government issued ID?

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/ma...photo_id_vote/

They actually took this to court and the court said it is ok for a state to make a law stating ID is required, but states still don't have to do it.

MSNBC: The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.

In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana's strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to prevent fraud.