Obama's DOJ: Whites have no civil rights - Page 2

ateamstupid · #21 07-07-2010, 10:43 PM

Mort, if you're trying to pick a fight with me, disdain of Queen James ain't the subject to choose.

clyde · #22 07-07-2010, 10:46 PM

OK.

The Yankees could never make it if the ML was under NFL salary rules.

ateamstupid · #23 07-07-2010, 10:48 PM

I agree.

clyde · #24 07-07-2010, 10:50 PM

Phooey.

Well, who do you like?

ateamstupid · #25 07-07-2010, 10:51 PM

Uncly.

clyde · #26 07-07-2010, 10:57 PM

I hate you.

ateamstupid · #27 07-07-2010, 11:43 PM

I guess I have to find somewhere else to watch the charity telebron.

clyde · #28 07-08-2010, 12:04 AM

Just skip it...I don't follow anything about this nonsense.

LeMoi will probably appear on crutches and then spend the night dancing.

clyde · #29 07-08-2010, 12:04 AM

Oh..the TeleBron was a good one...fine work.

Rupert Pupkin · #30 07-08-2010, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notyep59

Is the Worldnetdaily any kin to the World News Daily?? After one read of each, I think I am smart enough never to read either again, and definitely not quote anything from them. If I need information on how to get accepted to Glen Beck's online university or need to hear more of how Pat Buchanan thinks Richard Steele is right, I"ll try to find Fox news on tv. What a joke!

You haven't come up with any sort of defense for Obama, Holder and the DOJ. You mentioned that World Net Daily is not a good source but that is irrelevant since the facts of this story are not in dispute.

I don't know how you can defend Holder on this one. If you like a DOJ that allows this type of behavior and only prosecutes certain races, then I don't know what to say.

I'm still not sure what your position is on this case. Are you saying that you approve of the way the Department of Justice handled this case?

joeydb · #31 07-08-2010, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

You haven't come up with any sort of defense for Obama, Holder and the DOJ. You mentioned that World Net Daily is not a good source but that is irrelevant since the facts of this story are not in dispute.

I don't know how you can defend Holder on this one. If you like a DOJ that allows this type of behavior and only prosecutes certain races, then I don't know what to say.

I'm still not sure what your position is on this case. Are you saying that you approve of the way the Department of Justice handled this case?

I love it when logic is used in a discussion -- it's very refreshing.

I've been waiting to see who's going to defend Holder on this, and the silence is deafening, as it should be, since there is no valid defense for this. The government is overtly acting in a racist manner. Period.

This even defies the invalid rules many proponents have put forward about discrimination, citing that civil rights are only violated when the responsible party "has power over you". This is to ensure a one-way enforcement like what we are now seeing. A white guy gets mugged at gunpoint in a black neighborhood, and somehow that's not a hate crime or a civil rights violation, but the reverse would be. This is the fantasy world of law enforcement they actively try to sustain. But now, since the president is half African American, he arguably "has power over" the disenfranchised caucasian litigants.

notyep59 · #32 07-08-2010, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

You haven't come up with any sort of defense for Obama, Holder and the DOJ. You mentioned that World Net Daily is not a good source but that is irrelevant since the facts of this story are not in dispute.

I don't know how you can defend Holder on this one. If you like a DOJ that allows this type of behavior and only prosecutes certain races, then I don't know what to say.

I'm still not sure what your position is on this case. Are you saying that you approve of the way the Department of Justice handled this case?

I'm not defending anyone in this case and I have NO idea of what the facts are. Should I pretend to, like some others here might?? All I know is that you folks are upset with some group that was appointed by the Bush administration, and evidently their views changed since we have a black president. That's my simple position on this case, and if I'm wrong I will suggest that they string Holder (whoever he is) up by his sack and charge admission. My biggest question from all of this is, how is this Obama's fault?

notyep59 · #33 07-08-2010, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

Thank you for expressing your opinion. I hope you enjoy the rest of the week. Im guessing your thinking O'Dumbass is doing a decent job as President? Besides that you should know by now I could care less what the people at this website think of me. I only have to keep two people happy: my wife and son. If anyone doesn't like it put me on the ignore list.

you should just copy and paste this as your response to everything, and hooray for your wife and son!!

Danzig · #34 07-08-2010, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notyep59

I'm not defending anyone in this case and I have NO idea of what the facts are. Should I pretend to, like some others here might?? All I know is that you folks are upset with some group that was appointed by the Bush administration, and evidently their views changed since we have a black president. That's my simple position on this case, and if I'm wrong I will suggest that they string Holder (whoever he is) up by his sack and charge admission. My biggest question from all of this is, how is this Obama's fault?

he's the attorney general of the united states.

notyep59 · #35 07-08-2010, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

he's the attorney general of the united states.

Thank you, Danzig. If I had to name an attorney general in the history of the U.S., I could only name two, Kennedy and Reno. You probably will never see me on "Jeopardy".

Danzig · #36 07-08-2010, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notyep59

Thank you, Danzig. If I had to name an attorney general in the history of the U.S., I could only name two, Kennedy and Reno. You probably will never see me on "Jeopardy".

lol
my kids keep trying to get me on there...i say no, knowing my luck the categories would be opera, ballet, broadway musicals....

my dad had an encounter way back when with eric holder, when he was an up and coming lawyer and my dad was a policeman in d.c. dad put the youngster in his place! lol

joeydb · #37 07-08-2010, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol
my kids keep trying to get me on there...i say no, knowing my luck the categories would be opera, ballet, broadway musicals....

my dad had an encounter way back when with eric holder, when he was an up and coming lawyer and my dad was a policeman in d.c. dad put the youngster in his place! lol

Can we get your dad to take over the Justice Department?

Danzig · #38 07-08-2010, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb

Can we get your dad to take over the Justice Department?

lol
yeah, i don't see that happening...he's semi-retired, living on a golf course. works for them a few days a week, golfs for free the rest of the time.

dad had arrested a guy. holder hollered for a dismissal as soon as dad said on the witness stand he had talked to the fellow under arrest a bit before reading his rights. as dad said, and the judge agreed with him and not holder, you can talk to a suspect about things without mirandizing them-as long as the questioning is not about what you just arrested them for. holder thought he was sooo smart, lol. oops. case continued, fellow went to jail. young, gung ho lawyers...

Nascar1966 · #39 07-08-2010, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notyep59

you should just copy and paste this as your response to everything, and hooray for your wife and son!!

Thank for giving my wife and son a hooray.

Rupert Pupkin · #40 07-08-2010, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notyep59

I'm not defending anyone in this case and I have NO idea of what the facts are. Should I pretend to, like some others here might?? All I know is that you folks are upset with some group that was appointed by the Bush administration, and evidently their views changed since we have a black president. That's my simple position on this case, and if I'm wrong I will suggest that they string Holder (whoever he is) up by his sack and charge admission. My biggest question from all of this is, how is this Obama's fault?

So why are you even responding to the thread if you don't know the facts of the case? The facts of the case are not in dispute. Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and aide to Bobby Kennedy witnessed the whole thing. He was working at the polling place where the incident took place. He said it was the worst case of voter intimidation he had ever seen. He said it was worse than anything he had seen in the south in the 1960s.

The Department of Justice brought charges against the guys who were intimidating voters. It was a slam dunk case. But then inexplicably, the Obama appointees at the DOJ, forced the DOJ lawyers to drop the case. Eric Holder is the AG. He is the head of the DOJ. He was appointed by Obama and he forced the DOJ lawyers to drop this case. That is what the big deal is.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...cube_position1