![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Alex Smith did turn back into Alex Smith, but what about the Niners defense? They played a tremendous second half. Despite what happened against the Saints, they are not a high powered/high scoring offensive team. Plus the Giants defense deserves some credit as well. Is Gronk (and his bad ankle), Hernandez, Branch or Welker better than Jennings, Finley, Driver, Cobb and Jones? Maybe, maybe not, but the Giants did a pretty good job on them if you ask me (on the road). The Ellis comment doesn't even need to be addressed, because it's laughable. My question to you is, which reciever is Edelman going to cover? I have to admit that I like the Giants chances. They beat the Pats in Foxboro already, in a game where they played without Bradshaw and Nicks. Also the defense was not playing at the level they are playing now. They beat arguably the best offensive and defensive teams on the road the last two weeks. I'm not saying it's a lock, but I like their chances a lot.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" Last edited by MaTH716 : 01-25-2012 at 11:42 AM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I know Las Vegas is sharp, and I'm far from a FB expert, but I have the Giants favored by a FG by all my "metrics." I've found, historically though, that when I don't agree with a line by this much, I'M USUALLY WRONG!
Anyway, calling the final score NYG 31, NE 20. Ocala Mike |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If we are calling scores, I will go 24-23 Pats.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Giants 31 - Pats 20
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bingo!!!
Ocala Mike |