2/24: Magna, GP & FG P4's

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

here are a few horses for the under card..till byk takes the helm...

race 1 6f 6.25k claimer

pp 4 kins hurrah..had trouble in last adds blinks
pp 2 my rooster jerkins uses carter for bomb plays ..hasnt shown much ..but
works and the uske off angle..


race 2 1 mile maiden 25k

pp 2 mini drop...usually when you claim off t pleach you suffer..like this one abit
pp 6 sensational note last looked like a workout to me will be a price for sure
his mile jogs make me think put over..

race 3 1 mile and 1/16 turf 25 claimer

pp 7 western missle will be overlooked on current form..but,,i make a case that this one will contend on back class and tr stat..

pp 5 big bold place ..

race 4 maiden spec wt 44k these are two for under exotics..

pp11 .golden glade barker pops a no from time to time

pp 5 silver source ..claimed off ckuck he was on his way..

race 5 1 mile and 1/16 turf 25k claimer

pp 10 dream on dream on..
pp 5 form bloom ownes trains..guid makes amends for 10th fri..


race 6 6f maiden spec wt

pp 2 mogle man...dt poster said he can dooooooooooo
pp 7 tahir prado/ adena..pulled wool over the eyes of most fri..

good luck ..just a few i think will be in the mix

Hooves...Look for Knapp to get tired of losing,and open the special jar.

[Kasept]

Thx folks.. Glad some caught it.. Was a very good sequence. Sorry about the misprint with the 7 (as 6-Trendy Lady in the 8th) but obviously wasn't leaving the 3-5 favorite off..

I was real pleased getting Twilight Meteor on top in the Hallandale and Jambalaya in the feature.. Andy really opened my eyes on Jamba's potential there. Liked him a little Friday when capping, when on ATRAB Andy really gave him a push...

$15.00 and $16.20 respectively...

As for Magna.. It was a very tough head loss in that crappy maiden claimer to cost us all the score.. If you listened to ATRAB last night though, Andy ALSO touted this Abrams upsetter...

Hope folks did well..

[swedejxn]

Originally Posted by swedejxn

gp late 4


3,7,8
6,8
2,3,4
2,6,10

Thanks Grits... I played it ... 450 and change... But I gotta give Kudos to those that touted Jambalaya.... that really helped....

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Kasept

Thx folks.. Glad some caught it.. Was a very good sequence. Sorry about the misprint with the 7 (as 6-Trendy Lady in the 8th) but obviously wasn't leaving the 3-5 favorite off..

I was real pleased getting Twilight Meteor on top in the Hallandale and Jambalaya in the feature.. Andy really opened my eyes on Jamba's potential there. Liked him a little Friday when capping, when on ATRAB Andy really gave him a push...

$15.00 and $16.20 respectively...

As for Magna.. It was a very tough head loss in that crappy maiden claimer to cost us all the score.. If you listened to ATRAB last night though, Andy ALSO touted this Abrams upsetter...

Hope folks did well..

Ya know, this was one Magna 5 where I feel like you and I blew it. I only handicapped the Laurel and Santa Anita races because I was going on the show. I didn't like the winner of the 6 1/2 Furlong turf race, but you obviously did, and with the 4 scratching out of the Santa Anita 4th we could easily have put this together. Did it really pay over $8K??? Was that for $1 as DRF said in the results? Missed opportunity.

Hard to complain however when I have never played the bet before....but this was the first time I ever looked at all five races.

[docicu3]

The minimum wager is $2 and there were 56 winning tickets for $8562.20 each. I wonder how the pool sizes compared to other weeks with better or more high profile races?

As Matt said earlier it was all right in front of us in the tickets played but somehow in the flow of the day, it became less important and thus elusive......too bad it was very hittable if there is such a word.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

if honey got up we had it..if if if............

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by docicu3

The minimum wager is $2 and there were 56 winning tickets for $8562.20 each. I wonder how the pool sizes compared to other weeks with better or more high profile races?

As Matt said earlier it was all right in front of us in the tickets played but somehow in the flow of the day, it became less important and thus elusive......too bad it was very hittable if there is such a word.

It's always easy to say " I could have hit this " when you didn't even try to put it together. To be honest, it would have taken a real investment on my part. Assuming one ticket, I would have had to have used three at Laurel, a minimum of three at Gulfstream, probably two in the 10th at Gulf, three in the SA 4th and as many as five in the 5th. So 3 x 3 x 3 x 2 x 5 is a $540 play. Well, frankly, even splitting it I wouldn't have put that in. Now, with multiple tickets perhaps it would have been less, but the Sa 4th winner would not have been an A which means somehow the SA 5th winner would have had to have been at least a B and I'm not sure that would have happened....at least for me. Thus, the lessen is, especially in complicated bets, saying " I could have hit that " is simply BS as having the winners and getting them all on the same ticket are two very different things.....at least depending on bankroll or investment.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

if honey got up we had it..if if if............

That's too bad ( though I bet Jambalaya to win so I won't cry too hard for you ) but it would have paid SIGNIFICANTLY less if she had won. Jambalaya was the biggest priced winner.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

It's always easy to say " I could have hit this " when you didn't even try to put it together. To be honest, it would have taken a real investment on my part. Assuming one ticket, I would have had to have used three at Laurel, a minimum of three at Gulfstream, probably two in the 10th at Gulf, three in the SA 4th and as many as five in the 5th. So 3 x 3 x 3 x 2 x 5 is a $540 play. Well, frankly, even splitting it I wouldn't have put that in. Now, with multiple tickets perhaps it would have been less, but the Sa 4th winner would not have been an A which means somehow the SA 5th winner would have had to have been at least a B and I'm not sure that would have happened....at least for me. Thus, the lessen is, especially in complicated bets, saying " I could have hit that " is simply BS as having the winners and getting them all on the same ticket are two very different things.....at least depending on bankroll or investment.

yes exactly if you look at our group plays mag 5 thread..i tried to back the strongest angles as the ticket unfolded.. i was wrong that honey rider was the correct play to go big with..in fact the horse you and steve also liked jamb..was the one to include heavy......

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

yes exactly if you look at our group plays mag 5 thread..i tried to back the strongest angles as the ticket unfolded.. i was wrong that honey rider was the correct play to go big with..in fact the horse you and steve also liked jamb..was the one to include heavy......

You were only wrong in resulting and you had to take a stand somewhere to make your ticket managable. If you put $600 - $800 you probably would have hit it.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

You were only wrong in resulting and you had to take a stand somewhere to make your ticket managable. If you put $600 - $800 you probably would have hit it.

turn the page.......when your wrong your wrong.....nothing is easy in muli-race exotics........