Betting The Preakness - Page 3

Cajungator26 · #41 05-15-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentToStud

Can't you assign it to an intern or assistant?

Well get to it, B! Thanks for offering.

SentToStud · #42 05-15-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

Well get to it, B! Thanks for offering.

I'll send it downstairs to the lab. I'll get back to you in 2-6 weeks.

zippyneedsawin · #43 05-15-2007, 04:47 PM

sigh... I guess I'm the intern.

Menifee was the 2-1 favorite:

http://horseracing.about.com/library...y/aa051599.htm

Victory Gallop was the favorite at 9-5

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mor...eakness_final/

Cajungator26 · #44 05-15-2007, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zippyneedsawin

sigh... I guess I'm the intern.

Menifee was the 2-1 favorite:

http://horseracing.about.com/library...y/aa051599.htm

Victory Gallop was the favorite at 9-5

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mor...eakness_final/

Crazy that Charismatic was 8-1! What a gift!!!

SentToStud · #45 05-15-2007, 04:54 PM

This all remnds me that if it weren't for Strike the Gold, Best Pal and Hansel Mane Minister would have won the Triple Crown.

zippyneedsawin · #46 05-15-2007, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

Crazy that Charismatic was 8-1! What a gift!!!

I know.. even Giacomo was 6-1.

philcski · #47 05-15-2007, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew

But weren't Victory Gallop and Menifee both favored in the Preakness? (I am too lazy to research this, so I could be wrong.)

I think you're missing my point.
If this was the 2nd at Aqueduct and these were 20k claimers named A, B, and C, and you didn't like any of the longshot new shooters, given your opinion that A will win and B or C will likely finish 2nd, would you bet it A over B and C with exactas at $12 and $18 instead of a win bet at 6/5? I would certainly hope so. That is extracting maximum value out of your opinion.

justindew · #48 05-15-2007, 05:23 PM

If it was not the Preakness, I would probably pass the race.

That being said, I think Street Sense might actually offer slight value at 6-5.

philcski · #49 05-15-2007, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew

If it was not the Preakness, I would probably pass the race.

That being said, I think Street Sense might actually offer slight value at 6-5.

Now that is a statement I can agree with you on.

My only goal is to have a live pick 4 to Street Sense and Hard Spun.
If Hard Spun is 9-2 or higher (EXTREMELY doubtful) I'll consider a win bet.

Charismatic1 · #50 05-15-2007, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew

Here are examples of horses since 1996, off the top of my head, that did not run to their odds in the Preakness, where their odds were based on their Derby efforts:

Prince of Thieves
Cavonnier (injured in the Preakness)
Victory Gallop (Ran well, but didn't win)
Menifee (Ran well, but didn't win)
Medaglia D' Oro
Peace Rules
Imperialism
Lion Heart
Closing Argument

It does not happen every year, but ALMOST every year, a horse who runs a terrific race in the Derby gets heavily bet in the Preakness, and comes up short. That's all I'm saying. I think Hard Spun will be added to that list this year.

Horses that closed well in the Derby without winning like Victory Gallop and Menifee and Afleet Alex don't bug me with their ability or inability to duplicate a good effort in the Preakness. I usually think they will. However, a misguided approach to closers in the Preakness is that a "smaller field + adequate pace = less traffic = he'll be able to make the clean run he couldn't make in the Derby". My belief is that if he couldn't close the deal in the Derby scenario, he won't be able to in the Preakness. My only * is in the case of a mistimed ride in the Derby like Rose on Afleet Alex (Point Given could also fit here). Also, I generally have the opinion that a deep closing Derby winner cannot wheel back and win the Preakness. Perhaps I'm wrong, but at the top of my head I do not believe any of the Triple Crown Wannabes since The Bid used a deep closing style to win BOTH races. At this time, I'm not sure why, but I've seen both explosive Derby closers (Monarchos) and grinding Derby closers (Giacomo) run flat in Baltimore. Oddly, I still like Street Sense's chances on Saturday, but that's probably because his agility and gears remind me a bit of Afleet Alex. Can nostalgia be a new *?

In most years, I would totally agree about Hard Spun. His performance in the Derby would definitely lump him with Lion Heart, Peace Rules, and Congaree in recent years. All ran HUGE races near or on a fast pace and held on real strong. Like Justin said, they were all bet hard in the Preakness and didn't run to their odds. However, I totally disagree with the way those horses were trained in between races. Their trainers would gallop them no further than 10 furlongs on any given day and they would breeze 5 poles in a minute flat the Monday or Tuesday before the Preakness. It doesn't seem like much, but I think it is unnecessary and that doing too much in one area and too little in another actually puts "edge" on the horse - and they proved that. Larry Jones is not breezing Hard Spun at all, and the horse is having really strong gallops of usually 12 furlongs or a little more everyday. John Servis and Tim Ritchey did this a couple years ago, and those performances were just a wee bit good. Also, this method will take edge off Hard Spun, so I think we can expect to see him stalking in the Preakness rather than on the lead (unless he's draws inside). I expect him to run big, but I can always say "I should've known" if he pulls a Peace Rules type race.

So, my theme for this year's Preakness is all about asterisks.

ArlJim78 · #51 05-15-2007, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charismatic1

Horses that closed well in the Derby without winning like Victory Gallop and Menifee and Afleet Alex don't bug me with their ability or inability to duplicate a good effort in the Preakness. I usually think they will. However, a misguided approach to closers in the Preakness is that a "smaller field + adequate pace = less traffic = he'll be able to make the clean run he couldn't make in the Derby". My belief is that if he couldn't close the deal in the Derby scenario, he won't be able to in the Preakness. My only * is in the case of a mistimed ride in the Derby like Rose on Afleet Alex (Point Given could also fit here). Also, I generally have the opinion that a deep closing Derby winner cannot wheel back and win the Preakness. Perhaps I'm wrong, but at the top of my head I do not believe any of the Triple Crown Wannabes since The Bid used a deep closing style to win BOTH races. At this time, I'm not sure why, but I've seen both explosive Derby closers (Monarchos) and grinding Derby closers (Giacomo) run flat in Baltimore. Oddly, I still like Street Sense's chances on Saturday, but that's probably because his agility and gears remind me a bit of Afleet Alex. Can nostalgia be a new *?

In most years, I would totally agree about Hard Spun. His performance in the Derby would definitely lump him with Lion Heart, Peace Rules, and Congaree in recent years. All ran HUGE races near or on a fast pace and held on real strong. Like Justin said, they were all bet hard in the Preakness and didn't run to their odds. However, I totally disagree with the way those horses were trained in between races. Their trainers would gallop them no further than 10 furlongs on any given day and they would breeze 5 poles in a minute flat the Monday or Tuesday before the Preakness. It doesn't seem like much, but I think it is unnecessary and that doing too much in one area and too little in another actually puts "edge" on the horse - and they proved that. Larry Jones is not breezing Hard Spun at all, and the horse is having really strong gallops of usually 12 furlongs or a little more everyday. John Servis and Tim Ritchey did this a couple years ago, and those performances were just a wee bit good. Also, this method will take edge off Hard Spun, so I think we can expect to see him stalking in the Preakness rather than on the lead (unless he's draws inside). I expect him to run big, but I can always say "I should've known" if he pulls a Peace Rules type race.

So, my theme for this year's Preakness is all about asterisks.

Good analysis, I agree with your general comments. I didn't know what training method Larry Jones was using to prep Hard Spun for the Preakness, but the approach you've outlined, with the long gallops makes sense to me. If Street Sense doesn't get his usual rail run, I wouldn't be shocked at all to see Hard Spun take it.

blackthroatedwind · #52 05-15-2007, 07:30 PM

Out of curiosity, since you keep bringing him up, do you remember Prince of Thieves and the kind of racehorse he was?

Honestly, nobody in control of their senses gave him a shot in the world in the Preakness.

blackthroatedwind · #53 05-15-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

Crazy that Charismatic was 8-1! What a gift!!!

You must have scored out!

Cajungator26 · #54 05-15-2007, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

You must have scored out!

Wasn't betting back then, Andy. Just a casual fan.

blackthroatedwind · #55 05-15-2007, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26

Wasn't betting back then, Andy. Just a casual fan.

Here's today's trivia question....without looking who was third in that Preakness?

blackthroatedwind · #56 05-15-2007, 08:51 PM

And....where did that horse's name come from?

blackthroatedwind · #57 05-15-2007, 08:53 PM

He's named for a great rock 'n roll song.

And I think Aquilino did train him.

justindew · #58 05-15-2007, 08:54 PM

Blackthroatedwind,

I believe Editor's Note was 3rd in 1996.

Here's what I remember about Prince of Thieves:

-He ran 3rd in the Derby.
-Lukas took Pat Day off the horse in favor of Bailey for the Preakness.
-His breeding closely resembled that of Timber Country, who won the Preakness one year earlier. (I think that was Prince of Thieves. I won't swear to it.)
-I think his odds were lower than Louis Quatorze's, and LQ was around 8-1.

As far as I remember, Prince of Thieves was considered a contender in the 1996 Preakness.

blackthroatedwind · #59 05-15-2007, 08:56 PM

But Timber Country was a proven good horse.

I always thought Prince of Thieves was a bit of a bum so perhaps I'm biased.

I was talking about third in the Charismatic Preakness.

Cajungator26 · #60 05-15-2007, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew

Blackthroatedwind,

I believe Editor's Note was 3rd in 1996.

Here's what I remember about Prince of Thieves:

-He ran 3rd in the Derby.
-Lukas took Pat Day off the horse in favor of Bailey for the Preakness.
-His breeding closely resembled that of Timber Country, who won the Preakness one year earlier. (I think that was Prince of Thieves. I won't swear to it.)
-I think his odds were lower than Louis Quatorze's, and LQ was around 8-1.

As far as I remember, Prince of Thieves was considered a contender in the 1996 Preakness.

Charismatic won the Preakness in 1999.

As for the show horse, his name was Badge. Doesn't he stand up in NY somewhere? I didn't realize he was named after a song.