#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
have you seen Exxon Mobils profits?? |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
IF they are even getting a piece of the US wagering pie (others on the board are much more equipped to answer that question). |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Agree with both Scav and ArlJim. Absolutely nothing wrong with taking 4/5 on a horse that ought to be 2/5. Sometimes the bettors are so eager to find a reason NOT to bet the big fav, that they do create an opportunity. And sometimes they just fail to see how much better a horse is than the rest of the field.
But also agree with ArlJim that it's not at all obvious (to me) that Curlin deserves to be 2/5 against an international field after traveling half way across the world. In October he wasn't an obvious fav in the BC Classic. I don't think that one awesome race makes him the dominant World horse that would justify 2/5 against this field. Now that I think about it, horseracing may be the only area where there is a large school of thought that taking even money is a horrible proposition. Sports bettors routinely take 10/11. Blackjack cardcounters accept the even money payoff of the game (with the roughly 5% chance of getting a 3:2 payoff added in) without wincing. Many poker players thrive in heads-up games where they will at best win even money. --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It would be difficult for the oil companies to continue exploration and drilling if the barrel goes below $100. Sure there is plenty of oil left, it's just not as easy to get to. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
;>) Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |