Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Just from stakes winners on the synthetics that are clearly better on it then on the dirt. I'm sure I could find far more if I used stakes placed as well.
Dominican
Panty Raid
Piratesonthelake
Steve's Double
Slew's Tizzy
Christmas Kid
Off Duty
Stream Cat
Danzon
Lewis Michael
Lady Belsara
Silent Name
Mary Delaney
Massive Drama (might be fine in a dirt sprint)
Texas Fever
(spot reserved for Monba)
(spot reserved for Cowboy Cal)
On the contrary I only found three horses that fit the profile of the turf horse flourishing on the synthetics that wouldn't be able to run a step on the dirt that did actually come back to win at similar levels on the dirt:
Asi Siempre
Heatseeker
Spotsgone
|
Didn't Spotsgone win a Grade 3 at Hoosier last summmer?
The synethic vs dirt conversation is getting crazy tiresome. There will be tons of arguments for both sides of it. It is basically comes down to two things, people either changing their handicapping or not changing, and the fact that it benefits spread players (because of the lack of consistency). And if you play polytrack like you play turf (I contend that cushion, while the results are a little squirrely sometimes, plays like a dirt track alot more then polytrack does) then who gives a ****, handicap it like a turf race and be done with it.
Personally, handicapping is handicapping, surface aint changing that. And I love all surfaces, and quite honestly, I love Polytrack because it is more like turf racing, and I like betting on turf racing, so it fits me well.
You know what else I like about it, some of these guys actually have to TRAIN a horse instead of putting all this damn speed into them and taking advantage of bias. Look at Baffert, where you at now that you actually have to put wind into your horses? I could train on a california old track. "Work the horse 34" and on race day "Get to the rail and GO"