#41
|
|||
|
|||
i don't see how waiting to breed an unsound horse til they're five or six is going to strengthen the breed. if they want sound, you'll see a change. but simply dictating the age at which a horse can be bred won't change anything. many of the horses are still not what breeders used to seek. most now want speed-well, you've got that, but at a price. eight belles gets the attention since she was lost-but what about the winner? no one really says much about the fact that they derby was his fourth lifetime start. yet farms are already foaming at the mouth at the thought of getting him for their farm.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Moss is right -- but doesn't go far enough
Tradition can't be used to justify the problems that are all too evident today in racing. The gambling industry is regulated -- at least in theory -- and can thus be forced to change and reduce the incentives for misbehavior by the owners and trainers.
Moss is right about the need for change -- and I think more needs to be done. I'd push the Breeders Cup races to the spring and switch TC to the fall (spaced out with three weeks between). And I wouldn't allow any 2 year olds in the BC. That way, the one "big" 3 year old race -- a "juvenile mile" -- in the BC would be more of a prep for the later fall, than an afterthought. I'd also push sponsorship for a "mature" horse series of races -- perhaps three races spread out over the whole year for 4 year old's and up? Last edited by Runningincircles : 06-08-2008 at 09:50 PM. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Giving riders days and actually making them explain why they did what they did during a race helps the sport. If Eibar Coa was riding in Hong Kong or Australia, he would only be able to ride about 10% of the time, the rest being on the sidelines for infractions. |