#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Louis Quartorze only won one G1 (the Preakness) and got beat a nose in the Classic, but would absolutely destroy Lookin at Lucky. Look at the horses he got beat by. Hennessy, Maria's Mon, Unbridled's Song, Editor's Note, Skip Away, Will's Way, Cigar, Alphabet Soup. Every one of those horses would be a heavy favorite in the Classic (except Hennessy, being a sprinter.) He would be 3/5 against this group- or less- on his own merit. And the scary thing is, it could be argued that was the 3rd best of the 3yo crops between 1995-1997. http://www1.drf.com/tc/preakness/201...n-at-lucky.pdf To be clear, just because the current group isn't that good doesn't mean I'm not looking forward to it. It will be a great two days of racing at the best BC venue. Definitely.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That's the oddest 'typo' I've ever seen. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
While I can appreciate the 1996 3YO crop being tough, when did winning races stop counting? I liked Lookin at Lucky's Haskell a lot. His Preakness, while not as visually impressive as you might like, I thought it was impressive enough coming out of the beating he took in the Derby. I'll take my chances with him on November 6.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The point of my post, which was missed by RHT as well, was that this year's "big 4", in other years, would have all been mid-range contenders to say the least. Lookin At Lucky on paper was similar to Louis Quatorze, who went off at 18-1. What price will the former be? Doesn't mean Lookin At Lucky can't win this year. Louis Quatorze almost did. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
I was comparing their respective talent.
Louis Quatorze was in a different zip code than Lookin at Lucky.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Since I'm in a very nitpicky frame of mind today, I was wondering which zip codes those two horses would be from??
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The Skip Away-Formal Gold-Will's Way battles were epic enough. What kind of armageddon would have been unleashed if he was in there as well? |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Apparently not "epic enough" for those HotY voters… |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Man, you are dumb.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
From the guy whose greatest horse evar is one loss away from ending a 19 of 20 career with 0 HOTY awards.
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
I think she deserved at least 1.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Dude, that's harsh.
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I think this year's field is better than the last two and better than the field that St. Liam beat in 2005. I don't think its anywhere close to 2006 or 2007...
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
100% better then the St Liam group. RHT did not get to run
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
& Honour and Glory
__________________
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
my #1 doubleplusgood favorite horsey of all time. I still see Zito quotes recently saying he was as talented a horse that he's ever trained.
__________________
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
40510!
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Honour and Glory was a hell of a horse. He would be a top sprinter/miler in any of the last 15-20 years IMO.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
He was not a late developer. He was just flat out good.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |