#61
|
|||
|
|||
The only similarity between the two teams is they both like p.ussy.
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
I don't fault anyone that likes fish, but of course, looking at the source of this statement, it is just another of your idiotic generalizations inferring that all women that play basketball are dykes.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
It's a joke, you dumb creepy f.uck.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Cannon, the recruiting in wcb is a lot more intense than you might think. Because of Title IX, the women receive just as many scholarships as the men. That money is going to be spent even if the program loses money. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
You talk a lot but say nothing.
I especially enjoyed your psychological analysis of a girl you only know through watching her play basketball. And all of your "insider" information on her father. Just come out as a true douche and post your sports blog, you long-winded Faux intellectual. Last edited by Kasept : 12-24-2010 at 01:22 PM. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
I'll be back later and expect you to reply in kind, slewbopper. You need to address the hypocrisy or do the wise thing and leave a much more powerful troll be. You don't and cannot f.uck with me. No matter how old school you are, son.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...ient=firefox-a http://ladyvols.blogspot.com/2007/11...ker-alert.html Can't have it both ways. Child please. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The difference in talent that UCLA was getting back then in comparison to what most other teams were getting is staggering. There were a few teams back then that went undefeated. If not for injuries in 1975, the hoosiers would probably have done it two years in a row. Isn't it interesting that since that 1976 Hoosier team, no NCAA men's team has finished undefeated? Why is that? The game was much different then. There were a maximum of 25 teams in the tournament until 1975 when they expanded to 32 teams. Recruiting was different then. It was more regional. There certainly weren't any other teams out west that were getting kids to come nationally like UCLA was. Other programs simply weren't paying the kind of money to kids that UCLA had been paying. That being the case, UCLA had a huge advantage. Sure they played midwest and east coast powers too, but a majority of the win streak came against overmatched west coast schools. Then they get to the tournament when you have to play a couple of tough games but the tourney for them back then was only like three games with no conference tourney. Basketball was a much different game then. Yes, if you had a mens basketball team go on an 88 game winning streak TODAY, comparing UCONN'S winning streak would be pretty dumb. But taking into account the differences in the men's game back then and UCLA's massive competitive advantage over its foes, I think the streaks are much more comparable than some think. |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Now, if you want to say that they would get beaten by a pretty good boys high school basketball team, I could agree with that. Heck, we have some boys teams in our area that could beat some men's college teams. Dematha or Montrose Christian would beat some division 1 men's teams. There is little doubt in my mind that they could handle UConn women. The difference is mainly in size and not as much in skill although that would vary depending on the team. Top high school teams will have 6'6 wings and centers 6' 8" and up while women's teams are generally going to be shorter and smaller. In my mind, a "c" level high school team will have players that are about the same size or even smaller than the Uconn women and probably wouldn't be anywhere near as skilled and certainly not anywhere near as well coached or seasoned. The same would go for most division 2 or 3 schools and even some bad division 1 schools. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
dalakhani.... The top women's programs practice against men that attend their school, generally former high school players that are not good enough for the men's program. Probably the coaches at UConn, Tennessee, Duke, etc. would have the best idea what level men's teams they would be competitive against. Most of us can only speculate
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
The streak will in all likelihood end tonight at Stanford. UConn is a very thin team that depends on 7 core players with two frosh sharing the post duties, one of whom is undersized at 6'1. Stanford has five quality post players ranging from 6'2 to 6'5. UConn's senior back up guard is out with a foot injury. Maya will play 40 minutes but it means that none of the 1 2 or 3 positions will get a rest. Early foul trouble to any player will be a killer
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
Nice call slewbopper.
Anyone know if there was a line? |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Probably not, hence another reason why most people don't give a damn.
Reguardless, it was still a good call by Slew.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
From a lesbian trapped in a man's body, take that pantywaist puss/y pants
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
That's your team. It's a win-win for you because you're a troll and all you really care about is being right. Add to the fact you're a sissy and of course you're going to pick against your team on the road because what's the worst that could happen? They win?
You might as well ask tampax to sponsor your post. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Uconn was minus 11.
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
He was probably jonesing because he hadn't lied on here all day.
|