#61
|
|||
|
|||
I'm just curious....why is it that you seem to jump in every Vic Stauffer thread on every forum and defend him?
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
I dont think I have ever defended Vic but the above question is fair. Cardus is all over him. Even during my multiple bans I can still get on and read and it happens all the time.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#64
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Then to the comparison against Wrona (whom I have no issues with, he's a solid announcer). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Obviously everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but if you are going to give a total rip job to a guy, you should at least have some valid arguments. To fabricate and exaggerate minor points to make your own agenda look valid is kind of lame. I'm sure some sort of fluff piece would have gotten mixed reviews around here too. Some would have thought it was nice and others would have maybe mocked and taken a shot or two, especially if the fluff was exaggerated as much as the negatives were in this piece.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Someone says they feel awful, cut to the core, moment of weakness and the response is this is "funny". I always respect your opinion too. MIne is just different from yours. It was very mean, in my opinion. |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
That's fine if he doesn't like Vic. Same goes for the guy who wrote the article. My issue is that the writer goes public and gives no real basis for the rip job he gave Vic.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just be patient. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Its because they dont think Vic is being sincere. Whos knows how Vic really feels?
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
I'm just guessing, but I think the funny response was because he didn't buy the hurt to the core response. He was basically calling bulls.hit, not literally laughing at the thought of Vic being hurt.
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Every forum bwahaha. Are you going to let Cardus answer? It was a simple question.
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
I asked you a simple question also. Take your time.
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Because I think some people are taking unfair shots at him for no reason. Let Cardus answer and give a reason and maybe I will change my mind and agree with him. Or you can just keep jumping in and defending Cardus.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
We've been doing this for like 2 years right? I don't think anyones mind is changing at this point. |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
This has to be the single most dumb non Clyde, non Zenyatta thread in the history of DT.
Eighty plus posts and counting??? My take? The Osterman dude, or whatever the fuk his name is, was being facetious, and everything else is much ado about nothing. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
Surrender Noted
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Aren't the French and their servants the ones who are supposed to surrender?
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
Lol
|