Republican Senate Nominee:"Victims Of ‘Legitimate Rape’ Don’t Get Pregnant"

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

lots of disclaimers in there. zero quotes.
You posted bills, I read the first one and saw nothing other than financial explanations.
I ask for a quote from a doc you posted that proves your point and I get a couple videos and potential effects as read by women's rights groups.
This is the process of debating you and the reason so few remain that are willing to do so.

Again: what are you saying? Be clear!

I said, "This current congress has introduced over 40 bills attempting to restrict abortion and womens' rights".

Are you saying my statement is false? Yes or no? Are you saying the GOP has not introduced bills to restrict women's rights and abortion? Yes or no?

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

lots of disclaimers in there. zero quotes.
You posted bills, I read the first one and saw nothing other than financial explanations.
I ask for a quote from a doc you posted that proves your point and I get a couple videos and potential effects as read by women's rights groups.
This is the process of debating you and the reason so few remain that are willing to do so.

Now she will say the same thing over and over again and call you stupid. Watch.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Again: what are you saying? Be clear!

I said, "This current congress has introduced over 40 bills attempting to restrict abortion and womens' rights".

Are you saying my statement is false? Yes or no? Are you saying the GOP has not introduced bills to restrict women's rights and abortion? Yes or no?

Still saying pull one quote from one bill that actually says what you are alleging other than a fiscal notation.

But this is pointless any way, you are blind and foolish and refuse to defend your positions and I will now join the sane people of the site that ignore your time wasting answer questions with questions philosophy that you equate with debate.
fare well.

[bigrun]

Priebus: GOP platform 'not the platform of Mitt Romney'

The official platform language poised for approval at next week's Republican National Convention doesn't fully represent the party's presumptive presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday.

"I think as far as the details of some of these things, like an exception for rape or life of the mother, these are not uncommon differences that candidates have and don't share some of the detail on some of those exceptions," Priebus said on MSNBC. "This is the platform of the Republican Party; it's not the platform of Mitt Romney."

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...tt-romney?lite

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Now she will say the same thing over and over again and call you stupid. Watch.

Stop it.

Stop being ridiculous and childish and whiny, and trying to derail a talk about if women's rights are being restricted with you interspersing personal attack.

Just grow up and stop it.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Now she will say the same thing over and over again and call you stupid. Watch.

Racist.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Still saying pull one quote from one bill that actually says what you are alleging other than a fiscal notation.

But this is pointless any way, you are blind and foolish and refuse to defend your positions and I will now join the sane people of the site that ignore your time wasting answer questions with questions philosophy that you equate with debate.
fare well.

I already quoted one bill at the start of your weirdness: House Bill 3. The very first bill the GOP introduced in this congress.

I said that indeed the GOP has introduced bill after bill in this Congress, that restricts womens rights.

You are denying that exists? Yes or no? I'm trying to be clear on what you are "demanding" as "proof" of "what".

I posted 38 bills that do just that. I posted a news article that lists the first 4 anti-abortion bills this House GOP introduced their first month in office in 2010.

You say that's not proof the GOP has introduced multiple bills in the House attempting to restrict abortion and women's rights? Good lord, the GOP is proud they have introduced bills to restrict abortion! It's their party platform!

Your contention that GOP restricting women's rights is all imaginary is beyond ridiculous on it's face.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Riot

Again: what are you saying? Be clear!

I said, "This current congress has introduced over 40 bills attempting to restrict abortion and womens' rights".

Are you saying my statement is false? Yes or no? Are you saying the GOP has not introduced bills to restrict women's rights and abortion? Yes or no?

I think you don't acknowledge that you stepped in it. Again.

point out precisely in any of these bills where the proposed laws states what you are saying it states.

Nowhere.

You are making the leap to say that a proposed bill which limits the government paying for abortions = Congress attempting to restrict abortions and of course by extension, women's rights.

And you got caught.


Fool.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by bigrun

Been busy few days and i know ya'll been missing the cartoons...Here's some topical ones for your pleasure..

Clip Clop says that doesn't exist. Clip Clop says there is no attempt to restrict women's rights. It's all an unprovable lie.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

I think you don't acknowledge that you stepped in it. Again.

point out precisely in any of these bills where the proposed laws states what you are saying it states.

I started with House Bill 3. There were four bills introduced the first month of congress alone restricting abortion rights. There have been multiples since.

You are joining Clip Clop in denying they exist? Really? REALLY?

In the face of the actual bills being available, Republicans talking about them, and the news covering them?

Really? And you dare to call me a fool? Bwwwaahaaaaaaaaaaa!

God save this country from the profoundly ignorant.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Riot

I started with House Bill 3. There were four bills introduced the first month of congress restricting abortion rights.

You are denying they exist? Really? REALLY?

And you dare to call me a fool? Bwwwaahaaaaaaaaaaa!

God save this country from the profoundly ignorant.

Denying what? that the language you are on here trumpeting doesn't exist?
Really? REALLY?

Clip asked you numerous times to post precisely what, in any of these bills, seeks out to "restrict women rights"

And you respond with your usual bully tactic insults.

Please answer the question. Post precisely where, in any of these bills, the expressed purpose is to "control and restrict women's rights".

I bet you don't answer the question again. But I'm sure you'll find a way to try and insult me. Which is always good for a laugh.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Denying what? that the language you are on here trumpeting doesn't exist?

Hello - reality check on your little snit, Rude ...

I said, "The Republicans have introduced over 40 bills in Congress that attempt to restrict women's rights."

Proof provided. But why anyone would demand "proof" is bizarre. Unless they've been living in a cave? It's like asking for "proof" that Hannity exists. Hell, it's common knowledge in the real world. Massive, ongoing, constant press coverage of this issue over the past two years. Republicans brag about it, about all the bills they've introduced.

But I posted 38 bills covering abortion changes, news articles covering the first 4 bills, and the very first bill itself, House Bill 3.

Hell, Paul Ryan and Todd Akins co-wrote 4 (8?) of them together and co-sponsored them - they are PROUD to be removing women's rights to contraception and abortion.

The concept that two dudes - Rude and Clip-Clop - on an internet board proudly stand together and say, "duh, that's not true", and spending multiple posts trying to prove it, is as laughable as calling the sky not blue.

Done.

[Riot]

But let's get back to today's big news, regarding the (some think imaginary) war on women's rights -

Republicans want a constitutional amendment that raped women cannot get abortions.

They want it so badly, they have voted today, and officiallyincluded it in their Official National Republican Party Platform, as a goal to work towards.

The National Republican Party, this afternoon in Tampa, just officially approved Todd Akins position on rape as part of the 2012 National Party Platform:

Republicans drafting their party's official policy platform on Tuesday ratified a call for a Constitutional ban on abortion that makes no exceptions for rape or incest.

The vote to endorse the party's long-standing opposition to abortion and support for a "human life amendment" took place at a meeting of the GOP's official platform committee in Tampa, the site of next week's Republican National Convention.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Riot

But let's get back to today's big news, regarding the (some think imaginary) war on women's rights -

Republicans want a constitutional amendment that raped women cannot get abortions.

They want it so badly, they have voted today, and officiallyincluded it in their Official National Republican Party Platform, as a goal to work towards.

You are a proven fraud. Where in any of these 40 bills are OMG TEH DEVILL republicans purposely attempting to "restrict women's rights"?

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

how do you get the marmot in the tux?

[pointman]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Barney Frank's prostitute boyfriend runs a brothel out of Frank's home and Frank suffers no consequences and I am a bigoted, gay hater for telling the truth about something??? Hahahahaha, even though I am pro-gay marriage, hahahahaha. Riot it looks like you getting destroyed on this board is taking a toll on your sanity, I can only imagine what will happen when Obama loses in November.

Riot you didn't answer my question from before, did you suddenly evolve on gay marriage when Obama did several months ago? Was Obama a bigoted, gay hater until he evolved?

I am truly afraid that when they drag Riot off to the funny farm in November that there are provisions within the thousands of pages that is Obamacare that will allow the government to bill those of us who have argued with Riot here to pay for her psychological care.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

You are a proven fraud. Where in any of these 40 bills are OMG TEH DEVILL republicans purposely attempting to "restrict women's rights"?

They are entirely imaginary! Like the Republican Platform today, wanting a constitutional amendment restricting access to abortion for women who were raped!

Why, that doesn't restrict woman's rights, does it, Rude?

What is your opinion of that, Rude - do you think that restricts womens rights? Put up or shut up with an opinion, eh?

What about the Republicans trying to pass multiple bills to change the definition of "rape" to "forced rape" - what is your opinion of that? I mean, I know it's just me lying about it, right? It's just imaginary?

The Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press, Forbes, the bills I posted - including the one Clip -Clop couldn't read accurately on page 50 - all lying every time they had a story about them. The news stories I posted about the first four anti-abortion bills this House tried to pass in the first month back in 2012? Made up lies by the liberul media. The Republicans that bragged about these bills, like Akins and Ryan, who co-sponsored 4 of them? They are lying to you, too!

All imaginary. The Republicans haven't done a thing in the past two years to restrict the rights of women. Right, Rude? Yeah, I'm a "proven fraud" on those bills, the counts which are everywhere in news stories!

Like this one:
80: The Number Of Anti-Abortion Laws Passed By The States In 2011
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011...in-the-states/

Just a lie!

My god. The stupid and deliberate ignorance must burn. We are laughing at you, it is so very sad, how deliberately, purposely ignoring you are. Unbelievable. You stand there and you call me a liar saying there have been multiple bills passed in Congress? And I can't "prove it"?

And you want to be taken seriously? By who, the other conspiracy theorists and loons?

Yeah, the president is white, too. Oh, and rainbows shoot out your azz when you're happy.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

how do you get the marmot in the tux?

That's not a marmot. But never mind, reality doesn't matter to you Carry on.

[Rudeboyelvis]

There you go again, twisting fact in an anemic attempt support your ridiculous opinion. It is truly tiring.

What does the RNC's position on abortion with regard to incest and rape (a position I personally detest as do many high level republicans within the house and senate), have to do with these evil bills you have trumpeted as having explicit language that "restricts women's rights"??!!

Again, you continue to prove once again that you are nothing but a fraud and a pathological liar with zero credibility hiding behind the personality of an internet bully.

I feel bad for you. Not really.

I never thought I'd waste my 5,000 post responding to your nonsense

I feel bad for me.