Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 06-14-2016, 07:55 AM
Pants II's Avatar
Pants II Pants II is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,458
Default

The better question is can a white Christian be employed by a company contracted with DHS and have multiple FBI investigations and a father who spouts hate on an internet radio show and a mother who beats the father?

Would that white boy be able to purchase a weapon under this administration? Do any of you actually believe if the white boy was interviewed not once, but twice and traveled twice to Louisiana to meet with David Duke that the FBI would close the investigation?



Pray for the evil Americans under investigation for selling raw milk. They sure as f.uck know the FBI leaves no stone unturned

Have a nice day. Enjoy the time you have left on this earth. Keep voting for dems and cucks. Embrace being second-class citizens.
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 06-14-2016, 09:10 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Lets take a look at mass shootings here in the u.s.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...the-deadliest/

See, ii wondered this morning...just how many of these islamic extremist mass shootings have we had? How many in total? If we sealed our borders, how many of these shootings could have been prevented? In order of.priority, taking on the worst cause first, what should be our first target to change?

Now, barring muslim immigrstion might be the easiest solution....but we would still not have solved the problem, considering the above.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 06-14-2016, 10:07 AM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Any chance that Obama's DOJ will bring accessory after the fact charges against this cur?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/13...-massacre.html

Nah, didn't think so either. But to be fair, there's not a chance that Clinton's DOJ would either. She and hubby are much busy lining their pockets with Saudi, Qurtari, et al. money to upset the apple cart.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 06-14-2016, 12:36 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/orl...attack-n592051

Hope she gets every charge that can possibly be applied.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 06-14-2016, 02:31 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
Lets take a look at mass shootings here in the u.s.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...the-deadliest/

See, ii wondered this morning...just how many of these islamic extremist mass shootings have we had? How many in total? If we sealed our borders, how many of these shootings could have been prevented? In order of.priority, taking on the worst cause first, what should be our first target to change?

Now, barring muslim immigrstion might be the easiest solution....but we would still not have solved the problem, considering the above.
First of all, Muslims make up only 1% of the population in the US. So if they account for even just 20% of politically motivated terrorist attacks in this country, that means they are 20x more likely than anyone else to commit a terrorist attack. In addition, how many of their planned attacks have been thwarted by law enforcement? There have been dozens of attacks thwarted by law enforcement. Law enforcement has done a very good job overall in terms of monitoring suspicious people and stopping attacks before they happen. But they can't stop every attack. In addition, the financial cost and the cost in manpower is extreme. We are spending hundreds of millions of dollars monitoring these people. It's not easy to keep thousands of people under some type of surveillance. And the more of these people that are brought over here, the tougher it will be.

Right now law enforcement probably thwarts 95% of these attacks. So if there are 50 plots out there in the works every year, maybe 2 out of 50 will succeed. This past year there were two attacks that succeeded, San Bernadino and now Orlando. In many of these cases, the terrorists are people that are familiar to law enforcement. This guy was familiar to law enforcement. They had been tipped off about this guy's radical beliefs in the past. And the same goes for the Boston Marathon bombers. They had been interviewed by law enforcement in the past.

The FBI has to let these people go if there is no imminent threat. And they can't keep these people under 24 hour surveillance. Obama wants to bring in another 100,000 Syrian refugees. It's going to be impossible for law enforcement to monitor all of these people.The more of these people you bring you over here, the more plots there will be. I'm not claiming that most of these people will be terrorists. There will probably only be a very small percentage that will be terrorists or potential terrorists, maybe 1 or 2% at the most. But 1% of 100,000 is 1,000. That's a lot of potential terrorists.

I'd rather bring immigrants here from countries where we don't have to worry about these things. There is no other race or religion where we have to worry about these things. If a student comes over from Korea, is there a risk that he might be a terrorist? No. The same goes for practically every other non-Muslim country.

I think Obama honestly believes that if he brings tens of thousands of Muslims here that the Muslim population around the world will see this and then they won't dislike America any more. Obama honestly thinks it will make us safer in the long run. He lives in a fantasy world. If you have some young angry Muslim in the Middle East who wants to join ISIS, that guy is not going to chnage his mind as a result of seeing the US bring in 100,000 Syrian refugees. Obama thinks these people are rational and that their hatred for America is rational. He thinks that if we behave a little differently that they won't hate us any more. It is pure fantasy.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 06-14-2016, 03:02 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
First of all, Muslims make up only 1% of the population in the US. So if they account for even just 20% of politically motivated terrorist attacks in this country, that means they are 20x more likely than anyone else to commit a terrorist attack. In addition, how many of their planned attacks have been thwarted by law enforcement? There have been dozens of attacks thwarted by law enforcement. Law enforcement has done a very good job overall in terms of monitoring suspicious people and stopping attacks before they happen. But they can't stop every attack. In addition, the financial cost and the cost in manpower is extreme. We are spending hundreds of millions of dollars monitoring these people. It's not easy to keep thousands of people under some type of surveillance. And the more of these people that are brought over here, the tougher it will be.

Right now law enforcement probably thwarts 95% of these attacks. So if there are 50 plots out there in the works every year, maybe 2 out of 50 will succeed. This past year there were two attacks that succeeded, San Bernadino and now Orlando. In many of these cases, the terrorists are people that are familiar to law enforcement. This guy was familiar to law enforcement. They had been tipped off about this guy's radical beliefs in the past. And the same goes for the Boston Marathon bombers. They had been interviewed by law enforcement in the past.

The FBI has to let these people go if there is no imminent threat. And they can't keep these people under 24 hour surveillance. Obama wants to bring in another 100,000 Syrian refugees. It's going to be impossible for law enforcement to monitor all of these people.The more of these people you bring you over here, the more plots there will be. I'm not claiming that most of these people will be terrorists. There will probably only be a very small percentage that will be terrorists or potential terrorists, maybe 1 or 2% at the most. But 1% of 100,000 is 1,000. That's a lot of potential terrorists.

I'd rather bring immigrants here from countries where we don't have to worry about these things. There is no other race or religion where we have to worry about these things. If a student comes over from Korea, is there a risk that he might be a terrorist? No. The same goes for practically every other non-Muslim country.

I think Obama honestly believes that if he brings tens of thousands of Muslims here that the Muslim population around the world will see this and then they won't dislike America any more. Obama honestly thinks it will make us safer in the long run. He lives in a fantasy world. If you have some young angry Muslim in the Middle East who wants to join ISIS, that guy is not going to chnage his mind as a result of seeing the US bring in 100,000 Syrian refugees. Obama thinks these people are rational and that their hatred for America is rational. He thinks that if we behave a little differently that they won't hate us any more. It is pure fantasy.
Well said
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 06-14-2016, 04:00 PM
Pants II's Avatar
Pants II Pants II is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,458
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
First of all, Muslims make up only 1% of the population in the US. So if they account for even just 20% of politically motivated terrorist attacks in this country, that means they are 20x more likely than anyone else to commit a terrorist attack. In addition, how many of their planned attacks have been thwarted by law enforcement? There have been dozens of attacks thwarted by law enforcement. Law enforcement has done a very good job overall in terms of monitoring suspicious people and stopping attacks before they happen. But they can't stop every attack. In addition, the financial cost and the cost in manpower is extreme. We are spending hundreds of millions of dollars monitoring these people. It's not easy to keep thousands of people under some type of surveillance. And the more of these people that are brought over here, the tougher it will be.

Right now law enforcement probably thwarts 95% of these attacks. So if there are 50 plots out there in the works every year, maybe 2 out of 50 will succeed. This past year there were two attacks that succeeded, San Bernadino and now Orlando. In many of these cases, the terrorists are people that are familiar to law enforcement. This guy was familiar to law enforcement. They had been tipped off about this guy's radical beliefs in the past. And the same goes for the Boston Marathon bombers. They had been interviewed by law enforcement in the past.

The FBI has to let these people go if there is no imminent threat. And they can't keep these people under 24 hour surveillance. Obama wants to bring in another 100,000 Syrian refugees. It's going to be impossible for law enforcement to monitor all of these people.The more of these people you bring you over here, the more plots there will be. I'm not claiming that most of these people will be terrorists. There will probably only be a very small percentage that will be terrorists or potential terrorists, maybe 1 or 2% at the most. But 1% of 100,000 is 1,000. That's a lot of potential terrorists.

I'd rather bring immigrants here from countries where we don't have to worry about these things. There is no other race or religion where we have to worry about these things. If a student comes over from Korea, is there a risk that he might be a terrorist? No. The same goes for practically every other non-Muslim country.
Well said.

Quote:
I think Obama honestly believes that if he brings tens of thousands of Muslims here that the Muslim population around the world will see this and then they won't dislike America any more. Obama honestly thinks it will make us safer in the long run. He lives in a fantasy world. If you have some young angry Muslim in the Middle East who wants to join ISIS, that guy is not going to chnage his mind as a result of seeing the US bring in 100,000 Syrian refugees. Obama thinks these people are rational and that their hatred for America is rational. He thinks that if we behave a little differently that they won't hate us any more. It is pure fantasy.
Whatever makes you sleep better at night. Not going to disagree with you but it's hard to believe someone can be that dumb.
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 06-14-2016, 04:00 PM
bigrun's Avatar
bigrun bigrun is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VA/PA/KY
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Any chance that Obama's DOJ will bring accessory after the fact charges against this cur?

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/13...-massacre.html

Nah, didn't think so either. But to be fair, there's not a chance that Clinton's DOJ would either. She and hubby are much busy lining their pockets with Saudi, Qurtari, et al. money to upset the apple cart.

While you are at it, check the pockets of the Bush family...see where they and their friends acquired their fortunes...and I won't even mention son Dumya's invasion of Iraq..
__________________
"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think" - Clarence Darrow, American lawyer (1857-1938)

When you are right, no one remembers;when you are wrong, no one forgets.

Thought for today.."No persons are more frequently wrong, than those who will not admit
they are wrong" - Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, French moralist (1613-1680)
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 06-14-2016, 04:09 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrun View Post
While you are at it, check the pockets of the Bush family...see where they and their friends acquired their fortunes...and I won't even mention son Dumya's invasion of Iraq..
Sorry bigrun, I gotta Iggy ya. Nothing personal, I just can't take the stupid any longer. Be well.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 06-14-2016, 04:42 PM
Pants II's Avatar
Pants II Pants II is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,458
Default

Jimmy Carter was worse than Dubya and H.W. but that is beside the point and a better discussion for some watered down history forum for the cuckservative at heart.

E-mail Billy Krystalburger at National Review see if he can lead you in the right direction.
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 06-14-2016, 06:06 PM
bigrun's Avatar
bigrun bigrun is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VA/PA/KY
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Sorry bigrun, I gotta Iggy ya. Nothing personal, I just can't take the stupid any longer. Be well.
Thanks for the thumbs up, nice to see you have your hat on
__________________
"If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think" - Clarence Darrow, American lawyer (1857-1938)

When you are right, no one remembers;when you are wrong, no one forgets.

Thought for today.."No persons are more frequently wrong, than those who will not admit
they are wrong" - Francois, Duc de la Rochefoucauld, French moralist (1613-1680)
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 06-14-2016, 07:44 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/10463280
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 06-14-2016, 08:11 PM
Rileyoriley's Avatar
Rileyoriley Rileyoriley is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Snowy Woods
Posts: 4,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants II View Post
True but I was merely being an ass to prove a point. If she's allowed to be ridiculous it's tough to not mock.

Her reply to you is
I knew you weren't serious. Couldn't resist responding though. Keep up the good work.
__________________
Hillary Clinton 2016: The "Extremely Careless" Leadership America Needs!
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 06-14-2016, 10:31 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
First of all, Muslims make up only 1% of the population in the US. So if they account for even just 20% of politically motivated terrorist attacks in this country, that means they are 20x more likely than anyone else to commit a terrorist attack. In addition, how many of their planned attacks have been thwarted by law enforcement? There have been dozens of attacks thwarted by law enforcement. Law enforcement has done a very good job overall in terms of monitoring suspicious people and stopping attacks before they happen. But they can't stop every attack. In addition, the financial cost and the cost in manpower is extreme. We are spending hundreds of millions of dollars monitoring these people. It's not easy to keep thousands of people under some type of surveillance. And the more of these people that are brought over here, the tougher it will be.

Right now law enforcement probably thwarts 95% of these attacks. So if there are 50 plots out there in the works every year, maybe 2 out of 50 will succeed. This past year there were two attacks that succeeded, San Bernadino and now Orlando. In many of these cases, the terrorists are people that are familiar to law enforcement. This guy was familiar to law enforcement. They had been tipped off about this guy's radical beliefs in the past. And the same goes for the Boston Marathon bombers. They had been interviewed by law enforcement in the past.

The FBI has to let these people go if there is no imminent threat. And they can't keep these people under 24 hour surveillance. Obama wants to bring in another 100,000 Syrian refugees. It's going to be impossible for law enforcement to monitor all of these people.The more of these people you bring you over here, the more plots there will be. I'm not claiming that most of these people will be terrorists. There will probably only be a very small percentage that will be terrorists or potential terrorists, maybe 1 or 2% at the most. But 1% of 100,000 is 1,000. That's a lot of potential terrorists.

I'd rather bring immigrants here from countries where we don't have to worry about these things. There is no other race or religion where we have to worry about these things. If a student comes over from Korea, is there a risk that he might be a terrorist? No. The same goes for practically every other non-Muslim country.

I think Obama honestly believes that if he brings tens of thousands of Muslims here that the Muslim population around the world will see this and then they won't dislike America any more. Obama honestly thinks it will make us safer in the long run. He lives in a fantasy world. If you have some young angry Muslim in the Middle East who wants to join ISIS, that guy is not going to chnage his mind as a result of seeing the US bring in 100,000 Syrian refugees. Obama thinks these people are rational and that their hatred for America is rational. He thinks that if we behave a little differently that they won't hate us any more. It is pure fantasy.
First of all, the 1 percent of popularion is only if you count adults.
Second, in what universe is 1 mass shooting out of 200 20%?
The number of refugees planned is 10k, not 100k.

I find it troubling to read how many people on the watch list were cleared to buy a gun here. it is no secret that guns are easily obtained here. But there is no legislation to stop those sales. They cannot get on a plane, cannot fly out of country, but they can buy guns here, stay here, use them here.
And why is the refugee thing even mentioned in this case? The shooter was born here, in ny.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 06-14-2016, 11:28 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants II View Post
Well said.



Whatever makes you sleep better at night. Not going to disagree with you but it's hard to believe someone can be that dumb.
He's either complicit, or he is that dumb. Terrifyingly, there are no other options.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 06-15-2016, 12:41 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
First of all, the 1 percent of popularion is only if you count adults.
Second, in what universe is 1 mass shooting out of 200 20%?
The number of refugees planned is 10k, not 100k.

I find it troubling to read how many people on the watch list were cleared to buy a gun here. it is no secret that guns are easily obtained here. But there is no legislation to stop those sales. They cannot get on a plane, cannot fly out of country, but they can buy guns here, stay here, use them here.
And why is the refugee thing even mentioned in this case? The shooter was born here, in ny.
There are 3 million Muslims in the US. That is 1% of the population.

With regard to mass shootings and murders, I specifically said "politically motivated" shootings. I wasn't referring to all shootings.

Obama is going to bring in a minimum of 10,000 Syrian refugees this year alone. They are going to bring in a total of 185,000 refugees (from all over the world, not just Syria) over the next two years. How many of those 185,000 refugees are Muslim? Even if it's only 50,000, that is in just two years. And if many liberals and people in his administration had their way, they would bring in 100,000 just from Syria: "A letter made public last week and signed by several former Obama administration officials urged the U.S. government to accept 100,000 Syrian migrants, and to put in place special rules to speed the resettlement process."

http://nypost.com/2015/09/20/john-ke...ext-two-years/

With regard to your comment that the shooter was born here, that is true. But who cares where this particular one was born? Of the hundreds arrested over the last few years who were planning attacks, a high percentage of them were not born here. The woman in San Bernardino was not born here. The 9/11 hijackers were not born here. They only killed 3,000 people. There is nothing we can do about second generation Muslims that were born here. They are US citizens. They are here to stay. But there is something we can do about the ones that weren't born here. Don't bring them over here in the first place.

I agree with you that this guy should not have been able to buy a gun. But I doubt that would have stopped him. The guy in San Bernardino simply had a friend buy the gun for him. It makes it tougher if they can't buy a gun legally, but it ultimately will not prevent them from getting one, if they want one bad enough. That being said, I would have no problem with them passing a law that would not allow people on the terrorist watch list to be able to buy guns, assuming that there were proven ties to real terrorists. My only concern would be that this administration would probably try to put right-wingers on the list. I think Obama thinks Christians are more of a threat than Muslims. They would probably want to put anyone that reads Breitbart or WND on the terrorist watch list. LOL. That's actually not that far-fetched when you have people like Lois Lerner in the government

Last edited by Rupert Pupkin : 06-15-2016 at 12:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 06-15-2016, 12:57 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
He's either complicit, or he is that dumb. Terrifyingly, there are no other options.
I agree. Those are the only two possible options.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 06-15-2016, 07:41 AM
Pants II's Avatar
Pants II Pants II is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,458
Default

Confiscate all of the legally registered guns but it's not going to solve the problem.

Most of us who aren't brainwashed by the liberals know that the law enforcement agencies aren't going into the sharia and gang zones to confiscate. Our leaders and the police don't have the balls to do anything about the criminals. In fact before this latest terror attack Bernie and Obama were talking about freeing minority criminals. (Yeah they didn't necessarily say minorities but anyone who can fog a mirror knows what they're talking about).

We really should, at the very least, be having impeachment proceedings. After yesterdays "lecture" he is clearly not mentally fit to lead the next 7 months.

But nobody in the beltway has any balls. They all start menstruating when Trump acts halfway like a man.
__________________
RIP identity politics 1965-2016
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 06-15-2016, 07:50 AM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

This guy pledged support to both ISIL and Hezbollah, who are in conflict with each other. What he didn't understand about actual Islamic extremism would fill an encyclopedia. He was a closeted homophobe.

As for his (physically and emotionally abused) wife, I suspect she figured reporting it to the cops would go something like this:

1) She calls FBI/police
2) They investigate, find no grounds to do anything
3) He kills her

What you can count on is that a mass shooter will most likely be white, and almost certainly be male. Dig a little bit into his character and you'll find out he likely also hates women and brown folk which he'll have expounded at at some length about on the internet.

But sure, let's blame it on the religion a lot of brown folk practice. Move along, nothing to see here.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 06-15-2016, 07:59 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk View Post
This guy pledged support to both ISIL and Hezbollah, who are in conflict with each other. What he didn't understand about actual Islamic extremism would fill an encyclopedia. He was a closeted homophobe.

As for his (physically and emotionally abused) wife, I suspect she figured reporting it to the cops would go something like this:

1) She calls FBI/police
2) They investigate, find no grounds to do anything
3) He kills her

What you can count on is that a mass shooter will most likely be white, and almost certainly be male. Dig a little bit into his character and you'll find out he likely also hates women and brown folk which he'll have expounded at at some length about on the internet.

But sure, let's blame it on the religion a lot of brown folk practice. Move along, nothing to see here.
You need to make up numbers to support your points.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.