The Dedgradation of the American Dialogue - Page 9

Riot · #**161** 06-12-2009, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

i saw the 'creation museum' on t.v. when it first opened. i thought it sounded hilarious.

It's not hilarious when little children are asked science questions, they eagerly raise their hands with the answers they learned in school, seen on the Discovery Channel, etc - and they are told they are wrong.

Of course, opinion, fact, wild-azzed guess, "what I feel strongly" - it all has the same weight in the empirical world, to some.

Danzig · #**162** 06-12-2009, 01:52 PM

what gets me most would be the people who say there's no such thing as evolution-i then mention eohippus. we'd never have jocks making weight had horses remained in their orirginal form.

Antitrust32 · #**163** 06-12-2009, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

what gets me most would be the people who say there's no such thing as evolution-i then mention eohippus. we'd never have jocks making weight had horses remained in their orirginal form.

Yes they'd be able to make weight cause we were like 18 inches tall back then.

Maybe its the jockeys that have never evolved?

Riot · #**164** 06-12-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

what gets me most would be the people who say there's no such thing as evolution-i then mention eohippus. we'd never have jocks making weight had horses remained in their orirginal form.

LOL - the explaination, OBVIOUSLY, has to be that all things ever found fossilized were here all at once, at the same time, all placed here by God by the end of the 6th day - but some of it has died out. Carbon dating = Just "a theory"

Cannon Shell · #**165** 06-12-2009, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn

ok then.

I thought you were a Republican.

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.

#**166** 06-12-2009, 02:01 PM

As a science teacher I have fought this battle...
its really not worth it.

So I again will paraphrase Jonathan Swift on this one:

Do not attempt to reason a man (or pregnant woman) out of
something they did not reason themselves into.

There is no arguement.
Mainly because some people do not have
a grasp of what science is, and is not.

Its quite futile imo...

If they really are searching for a reasonable truth,
they will find it. Eventually. I hope. Maybe not...

Riot · #**167** 06-12-2009, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgardn

As a science teacher I have fought this battle...
its really not worth it.

So I again will paraphrase Jonathan Swift on this one:

Do not attempt to reason a man (or pregnant woman) out of
something they did not reason themselves into.

There is no arguement.
Mainly because some people do not have
a grasp of what science is, and is not.

Its quite futile imo...

If they really are searching for a reasonable truth,
they will find it. Eventually. I hope. Maybe not...

But, c'mon, how about that gravity thing? That's easy.

Riot · #**168** 06-12-2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678

i beg to differ , there are some in this country that are addicted to sex , just like boose , drugs or horses

That's not the choice being discussed. The choice is birth control or baby.

#**169** 06-12-2009, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

But, c'mon, how about that gravity thing? That's easy.

If you really want me to play the role of the other side...

Gravity is very diff.
It is a purely physical phenomena that
is much cleaner than something as messy
as life.

SOREHOOF · #**170** 06-13-2009, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Okay, Sorehoof becomes president tomorrow. What is your first act of business to set america up for the future?

Sorry it took so long to get back. Here goes... Appoint cabinet members who have paid their taxes, send pork filled spending bills back to Congress for another try, an investigation into Fanny and Freddy is an excellent idea, drill for our own oil, get the ball rolling on nookular energy (loved it when Bush said "nookular") enforce immigration laws that are already on the books, appoint a supreme court justice who shows a knowledge of constitutional law not one who's decisions have been overturned more than 50% of the time, not get involved in running banks and auto manufacturers, make Bush tax cuts permanent, cut capital gains tax, cut inheritance tax, give Mexico more help fighting it's (our?) drug war, stop investing in the ethanol fiasco, increase military spending to spur the economy (our stuff is getting worn out from our adventures in the Mideast), just for starters. I'd go on a "date night" to Hollywood park while it's still around.

Danzig · #**171** 06-13-2009, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.

SOREHOOF · #**172** 06-13-2009, 11:47 AM

If fossil records can prove evolution why can't they prove the planet has been warming and cooling on it's own? Sometimes catastrophically. I guess it depends who is trying to prove what.

Riot · #**173** 06-13-2009, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

If fossil records can prove evolution why can't they prove the planet has been warming and cooling on it's own? Sometimes catastrophically. I guess it depends who is trying to prove what.

Um ... they have

The important question (that has been answered) is how does this period of warming differ from the past?

#**174** 06-13-2009, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.

Jesus is there a liberal that actually ever responds without resorting to techincalities?

whoopsadiddle...

SOREHOOF · #**175** 06-14-2009, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Um ... they have

The important question (that has been answered) is how does this period of warming differ from the past?

How does it differ? Who answered,Al Gore? What was the answer?

Riot · #**176** 06-14-2009, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

How does it differ? Who answered,Al Gore? What was the answer?

Whoosh .....

dellinger63 · #**177** 06-14-2009, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Um ... they have

The important question (that has been answered) is how does this period of warming differ from the past?

This period of warming includes setting records for being cold

The cloudy, chilly and rainy open to June here has been the talk of the town. So far this June is running more than 12 degrees cooler than last year, and the clouds, rain and chilly lake winds have been persistent. The average temperature at O'Hare International Airport through Friday has been only 59.5 degrees: nearly 7 degrees below normal and the coldest since records there began 50 years ago.

http://weblogs.wgntv.com/chicago-wea...one-for-2.html
__________________

Riot · #**178** 06-14-2009, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

This period of warming includes setting records for being cold

Whoosh ...

dellinger63 · #**179** 06-14-2009, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

Whoosh ...

Let's see how cold we can get!!!!

dellinger63 · #**180** 06-14-2009, 09:38 AM

also noticed on 'Most Dangerous Catch' one of my favs, that the captains were reporting never seeing ice so far south like they did this past winter but what do they know? No lab coats you know.....