|
|
 |
|
#1
02-24-2015, 10:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Knowledge Ins't Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/23/op...ore-ipad-share
Knowledge Isn’t Power FEB. 23, 2015 Paul Krugman Regular readers know that I sometimes mock “very serious people” — politicians and pundits who solemnly repeat conventional wisdom that sounds tough-minded and realistic. The trouble is that sounding serious and being serious are by no means the same thing, and some of those seemingly tough-minded positions are actually ways to dodge the truly hard issues. The prime example of recent years was, of course, Bowles-Simpsonism — the diversion of elite discourse away from the ongoing tragedy of high unemployment and into the supposedly crucial issue of how, exactly, we will pay for social insurance programs a couple of decades from now. That particular obsession, I’m happy to say, seems to be on the wane. But my sense is that there’s a new form of issue-dodging packaged as seriousness on the rise. This time, the evasion involves trying to divert our national discourse about inequality into a discussion of alleged problems with education. And the reason this is an evasion is that whatever serious people may want to believe, soaring inequality isn’t about education; it’s about power. Just to be clear: I’m in favor of better education. Education is a friend of mine. And it should be available and affordable for all. But what I keep seeing is people insisting that educational failings are at the root of still-weak job creation, stagnating wages and rising inequality. This sounds serious and thoughtful. But it’s actually a view very much at odds with the evidence, not to mention a way to hide from the real, unavoidably partisan debate. The education-centric story of our problems runs like this: We live in a period of unprecedented technological change, and too many American workers lack the skills to cope with that change. This “skills gap” is holding back growth, because businesses can’t find the workers they need. It also feeds inequality, as wages soar for workers with the right skills but stagnate or decline for the less educated. So what we need is more and better education. My guess is that this sounds familiar — it’s what you hear from the talking heads on Sunday morning TV, in opinion articles from business leaders like Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, in “framing papers” from the Brookings Institution’s centrist Hamilton Project. It’s repeated so widely that many people probably assume it’s unquestionably true. But it isn’t. For one thing, is the pace of technological change really that fast? “We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters,” the venture capitalist Peter Thiel has snarked. Productivity growth, which surged briefly after 1995, seems to have slowed sharply. Furthermore, there’s no evidence that a skills gap is holding back employment. After all, if businesses were desperate for workers with certain skills, they would presumably be offering premium wages to attract such workers. So where are these fortunate professions? You can find some examples here and there. Interestingly, some of the biggest recent wage gains are for skilled manual labor — sewing machine operators, boilermakers — as some manufacturing production moves back to America. But the notion that highly skilled workers are generally in demand is just false. Finally, while the education/inequality story may once have seemed plausible, it hasn’t tracked reality for a long time. “The wages of the highest-skilled and highest-paid individuals have continued to increase steadily,” the Hamilton Project says. Actually, the inflation-adjusted earnings of highly educated Americans have gone nowhere since the late 1990s. So what is really going on? Corporate profits have soared as a share of national income, but there is no sign of a rise in the rate of return on investment. How is that possible? Well, it’s what you would expect if rising profits reflect monopoly power rather than returns to capital. As for wages and salaries, never mind college degrees — all the big gains are going to a tiny group of individuals holding strategic positions in corporate suites or astride the crossroads of finance. Rising inequality isn’t about who has the knowledge; it’s about who has the power. Now, there’s a lot we could do to redress this inequality of power. We could levy higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, and invest the proceeds in programs that help working families. We could raise the minimum wage and make it easier for workers to organize. It’s not hard to imagine a truly serious effort to make America less unequal. But given the determination of one major party to move policy in exactly the opposite direction, advocating such an effort makes you sound partisan. Hence the desire to see the whole thing as an education problem instead. But we should recognize that popular evasion for what it is: a deeply unserious fantasy. 
|
|
#3
02-24-2015, 07:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
|
|
#4
03-02-2015, 08:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Knowledge may not mean power but in many cases, it means a job. A good paying IT job. Who cares that there aren't enough qualified US citizens to fill them and we import workers from India even if we're paying them with tax dollars. The rich have too much money anyway and they're the ones really paying them. I'm sure the Indian workers will at least spend most of it here before returning home to meet the woman their parents have chose for them to spend the rest of their life with.
http://www.news10.net/story/news/inv...jobs/22603549/
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#5
03-02-2015, 08:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
03-02-2015, 08:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
03-02-2015, 09:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Surely the State of California is insuring the above requirement is met. Especially since Obama travelled to India last year and discussed the program with Indian leaders.  The irony of employing people belonging to a caste system (where your family's surname decides whether or not you go to University or dress as a woman and suck dick) goes completely unnoticed or more likely ignored on purpose. BTW the EB-5 Visa program enacted by Bill Clinton during his last year in office has worked, if 'working' means half of all U.S. motels are now owned by Indians (well not Indians but Indians from state of Gujarat) again because of the caste system. I suppose it would be very difficult to stop either program now since we are a country with a open door immigration policy. Part of the never ending atonement we seek for allowing slavery 150 years ago.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#8
03-02-2015, 09:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
03-02-2015, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The ease of hiring H-1B workers certainly hasn't helped. More than 80 percent of H-1B visa holders are approved to be hired at wages below those paid to American-born workers for comparable positions, according to EPI. Experts who track labor conditions in the technology sector say that older, more expensive workers are particularly vulnerable to being undercut by their foreign counterparts. "You can be an exact match and never even get a phone call because you are too expensive," says Norman Matloff, a computer science professor at the University of California-Davis. "The minute that they see you've got 10 or 15 years of experience, they don't want you."
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln
|
Linear Mode
