Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2016, 11:46 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default Apple vs the fbi

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/16/us/san...r-phone-apple/
Im sure everyone has seen the story by now. What are your thoughts on this?

On the one hand, i want to know what is on tharlt terrorists phone. On the other.....we know we cannot trust that it is only this one time.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2016, 01:30 AM
Alabama Stakes Alabama Stakes is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: suffolk downs
Posts: 5,811
Default

Open a can of worms like that that for what might be there ? Time to get real . You want info fbi ? Figure it out yourself for a change
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2016, 08:40 AM
casp0555's Avatar
casp0555 casp0555 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Humble,Texas
Posts: 18,893
Default

I am more worried what someone else or some other group will do once that tech gets into their hands......thanks Apple for looking out for your customers, keep up the fight
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say, fools talk because they have to say something" - Plato
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2016, 08:57 AM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

A lot of that information Phone call log and Emails are on servers and not on the physical phone. It is routine that these are provided to law enforcement when subpoenaed. I was in that space awhile ago and was tasked with providing that information quite a few times. Seems like it is Text messages that are the question here

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393887,00.asp
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:29 PM
casp0555's Avatar
casp0555 casp0555 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Humble,Texas
Posts: 18,893
Default

I just dont agree with our Federal Investigators asking a business to develop a tool to circumvent the security feature designed for the phone to prevent this from occurring in the first place

Apple is not being asked to unlock an iPhone; it’s being asked to create software that would help the FBI unlock it. After which, there’s every reason to expect Apple and every other tech company will be asked to create more software that could be used to diminish even more civil liberties.

http://www.wired.com/2016/02/apple-f...vacy-security/

what's next?...and who knows the answer to that?
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say, fools talk because they have to say something" - Plato
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2016, 02:56 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by casp0555 View Post
I just dont agree with our Federal Investigators asking a business to develop a tool to circumvent the security feature designed for the phone to prevent this from occurring in the first place

Apple is not being asked to unlock an iPhone; it’s being asked to create software that would help the FBI unlock it. After which, there’s every reason to expect Apple and every other tech company will be asked to create more software that could be used to diminish even more civil liberties.

http://www.wired.com/2016/02/apple-f...vacy-security/

what's next?...and who knows the answer to that?
I guessed it depends what Apple is being asked to do. If they are simply being asked to unlock this iPhone, and this iPhone only, they should do it. But they should not be forced to come up with some new system that would allow law enforcement to open up everyone's phone.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2016, 06:51 AM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
I guessed it depends what Apple is being asked to do. If they are simply being asked to unlock this iPhone, and this iPhone only, they should do it. But they should not be forced to come up with some new system that would allow law enforcement to open up everyone's phone.
They should treat this like any other request for information by law enforcement. Require them to go through the process of obtaining warrants and supeonas for the device. Present them to Apple and have Apple unlock the individual device and reset password and hand over the device. Apple most certainly should be compensated for this new line of business. In no way should they develop something that law enforcement can use on their own.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:05 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
I guessed it depends what Apple is being asked to do. If they are simply being asked to unlock this iPhone, and this iPhone only, they should do it. But they should not be forced to come up with some new system that would allow law enforcement to open up everyone's phone.
they aren't asking that.
and at last count, it's about 175 phones now that the fbi and other departments want opened.
and the latter is exactly what they're being asked to do. create a program, that can be used by law enforcement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62 View Post
They should treat this like any other request for information by law enforcement. Require them to go through the process of obtaining warrants and supeonas for the device. Present them to Apple and have Apple unlock the individual device and reset password and hand over the device. Apple most certainly should be compensated for this new line of business. In no way should they develop something that law enforcement can use on their own.
agree completely
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-29-2016, 01:24 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62 View Post
They should treat this like any other request for information by law enforcement. Require them to go through the process of obtaining warrants and supeonas for the device. Present them to Apple and have Apple unlock the individual device and reset password and hand over the device. Apple most certainly should be compensated for this new line of business. In no way should they develop something that law enforcement can use on their own.
I agree 100%.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.