Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2010, 01:22 AM
richard burch's Avatar
richard burch richard burch is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,751
Default N.J. Racing News

Whelan: End Casinos' $30M Subsidy Of Horse Tracks
WAYNE PARRY, Associated Press Writer

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) ― The bad blood between New Jersey's horse racing tracks and its casinos escalated Tuesday when two state senators who support the casinos proposed ending the $30 million annual subsidy that the casinos provide to help keep the tracks alive.

Sen. James Whelan, a former mayor of Atlantic City, said the subsidy should end, even if it means the end of horse racing in New Jersey.

"That's what happens in a capitalist society," said Whelan, a Democrat from Atlantic County. "If there's no demand for a product, why should we as an industry and as a society feel obligated to prop it up?"

Whelan made his comments during the opening remarks at the East Coast Gaming Congress, a casino industry gathering in Atlantic City.

Later in the day, state Senate President Stephen Sweeney echoed those comments.

"There's a commitment in New jersey not to tear this place apart," Sweeney said. "Race tracks have to be able to stand on their own. The casinos have made an enormous investment here, billions and billions of dollars.

"I don't think casinos should be spending $30 million on horse racing," he said. "They should be spending it on promoting casinos."

In recent years, race tracks and casinos have been fighting each other for a dwindling pot of money from gamblers. The tracks say they can't survive without a subsidy from the nearly $4 billion Atlantic City casino industry, and also want the right to install slot machines at race tracks.

That's something the casinos adamantly oppose, and something Sweeney vowed not to allow a vote on.

Thomas F. Luchento, president of the Standardbred Breeders & Owners Association of New Jersey, blasted Whelan's proposal.

"What they want to do is to try and stomp out the horse racing business," he said. "As soon as we were done for, they'd move right up there. It's clear that if we weren't in their way, they would move in."

He said horse racing is a $1 billion-a-year industry in New Jersey.

"How can you turn down a $1 billion a year?" he asked. "I understand that the average guy in Newark doesn't care whether there is horse racing in New Jersey. But he does care that his property tax goes down."

Luchento said earlier this year that racing's share of state gambling tax revenue in New Jersey has decreased from 81 percent to 1 percent since casinos were first allowed in 1978.

Casinos have subsidized New Jersey's tracks since 2004 to help them provide the same kind of purses now being offered in neighboring states by tracks equipped with racinos, an industry term combining racing and casinos, to describe a race track that has slot machines. The higher purses are needed to attract the best horses and jockeys.

The total amount of the subsidy through 2011 is estimated at $176 million.

The racing industry has about 2,050 employees and generates about $31 million in annual state and local taxes, according to a 2007 study by Rutgers University.

Whelan said he is waiting for the recommendations of a panel appointed by Gov. Chris Christie to study the state's gambling industry. A spokesman for the governor said the report is due at the end of June.

"Until then, legislation aimed at protecting turf seems a bit premature," he said. "Our goal is to come up with a comprehensive approach that considers the future use of all of New Jersey's entertainment assets."
__________________
Support your local Re-run or horse rescue organization.
https://www.rerunottb.com/:)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2010, 09:20 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

If the casinos ball long term hard ball there will be slots at Meadowlands and Monmouth in 20 minutes. They can't afford that they will ultimately make a deal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2010, 09:27 AM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
If the casinos ball long term hard ball there will be slots at Meadowlands and Monmouth in 20 minutes. They can't afford that they will ultimately make a deal.
I hope you are right but the casino's own Trenton.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2010, 09:14 AM
GoIrish's Avatar
GoIrish GoIrish is offline
Morris Park
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Red Bank, NJ
Posts: 137
Default

Personally I'd like to see the casinos go out of business. I used to be a 3-4 times a month casino player (10+ years ago), but they slowly made it a very aggravating and expensive experience. Two years ago I swore I'd never spend another cent in AC and I haven't. When all you can find is $15 and $25 tables (empty I might add) on a Wednesday night I knew it was over. They blame everyone and everything but themselves. Smoking ban? Please, what a joke. Maybe if they didn't cater to a bunch of fake high rollers who all lost their financial jobs other people would still go there. 100% of my gambling dollars now go to horse racing and I'm quite pleased about it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2010, 09:47 AM
Travis Stone's Avatar
Travis Stone Travis Stone is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoIrish View Post
Personally I'd like to see the casinos go out of business. I used to be a 3-4 times a month casino player (10+ years ago), but they slowly made it a very aggravating and expensive experience. Two years ago I swore I'd never spend another cent in AC and I haven't. When all you can find is $15 and $25 tables (empty I might add) on a Wednesday night I knew it was over. They blame everyone and everything but themselves. Smoking ban? Please, what a joke. Maybe if they didn't cater to a bunch of fake high rollers who all lost their financial jobs other people would still go there. 100% of my gambling dollars now go to horse racing and I'm quite pleased about it.
Smoking bans do impact casino gaming big time. Upwards of 20% direct impact to business. I know this because Louisiana was recently about to pass a similar ban, but it was nixed.

As for the rest... at what point will the slot machine and physical table become a thing of the past and if you want to gamble, you'll do it online. It's possible now, although illegal, but not too long down the road it will become legalized.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2010, 09:53 AM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoIrish View Post
Personally I'd like to see the casinos go out of business. I used to be a 3-4 times a month casino player (10+ years ago), but they slowly made it a very aggravating and expensive experience. Two years ago I swore I'd never spend another cent in AC and I haven't. When all you can find is $15 and $25 tables (empty I might add) on a Wednesday night I knew it was over. They blame everyone and everything but themselves. Smoking ban? Please, what a joke. Maybe if they didn't cater to a bunch of fake high rollers who all lost their financial jobs other people would still go there. 100% of my gambling dollars now go to horse racing and I'm quite pleased about it.
I agree 100%. Horse racing now gets nearly all my wagering dollars as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.