#21
|
|||
|
|||
I was assuming that you could provide the explanation that wasn't provided in your earlier response. Sorry.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I honestly think you know the answer.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Where was applause requested?
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But let's be real... and like Steve, I'm pro gambler all the way... but I'm also in a unique spot where I can see the business from the other side. If horse racing said, "On Saturday, the nationwide takeout will be 10%" ... would handle be drastically affected? What about the visa-versa? Another question to think about... Should horse racing gamblers pay a "premium" for gambling on a game where logic/understanding/hard work can prevail over luck (roulette, for example) in the long run? Is that fair to say? Takeout is one of many issues facing horse racing... but having a quick slash in the takeout will not save the sport. It doesn't hurt, but it's not the Holy Grail some are painting it to be. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I like Frank's idea of a mega "powerball" horse racing lottery . The pols have cut deeply into horse racing handle with their own lotteries . We'll see if they want to give us a chance in that arena . If so , it would increase handle and might afford an opportunity to lower takeout on existing wagers . I think handle has to go up before takeout goes down .
__________________
Tom Cooley photo |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|