Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:08 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

http://www.slate.com/id/2272262/pagenum/2



the last sentence is absolutely correct.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:16 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
I believe this is a pretty straight-forward question with a Yes (it is racist) or No (it is natural to feel nervous sometimes) answer.

Aaaannnnyyyway we can get an answer? Prove to us doubters that you can tackle a tough topic! (not that this is a tough topic or anything)

If you answer honestly I'll give you a bonus prize!!
She's not going to answer a question that will undermine her position. It's that simple. And yet she can't figure out why everyone gives her a hard time.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:16 PM
Rileyoriley's Avatar
Rileyoriley Rileyoriley is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Snowy Woods
Posts: 4,484
Default

Both my conscious and unconscious mind would rather fly with thugs and muslims than Riot.
__________________
Hillary Clinton 2016: The "Extremely Careless" Leadership America Needs!
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:22 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
http://www.slate.com/id/2272262/pagenum/2



the last sentence is absolutely correct.
Let's do an experiment and see if any one group committs more crime than another. Let's check out the most wanted criminals in Los Angeles:

http://www.lapdonline.org/all_most_wanted

Do a good inspection of the list. It's beyond what even the most racially biased person would ever imagine in their wildest dreams.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:26 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin View Post
She's not going to answer a question that will undermine her position. It's that simple. And yet she can't figure out why everyone gives her a hard time.
You had a complete, multi-post argument with yourself discussing what you imagined I thought or said. I wasn't even involved <vbg>

You're really in no position to throw any stones about someone elses "position"
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:30 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
You had a complete, multi-post argument with yourself discussing what you imagined I thought or said. I wasn't even involved <vbg>

You're really in no position to throw any stones about someone elses "position"
You are quite a character, to say the least.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:38 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Here's a good comment from Dave Sirota at "Open Left"

Quote:
As Glenn Greenwald correctly notes, Williams was not just privately admitting his bigoted impulses, nor was he stating them publicly so as to say how they are wrong - he was acting on them by going on national TV and suggesting that they are AOK. Indeed, during the O'Reilly interview and afterwards in his FoxNews.com post, Williams endorses his own impulses - he doesn't really refute them.

That's right, Williams restated that publicly declaring his fear of Muslims - and further insisting that someone wearing any Muslim garb means they are automatically "identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims" (ie. potentially disloyal to America) - "is not a bigoted statement." And to cover himself, Williams then weakly insisted that "I made it clear that all Americans have to be careful not to let fears lead to the violation of anyone's constitutional rights."

Think of the message in that: According to Juan Williams, it's absolutely OK to be a racist, as long as you don't go the extra mile and try to violate someone's rights.

IMHO, it's not OK to be a bigot, even if you are not violating someone's rights. And to argue otherwise is to take natural bigoted impulses and legitimize them as OK.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:47 PM
clyde's Avatar
clyde clyde is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Welsh Pride!
Posts: 13,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
http://www.slate.com/id/2272262/pagenum/2



the last sentence is absolutely correct.
Danny...enough with the quoting of intellectual hypocracy.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:48 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
http://www.slate.com/id/2272262/pagenum/2



the last sentence is absolutely correct.
Good article.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:54 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

i thought it was. seemed a better attempt at the point rupert was trying to make with you, riot. and i'd wager everyone knew the answer, although you were far too reluctant to say what we all would know is the truth. hell, everyone knows you don't have to fear an 80 year old woman, unless she's driving!
it also made the point i was trying to make a few days back. voicing your thoughts or visceral reactions is being honest, not dishonest. now, acting out on irrational feelings is a whole different story. but like i said when this first came out, how can we have dialogue if people are afraid to speak? this thread illustrated that point, albeit a bit awkwardly.
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old 10-25-2010, 11:02 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
i thought it was. seemed a better attempt at the point rupert was trying to make with you, riot. and i'd wager everyone knew the answer, although you were far too reluctant to say what we all would know is the truth. hell, everyone knows you don't have to fear an 80 year old woman, unless she's driving!
it also made the point i was trying to make a few days back. voicing your thoughts or visceral reactions is being honest, not dishonest. now, acting out on irrational feelings is a whole different story. but like i said when this first came out, how can we have dialogue if people are afraid to speak? this thread illustrated that point, albeit a bit awkwardly.
Ruperts point was self-evident, but for a slightly different reason, matching what he posted about crime in LA. I agree with the article - blind obedience, without question as to why, to irrational fears isn't something to embrace.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 10-26-2010, 11:12 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

On Jon Stewart’s first night in the nation’s capital, he had to tackle last week’s firing of the NPR analyst Juan Williams.

Mr. Williams was fired after he said on Fox News that he felt fearful when he saw people in “Muslim garb” on an airplane.

Said Samantha Bee, one of the “Daily Show” correspondents: “It was a direct violation of NPR’s never-say-anything-interesting policy.”

Mr. Stewart latched onto the anti-NPR attitude that dominated Fox News programs in the days after Mr. Williams’s firing by NPR. (Fox immediately extended Mr. Williams’s contract. “NPR, you just brought a tote bag full of David Sedaris books to a knife fight,” Mr. Stewart said. Here’s the segment:

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2...n-williams/?hp
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 10-26-2010, 09:15 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35 View Post
Said Samantha Bee, one of the “Daily Show” correspondents: “It was a direct violation of NPR’s never-say-anything-interesting policy."
No kidding. Seeing some turn themselves inside-out calling NPR "left wing liberal" makes me think: have they ever even listened to NPR?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.