#1
|
||||
|
||||
WI Judges Sign Walker Recall Petitiion
In one of the most one-sided articles written, 29 Justices signed the petition.
In a rest of the story moment, 221 Judges did not. But why concentrate on the majority when there is a minority? BTW 100% of Appeals and Supreme Court Justices were not on the re-call petitions including the 'alleged' victim of Judge Prosser. Instead of re-calling Walker, the majority of Judges agree with the majority of WI citizens feeling Walker should be called not re-called and told to keep up the fine work. http://gazettextra.com/weblogs/lates...call-petition/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Did I miss something? Do Wisconsin Justices lose their right to vote when they become a judge?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
29 signed 221 did not sign Get it now? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Get what? That you are a victim?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, I think you calling the below article, reprinted here in it's short complete entirety, "one of the most one-sided articles written!" (gasp! horror!) - when it doesn't contain even one sentence of opinion - is pretty bat crazy.
Fear those imaginary demons of attack and paranoid persecution much? Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Isn't the 221 who didn't sign a bigger story than the 29 that did? I guess the story is just poorly written? |