Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2006, 06:57 AM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default BC Juvenile - Top 3 finishers

Which one do you think will have the best 3yo year?
I know it is impossible to know.....and it is ridiculously early to speculate on something like that......but I find these horses more interesting than many top BC juvies in the past (and therefore more worthy of this sort of premature discussion) for a couple reasons.
1) It seems like a lot of the time a good 2yo runs the entire year and we never figure out if he can run behind other horses. Not the case here, they have all proved they can do that.
2) Pedigree - All 3 are by sires who were serious 10f horses (street cry - thunder gulch - aptitude) and none of those horses did their best running at 2.
3) None of them regressed in their 2yo season. All three seemed to keep improving over the course of the year.
I suppose the biggest question mark is Great Hunter since his only big win came on the poly, but he was solid if not spectacular on the dirt, and I think most Aptitudes tend to be late bloomers like their old man.
But that being said.....my pick is still Quay.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:12 AM
cakes44's Avatar
cakes44 cakes44 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,746
Default

Where did the top 3 finishers run their final preps? On polytrack? No way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:14 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miraja2
Which one do you think will have the best 3yo year?
I know it is impossible to know.....and it is ridiculously early to speculate on something like that......but I find these horses more interesting than many top BC juvies in the past (and therefore more worthy of this sort of premature discussion) for a couple reasons.
1) It seems like a lot of the time a good 2yo runs the entire year and we never figure out if he can run behind other horses. Not the case here, they have all proved they can do that.
2) Pedigree - All 3 are by sires who were serious 10f horses (street cry - thunder gulch - aptitude) and none of those horses did their best running at 2.
3) None of them regressed in their 2yo season. All three seemed to keep improving over the course of the year.
I suppose the biggest question mark is Great Hunter since his only big win came on the poly, but he was solid if not spectacular on the dirt, and I think most Aptitudes tend to be late bloomers like their old man.



But that being said.....my pick is still Quay.


Dude its so hard to say how much that ridiculous scraped inside benefitted the winner as compared to CQ who was moving at the same time yet forced to go to the parking lot while the winner slid through inside.
My guess is that they are a LOT closer in ability than 10 lengths, LOL!.
But I feel both are better than Hunter.
I wish someday CD would learn to leave the track alone on big race days, they don't get it and never will, and two more horses were injured on that pavement.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:21 AM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
I wish someday CD would learn to leave the track alone on big race days, they don't get it and never will, and two more horses were injured on that pavement.
CD is not alone in this. I absolutely hate when tracks do this.

I assume they're hoping for a track record or two to fall to further hype the event. But what it ends up doing is ruining very nice horses and making handicapping the races a joke.

I could care less what the final time is. Give us a fair track and let the best horse win.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:30 AM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cakes44
Where did the top 3 finishers run their final preps? On polytrack? No way.
I don't understand what you mean by this.
I am no polyfan, but what does the fact that they ran their final prep on polytrack have to do with how well they will do at three?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:32 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cakes44
Where did the top 3 finishers run their final preps? On polytrack? No way.
Yeah in a race with COMPLETELY different form than this one, LOL!!! Some correlation there huh?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:33 AM
cakes44's Avatar
cakes44 cakes44 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,746
Default

Just thought it was interesting. I think Great Hunter is a nice 3-year-old prospect. I don't think CQ will get much better, and I really don't know a whole lot about Street Sense's breeding to be honest.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:36 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cakes44
Just thought it was interesting. I think Great Hunter is a nice 3-year-old prospect. I don't think CQ will get much better, and I really don't know a whole lot about Street Sense's breeding to be honest.
Street Sense is still an enigma to me. To explode like that, even with the aid of a ridiculously strong bias, was incredible.
I think hes a fascinating horse, and really wanna see him run again.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:40 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,936
Default

Anyone that actually knows HOW to watch races knows that Street Sense was MUCH the best in the Breeder's Futurity at Keeneland. This was discussed at length on this board after that race by, at least, Eurobounce and myself. That may not translate to his domination Saturday but he was certainly at least four lengths better than Circular Quay at Keeneland.

His win was no surprise to actual trip handicappers.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2006, 07:43 AM
jpops757 jpops757 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Garland tx [Dallas area]
Posts: 1,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Dude its so hard to say how much that ridiculous scraped inside benefitted the winner as compared to CQ who was moving at the same time yet forced to go to the parking lot while the winner slid through inside.
My guess is that they are a LOT closer in ability than 10 lengths, LOL!.
But I feel both are better than Hunter.
I wish someday CD would learn to leave the track alone on big race days, they don't get it and never will, and two more horses were injured on that pavement.
I maintain that the winner was the best horse Sat just happened to take the shortcut and have lots of luck to get through a fast closing hole. If I had to pick a winner from the juvi it would be CQ.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-07-2006, 08:07 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Anyone that actually knows HOW to watch races knows that Street Sense was MUCH the best in the Breeder's Futurity at Keeneland. This was discussed at length on this board after that race by, at least, Eurobounce and myself. That may not translate to his domination Saturday but he was certainly at least four lengths better than Circular Quay at Keeneland.

His win was no surprise to actual trip handicappers.
Thats assuming an exact translation to dirt from Poly. A big assumption. And i freely admitted after the Futurity that Street Sense was the best in that race. I thought his grass breeding was a factor in that poly race. Apparently he was just blossoming. Bias or no bias, he was tons the best and gets the props.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-07-2006, 08:10 AM
Buffymommy's Avatar
Buffymommy Buffymommy is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In a little world all my own...
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cakes44
Just thought it was interesting. I think Great Hunter is a nice 3-year-old prospect. I don't think CQ will get much better, and I really don't know a whole lot about Street Sense's breeding to be honest.

I am definately keeping an eye on Great Hunter. I want to see if he can move forward from his two year old campaign.
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2006, 08:22 AM
lemoncrush's Avatar
lemoncrush lemoncrush is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 1,408
Default

I think we'll see all 3 of these line up (barring injury) on the first Saturday in May. All 3 are models of consistency, and have a chance to get better.

The real question is, which horses in the rest of the field will improve to be a factor in the road to the derby next spring? Judging from the past few years, there probably won't be more than 2 or 3 from the juvy race that even make it to the big dance.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2006, 09:22 AM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Dude its so hard to say how much that ridiculous scraped inside benefitted the winner as compared to CQ who was moving at the same time yet forced to go to the parking lot while the winner slid through inside.
My guess is that they are a LOT closer in ability than 10 lengths, LOL!.
But I feel both are better than Hunter.
I wish someday CD would learn to leave the track alone on big race days, they don't get it and never will, and two more horses were injured on that pavement.
Hey Oracle--question for you---it seems to me that Quay seems to find trouble during a race. Albeit not serious trouble but just enough to cause a little disturbance in his running. Do you think he is one of those horses that finds trouble instead of being able to stay out of it for a clear run.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2006, 09:26 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
Hey Oracle--question for you---it seems to me that Quay seems to find trouble during a race. Albeit not serious trouble but just enough to cause a little disturbance in his running. Do you think he is one of those horses that finds trouble instead of being able to stay out of it for a clear run.
I think the trouble was that the inside part of the track resembled a paved highway and he was moving in tandem with SS and got spun 9 wide and had to run sideways while the winner got the incredible clean rail run notonly saving every inch of ground but doing so on the "yellow brick road" as he did so.
Not gonna say the outcome would have been different with reversed trips because the winner ran incredibly.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:01 AM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

The only trouble Circular Quay ran into was a far better horse.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:08 AM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
I think the trouble was that the inside part of the track resembled a paved highway.
i still don't see it. i didn't notice it on saturday and even after hearing all the screaming i don't see it.

horses won off the rail, and horses that were "supposed" to win wilted on the rail. i contend that it was a much larger issue of pace in the races and better horses winning (which i confirm over and over the more i watch the races) than it was any sort of inside golden path home.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:14 AM
jpops757 jpops757 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Garland tx [Dallas area]
Posts: 1,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
I think the trouble was that the inside part of the track resembled a paved highway and he was moving in tandem with SS and got spun 9 wide and had to run sideways while the winner got the incredible clean rail run notonly saving every inch of ground but doing so on the "yellow brick road" as he did so.
Not gonna say the outcome would have been different with reversed trips because the winner ran incredibly.
I agree with Ora with the exceptio, if Calvin was 1/2 a jump slower getting to the inside hole he would have been ccut off and we probably wouldent even be talking about Streey Sense and possiblytalking about the crappy ride Calvin gave.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2006, 12:45 PM
LARHAGE's Avatar
LARHAGE LARHAGE is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miraja2
Which one do you think will have the best 3yo year?
I know it is impossible to know.....and it is ridiculously early to speculate on something like that......but I find these horses more interesting than many top BC juvies in the past (and therefore more worthy of this sort of premature discussion) for a couple reasons.
1) It seems like a lot of the time a good 2yo runs the entire year and we never figure out if he can run behind other horses. Not the case here, they have all proved they can do that.
2) Pedigree - All 3 are by sires who were serious 10f horses (street cry - thunder gulch - aptitude) and none of those horses did their best running at 2.
3) None of them regressed in their 2yo season. All three seemed to keep improving over the course of the year.
I suppose the biggest question mark is Great Hunter since his only big win came on the poly, but he was solid if not spectacular on the dirt, and I think most Aptitudes tend to be late bloomers like their old man.
But that being said.....my pick is still Quay.
I like Street Sense, I don't like horses that have to have things go perfectly in order to win, Circular Quay lags too far behind, Great Hunter is a plodder. I like the way Street Sense just quickened in a heart beat and blew away the field, he has a very nice way of going, seems tractible and I really liked Street Cry. I also would much rather see Carl Nafzger with a nice, exciting 2 year old than Todd Ho-Hum Pletcher and Coolmore.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2006, 12:57 PM
avance2000 avance2000 is offline
Tropical Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer
i still don't see it. i didn't notice it on saturday and even after hearing all the screaming i don't see it.
in the first 4 bc races run on dirt....horses breaking from post 1 were 4 for 4.
you didn't notice that? and now you still don't see that? um.........okay.
__________________
the great avance has spoken.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.