#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The 45.16 half he set yesterday is maybe the fastest I've ever seen there. I'd have to think with as slow as the track was yesterday that would be a +30... and he still won relatively easily. He's a serious sprinter.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for sharing your analysis. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I have the race as 90-91-82. The 10th race, also at 6f, was 85-82-84.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Can you recap how the current figures relate to maybe what pars would be. A good Grade 1/2 sprinter on the front end, I think 90 ish is pretty solid, anything close to 100 would be blazing? On the other end of the scales anything around 80 would be considered well below par of that type of animal?
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
A 90 is around par for older, G1 males. Keep in mind that is at the finish. Also, a 90 at 1/4 mile in a 6f race is running faster than a 90 at 1/4 mile in a 7f race, and even faster than a 90 at 1/4 mile in a 9f race.
The pace figures are meant to relate how the fractions compare to the final time, not so much for comparing who is faster on different surfaces and at different distances. I have different tools for that. Of course on the same surface/distance, they can certainly be used as a means of comparison. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Billy |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
TG gave Friday a dead rail for Pimlico, and I'm guessing they will also do that for Saturday. I thought you wanted to be in the 4-5 path on the dirt, and on the lead or close on the lawn.
|