Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2013, 12:01 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default why repubs can't gain

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor...all_women.html


you'd think with the current mess with obamacare, the economy, etc, that dems would be in trouble in upcoming elections.
but no.
repubs get given gifts, but all they can do is this kind of stuff?
keep it up, repubs, i won't vote for you as long as your number one issue is my lady parts.

you'd think neocons would be all for bc, since they don't like abortion. no pregnancy, no abortion and all that...
but no.
they want no sex. except if you're married-and i guess they ignore the fact that most married couples use bc!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2013, 12:15 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

isn't $15 a month a lot less expensive than the cost of feeding, clothing, etc, a child each month?

well, yes, yes, it is.

cost to raise a child to age 18:

http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/14/pf/cost-children/

over 241k.
that's almost 1200 per month.

you do the math.

you'd think neocons, who detest abortion, detest welfare, would be all for preventing abortions, and people having kids and raising the cost of welfare.

no, they just want no sex. unless you're having sex with them of course.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2013, 12:29 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

of course, the above is only the cost of one child. that doesn't include the cost of prenatal care, delivery and post delivery care.
yep, makes sense, we shouldn't make bc affordable, or have easier access.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2013, 01:33 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
isn't $15 a month a lot less expensive than the cost of feeding, clothing, etc, a child each month?.
Too bad some are too ignorant or too 'entitled' to figure that out and pay out of pocket. Before say cable and taxi rides.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
you'd think neocons, who detest abortion, detest welfare, would be all for preventing abortions, and people having kids and raising the cost of welfare.
Imagine being one who does not detest abortion and presented a case of paying for an abortion or raising a kid not only doesn't detest but insists!

And I'm all for individual rights including gay marriage and all the benefits it may or may not entail, religious or no religion rights, meat or no meat, conservation and oil exploration, guns and gun penalties, abortion and the death penalty. One Rule: YOU PAY FOR YOUR OWN SHIAT!

I'm an American w/o a party and w/o even the hope of true representation.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2013, 01:44 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63 View Post
Too bad some are too ignorant or too 'entitled' to figure that out and pay out of pocket. Before say cable and taxi rides.




Imagine being one who does not detest abortion and presented a case of paying for an abortion or raising a kid not only doesn't detest but insists!

And I'm all for individual rights including gay marriage and all the benefits it may or may not entail, religious or no religion rights, meat or no meat, conservation and oil exploration, guns and gun penalties, abortion and the death penalty. One Rule: YOU PAY FOR YOUR OWN SHIAT!

I'm an American w/o a party and w/o even the hope of true representation.
I agree with you with the exception of social safety net. If we had none the cost of security, prisons for the social unrest we would face would far far outweigh the money spent on the social programs.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.