#1
|
|||
|
|||
Clippers Will Bring $2 Billion
The Clippers were valued at around $600 million just a year ago. Now it looks like the sale price will end up being around $2 billion.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/break...194651227.html |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.forbes.com/nfl-valuations/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozan...t-2-5-billion/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
$1.2 Billion
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
1.5-1.8
Dre-eminem-50 cent-ice cube buy the clippers |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Clippas With Attitude
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The $2 billion figure could be a little high but I think it will be in that ballpark. It could end up being more in the $1.7-$1.8 billion range. The price is obviously always higher when you have a bidding war (just like at the horse sales). |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Owners NEVER lose money on pro sports franchises. Whatever they pay won't really matter because teams always appreciate in value.
Kind of makes you think the players union got played during the last lockout when so many owners were crying that they were losing money. The Bucks sold for $550,000,000 with a decrepit arena, no stars in the countries 39th largest market. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
$2 Billion pending approval
http://nypost.com/2014/05/29/steve-b...for-2-billion/ What does this make the Yankees or Cowboys worth? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In L.A., Time Warner paid $7 billion for 25 years of rights to broadcast the Dodgers. They have, so far, been unable to resell the network they created to carry the games to any other provider. They are allegedly asking about $4/subscriber. They probably need close to that to reach break even on the deal they signed. Absent a deal, most of L.A. can't watch the Dodgers. If your local bar isn't in an area served by Time Warner, you can't go there to watch either. Dodger ownership gets their sack if cash regardless but they have to think about what happens to a fan base that can't watch any games outside the stadium. And Time Warner may become the cautionary tale for other networks if they wind up taking a loss. The Clippers current TV contract expires in 2016. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Don't forget that almost ALWAYS franchise ownership brings with it lucrative real estate deals. Gretzyky made millions owning (partially) the Coyotes from the development around the new arena, all while the team stunk up the NHL and bemoaned to the league how much money they were losing. Most owners are in the game solely for the real estate development opportunities and kickbacks. In many cases it behooves them to have the team lose money. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I have a conspiracy theory here. The only way to get Sterling out without a lawauit is to grossly overpay him so he goes quietly. I honestly believe that the NBA told Balmer to come up with a billion/billion and a half and they'll kick in the rest under the table just to rid themselves of Sterling.
I want to believe even though he has more money than God, guys like that just don't arbitrarily throw money around like that cause they could.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What are the Clippers truly worth? According to this analysis about $1.2-$1.6 billion.
http://news.yahoo.com/l-clippers-rea...7550--spt.html |