10/8 (KEE): Phoenix S. (G3), Darley Alcibiades S. (G1)

Originally Posted by Dahoss

The point is, you were wrong also, right? Don't you generally have to be right in order to pat yourself on the back? If anyone could, it would be CP, who was dead on with her odds.

Now I've really got sand in my vagina.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Now I've really got sand in my vagina.

I meant her as in the horse.

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I meant her as in the horse.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by philcski

Yes Phil, congratulations, I was wrong about her being 7:2. However, here's the difference....and it's a big one....I didn't run to the board a few minutes after the race was over to act like an ******* ( as you did ) and correct you for your equally horrible call.

Now, before you whine ( as you did in your deleted post yesterday ), remember....you were the jerk here.....not me.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Yes Phil, congratulations, I was wrong about her being 7:2. However, here's the difference....and it's a big one....I didn't run to the board a few minutes after the race was over to act like an ******* ( as you did ) and correct you for your equally horrible call.

Now, before you whine ( as you did in your deleted post yesterday ), remember....you were the jerk here.....not me.

I admit being a jerk by posting the eyeroll- but taking only semi-veiled shots both here and in another thread was acceptable on your part? When you're as vociferous as you were here you also have to accept the counterattacks. And the post that was deleted was far from whining- it was stating the truth.

Listen, you've had it out for me for 6 months. Why, I don't know. I'd love to bury the hatchet on whatever it is.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by philcski

I admit being a jerk by posting the eyeroll- but taking only semi-veiled shots both here and in another thread was acceptable on your part? When you're as vociferous as you were here you also have to accept the counterattacks. And the post that was deleted was far from whining- it was stating the truth.

Listen, you've had it out for me for 6 months. Why, I don't know. I'd love to bury the hatchet on whatever it is.

Phil, I don't mind kidding, in fact I enjoy it, but it's pretty clear that isn't what you are doing. Your ensuing paranoia confirms that.

You have assigned a great deal of importance to yourself with the rest of your claims. It is simply untrue. Disagreeing isn't personal regardless of how you have decided to interpret it.

But, don't worry....I'll leave you alone from now on. I didn't realize how fragile you were.

[hockey2315]

Does anybody know what the lowest winning GI Beyer in history is? We may have a new record.


69

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

Does anybody know what the lowest winning GI Beyer in history is? We may have a new record.


69

Wasn't the Frizette winner a few years ago in the 50s?

[hockey2315]

Sutra got a 68.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Phil, I don't mind kidding, in fact I enjoy it, but it's pretty clear that isn't what you are doing. Your ensuing paranoia confirms that.

You have assigned a great deal of importance to yourself with the rest of your claims. It is simply untrue. Disagreeing isn't personal regardless of how you have decided to interpret it.

But, don't worry....I'll leave you alone from now on. I didn't realize how fragile you were.

Paranoia? Assigning a great deal of importance to myself? Being fragile- are you for real? Are you sure you're not placing your feelings about yourself onto me? Your whole post makes no sense.

As for the initial disagreement of the thread, you stated your case and I stated mine. I certainly have no problem with that, in fact that's what the crux of a discussion board is. YOU decided to make it personal by making cracks here and in the other thread.

[Indian Charlie]

http://drf.com/news/wickedly-perfect...-cup-bone-chip