Belmont Stakes Field

[Gander]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Me too. I don't get him at all.

Me as well. Thought that race was set up on a tee for him sitting closest behind the speed freak Hello Broadway and getting first run on any closers, albeit there were no good closers in this race anyways. My contention is he probably would have still won this race but the margin and ease of victory were flattered by the set up. Imperial Council didnt exactly run the kind of race in the Met Mile that would have flattered Charitable Man.

I think there is a big chance Charitable Man goes off favored in the Belmont too.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Gander

Me as well. Thought that race was set up on a tee for him sitting closest behind the speed freak Hello Broadway and getting first run on any closers, albeit there were no good closers in this race anyways. My contention is he probably would have still won this race but the margin and ease of victory were flattered by the set up. Imperial Council didnt exactly run the kind of race in the Met Mile that would have flattered Charitable Man.

I think there is a big chance Charitable Man goes off favored in the Belmont too.

Assuming Rachel Alexandra doesn't run, Mine That Bird is a cinch to be favored in the Belmont.

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

How the hell do you figure his Peter Pan win sets him up to run a career best race? Is it the 3rd off a layoff that you really like?

I simply can't see how someone could take a perfect trip winner who had everything go his way and say in such a matter-of-fact way that he's gonna run an even better race in arguably the most grueling race in America.

NT

What's obvious to some is not obvious to others. And, here, it doesn't cost anything to be wrong.

Handicapping, a decidedly SOLO experience.

[LooseOnTheLead]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

How the hell do you figure his Peter Pan win sets him up to run a career best race? Is it the 3rd off a layoff that you really like?

I simply can't see how someone could take a perfect trip winner who had everything go his way and say in such a matter-of-fact way that he's gonna run an even better race in arguably the most grueling race in America.

NT

a modest improvement off his 2yo top in his second start signals a better top in his third and his style figures him to get another ideal trip any way you cut it.If i could bet he runs a new top i would bet w/ both hands.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

He's like that Quiet Chris, predicting, loudly, that Imperial Council would win the MET MILE (on that other forum).

I saw that too. Pretty funny stuff.

[Gander]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Assuming Rachel Alexandra doesn't run, Mine That Bird is a cinch to be favored in the Belmont.

Not including Rachael Alexandra, who most likely isnt running, I think Charitable Man and Mine that Bird will be very close in the wagering, both very close to 2/1. Then Dunkirk at around 7/2.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

Simple, Nick, he doesn't know any better.

He's like that other idiot, Quiet Chris, predicting, loudly, that Imperial Council would win the MET MILE (on that other forum).

What's obvious to some is not obvious to others. And, here, it doesn't cost anything to be wrong.

Handicapping, a decidedly SOLO experience.

The common thread is, of course, that Quiet Chris LOVES Charitable Man in the Belmont.

NT

[the_fat_man]

See, this is why I need to be paying for someone else's opinion/data.

By forking over my money, I also get to join a cool, sort of exclusive club that uses all these groovy words:

bounce
form cycle
new top

Groovy chickarooney. This is fine ****.

Rather than developing my skill in the game I would then be developing my skill in interpreting the opinion/information of someone else. And I'd have the privilege/pleasure of discussing someone else's ideas on his forum. And there'd even be historical precedence: the Neo Platonists or the Aristotelian apologists, for example. They did much to further the ideas of their master.

Why in the world would I want my own opinion?

[LooseOnTheLead]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

What's obvious to some is not obvious to others. And, here, it doesn't cost anything to be wrong.

Handicapping, a decidedly SOLO experience.

because of my respect and admiration for the host, i thought this site might be different and worhtwhile.Guess not.

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by LooseOnTheLead

because of my respect and admiration for the host, i thought this site might be different and worhtwhile.Guess not.

Another promising handicapping mind negatively influenced by the Fat Man.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by LooseOnTheLead

because of my respect and admiration for the host, i thought this site might be different and worhtwhile.Guess not.

This is not a place for the thin-skinned but if you stand by your opinions (which it seems like you do) then you should stay. However, don't be surprised if an opinion deduced almost entirely from the sheets is derided by non-sheet players.

NT

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by LooseOnTheLead

because of my respect and admiration for the host, i thought this site might be different and worhtwhile.Guess not.

So we should all agree with your opinion.....ya know.....out of respect for our host?

Just be sure you are checking back AFTER the Belmont, on the off chance that Charitable Man tanks.

[Gander]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

So we should all agree with your opinion.....ya know.....out of respect for our host?

Just be sure you are checking back AFTER the Belmont, on the off chance that Charitable Man tanks.

Andy- Who are you favoring at this point (not knowing of course the exact field)?

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Gander

Andy- Who are you favoring at this point (not knowing of course the exact field)?

Dunkirk seems OK to me.....as of now. Long way to go.

[Gander]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Dunkirk seems OK to me.....as of now. Long way to go.

Thanks, as of now thats who I am leaning towards, and I dont really see that changing all that much. I think he can win with or without a lively pace. Hoping that Rachael runs but I dont think she will.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

Another promising handicapping mind negatively influenced by the Fat Man.

you're the (fat) man!

[Bobby Fischer]

I like Charitable Man a little bit here. I know he got a perfect trip setting the pace behind that false pace in the Peter Pan, and according to trackus or the naked eye, he weakened in the drive of the Bluegrass by almost 2 1/2 lengths. If you want to use the polytrack to help guess about how he responds to stress, you have to balance his weak finish in the Bluegrass with coming into the race a little short, and the wide premature run to the first turn. Wasn't that bad considering.

sans Rachel, Charitable Man figures to be much the more talented forwardly placed runner, which can lead to the smooth trip he may need.

[colt 45ss]

mr hot stuff smokes 5f in 101 at keeneland
prado named to ride
makes his debut in the city that never sleeps on 6/3
all systems go
mr hot stuf

[VOL JACK]

Can someone tell me again, how do you put a poster on the iggy list??



Seriously!!!

[Bigsmc]

Originally Posted by VOL JACK

Can someone tell me again, how do you put a poster on the iggy list??



Seriously!!!

And miss out on internet gold??