Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:09 PM
whodey17's Avatar
whodey17 whodey17 is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: indy
Posts: 2,318
Default Turfway - Poly

I went to opening night last night and all I have to say is that this surface is worse now then it was last meet. I was encouraged by Poly at first, but now I am really starting to sour. It seems that Cushion is BY FAR better.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:25 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Outside of the two breakdowns, Tapeta has been fantastic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-2007, 12:00 AM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Outside of the two breakdowns, Tapeta has been fantastic.
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-2007, 12:12 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJP
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?
I hated it. I kept having to pass my kleenex to you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2007, 12:37 AM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

They have had months to come up with new excuses, lets see what they say when it starts freezing AGAIN
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-2007, 10:48 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whodey17
I went to opening night last night and all I have to say is that this surface is worse now then it was last meet. I was encouraged by Poly at first, but now I am really starting to sour. It seems that Cushion is BY FAR better.
What was it about the surface that you didnt like? Were you on it? Did you not like the way the races were playing out?

I am not a big poly proponent. I hated it last year but im starting to get use to it now. I do enjoy the fact that the fields are more full thus you get better value on the horses that you bet.

I played the card last night and it was abundantly clear that you pretty much had to throw out speed.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-2007, 10:57 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

This is from a very recent DRF article about Turfway:

Quote:
In fact, after having trouble with the surface "balling up" in horses' hooves last winter during freezing weather, Turfway decided recently to infuse the surface with an oil-based wax that Elliston said "addresses the stickiness issue." Although Turfway did not have problems with Polytrack at the 2005 or 2006 fall meets, when weather is not a major factor, "we wanted to go ahead and do this and see how it went," said Elliston.

The oil-based wax was tilled into the track over the course of several days, without disrupting training, about three weeks ago, said Elliston. The main ingredients of Polytrack include carpet fibers, recycled rubber bits, silica-coated sand, and polymer-based wax.

"The horsemen keep saying the surface is dynamite," said Elliston.
I imagine the horsemen that love the surface are those with a barn full of plodders. I think I'll stick to betting dirt (and turf) while these guys continue to tinker around with the surface at these wax tracks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:01 AM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
What was it about the surface that you didnt like? Were you on it? Did you not like the way the races were playing out?

I am not a big poly proponent. I hated it last year but im starting to get use to it now. I do enjoy the fact that the fields are more full thus you get better value on the horses that you bet.

I played the card last night and it was abundantly clear that you pretty much had to throw out speed.
It's nice to see a lot of horses running over a kinder surface.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:37 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitas
It's nice to see a lot of clydesdales plodding over a kinder surface.
FTFY.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:43 AM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
FTFY.
Clydesdales bring the beer so don't knock them.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-07-2007, 12:10 PM
whodey17's Avatar
whodey17 whodey17 is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: indy
Posts: 2,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
What was it about the surface that you didnt like? Were you on it? Did you not like the way the races were playing out?

I am not a big poly proponent. I hated it last year but im starting to get use to it now. I do enjoy the fact that the fields are more full thus you get better value on the horses that you bet.

I played the card last night and it was abundantly clear that you pretty much had to throw out speed.
Yes, I was on the track on Wednesday night. I also was on the track when they first installed Poly and the time between then and now. Although the track has been leveled, it is clear that the surface on Wednesday does not "break-up" as well as it did when it was first installed. The track is also slippery. What I mean by that is that it is hard for a horse to get a good grip on the surface. Big clumps of Poly, as well as dust, are now being kicked up by horses. I also dont think it has been playing as fair as it once did.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:40 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whodey17
Yes, I was on the track on Wednesday night. I also was on the track when they first installed Poly and the time between then and now. Although the track has been leveled, it is clear that the surface on Wednesday does not "break-up" as well as it did when it was first installed. The track is also slippery. What I mean by that is that it is hard for a horse to get a good grip on the surface. Big clumps of Poly, as well as dust, are now being kicked up by horses. I also dont think it has been playing as fair as it once did.
I appreciate the feedback. I don't know much about Poly outside of what I have read and watched on TV. I have not been to a track that had poly yet.

I would agree with the part about it playing fair. It seems like you have to have a truly superior animal in order to win on the lead.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:47 PM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

My "book" on it last meet was that the kickback was very bad and that the best place to be was near the lead and to the outside. It wasn't exactly speed favoring(well it was compared with Kee,Arl,Del Mar), but forwardly placed horses did well in routes, and also benefited from staying out of the cloud.
Now it sounds like they tinkered with the surface. Adding the oil-wax. Worth watching and observing for a while. Maybe this dampens speed. Have to observe the kickback as well.

Ky Cup is a pretty big race.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:02 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitas
It's nice to see a lot of horses running over a kinder surface.
but i read recently that supposedly there have been a lot more soft tissue injuries related to the poly surfaces.

anyone know if this is actually the case? trading one type of injury for another isn't a move in the right direction.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:09 PM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Trading injuries is not the goal, for sure. What is needed is quantifiable data and toward that end, breakdowns are way down at every track I believe.

Have a great weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:11 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sumitas
Trading injuries is not the goal, for sure. What is needed is quantifiable data and toward that end, breakdowns are way down at every track I believe.

Have a great weekend.
getting rid of breakdowns is obviously good, but not good for a horse who suffers an injury of another sort. of course, generally fans in attendance don't ever hear about those....keeps up the image of safety.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-07-2007, 11:54 PM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

As far as "hard" data, quantifiable, I think that will be slow to come. Plus, getting data on soft-tissue injuries is going to be tough, and to be able to attribute these injuries to the poly/synthetic/etc. surface is going to be extremely difficult if not impossible.

Any data on the new surfaces are going to come from a much smaller sampling and as such might be inconclusive. I am all for reducing breakdowns. I think we are seeing different "problems" (so called problems) at different tracks across the country. I still haven't seen the hard, quantifiable data where most (percentage) trainers dislike these surfaces. Sure, there are very vocal voices of displeasure, dislike, etc., but I am not sure if that is reflective of the majority or what size group.

Kickback, weather, moisture or lack thereof, and several other issues need, and will, be addressed. It's still very new, and there will be a lifecycle to it.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-08-2007, 12:18 AM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani

I would agree with the part about it playing fair. It seems like you have to have a truly superior animal in order to win on the lead.
That doesn't sound like a fair track to me; it sounds like a speed-killing track, which is not a fair track.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-08-2007, 12:41 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJP
That doesn't sound like a fair track to me; it sounds like a speed-killing track, which is not a fair track.
Arlington is the fairest synethic out there. Surprising that Arlington could do something right.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-08-2007, 02:31 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
As far as "hard" data, quantifiable, I think that will be slow to come. Plus, getting data on soft-tissue injuries is going to be tough, and to be able to attribute these injuries to the poly/synthetic/etc. surface is going to be extremely difficult if not impossible.
The current track study being conducted will give exactly that type of information.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.