![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The story keeps changing. Here was the news as of 4 days ago:
http://www.drf.com/news/article/94859.html The news today has totally changed: http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/45447.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() >>>“I’m recommending removing the surface and putting in a brand new base,” he said. “The options (for replacement) would be a porous asphalt base or a specialized grid layer.”<<<
If they did that at every track thinking about going to poly, there'd be no need for poly.... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i don't think the story totally changed.
what i read is they intend to keep the current surface but have decided to replace the asphalt layer below that wasn't draining properly. it'll be the same surface with a different base. what i wonder about is if the problem with drainage was the asphalt, how did the pro-ride compound they added resolve anything? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() this is exactly why I don't like using porous asphalt, its difficult to install and if not done right, or a few glitches here are there it does not drain.
|